坚持到底。欧亚贸易和商业公司的兴起(1400-1700

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Luisa Brunori
{"title":"坚持到底。欧亚贸易和商业公司的兴起(1400-1700","authors":"Luisa Brunori","doi":"10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European interventions and for its suggestive observations about the place of property in European legal thought about global power. Few historians will disagree with Koskenniemi’s observations about the functions of legal imagination to persuade, illuminate power, and draw on materials at hand to respond to novel problems. Some may push further, and perhaps also challenge, specific assertions about property and rights in European legal discourse. Still others may define ‘home’ in radically different ways or emphasize continuities rather than differences among geographically centred traditions of European discourse. For its provocations about property and its broad coverage, the book will surely be mined by historians pursuing these and other scholarly agendas for generations to come.","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"10 1","pages":"209 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going the distance. Eurasian trade and the rise of the business corporation, 1400–1700\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Brunori\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"European interventions and for its suggestive observations about the place of property in European legal thought about global power. Few historians will disagree with Koskenniemi’s observations about the functions of legal imagination to persuade, illuminate power, and draw on materials at hand to respond to novel problems. Some may push further, and perhaps also challenge, specific assertions about property and rights in European legal discourse. Still others may define ‘home’ in radically different ways or emphasize continuities rather than differences among geographically centred traditions of European discourse. For its provocations about property and its broad coverage, the book will surely be mined by historians pursuing these and other scholarly agendas for generations to come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

欧洲的干预及其对财产在欧洲关于全球权力的法律思想中的地位的暗示性观察。很少有历史学家会不同意Koskenniemi关于法律想象力在说服、阐明权力和利用手头材料应对新问题方面的作用的观察。一些人可能会进一步推动,也许也会质疑欧洲法律话语中关于财产和权利的具体主张。还有一些人可能以完全不同的方式定义“家”,或者强调欧洲话语中以地理为中心的传统之间的连续性,而不是差异性。由于这本书对财产的挑衅和广泛的报道,历史学家们肯定会在未来几代人的时间里挖掘这本书和其他学术议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Going the distance. Eurasian trade and the rise of the business corporation, 1400–1700
European interventions and for its suggestive observations about the place of property in European legal thought about global power. Few historians will disagree with Koskenniemi’s observations about the functions of legal imagination to persuade, illuminate power, and draw on materials at hand to respond to novel problems. Some may push further, and perhaps also challenge, specific assertions about property and rights in European legal discourse. Still others may define ‘home’ in radically different ways or emphasize continuities rather than differences among geographically centred traditions of European discourse. For its provocations about property and its broad coverage, the book will surely be mined by historians pursuing these and other scholarly agendas for generations to come.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信