Feldenkrais方法和帕金森病的功能:一项随机对照临床试验

Lavínia Teixeira-Machado, Fernanda M. de Araújo, M. Menezes, F. A. Cunha, Thainá Menezes, C. D. S. Ferreira, J. DeSantana
{"title":"Feldenkrais方法和帕金森病的功能:一项随机对照临床试验","authors":"Lavínia Teixeira-Machado, Fernanda M. de Araújo, M. Menezes, F. A. Cunha, Thainá Menezes, C. D. S. Ferreira, J. DeSantana","doi":"10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The second most common age-related chronic neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease is Parkinson’s disease (PD). Objective: The focus of this study was to improve the functional capabilities of the participants with PD. Study groups: The PD participants were randomized into two groups: Feldenkrais and control. Methods: The Feldenkrais group underwent 50 sessions of an exercise program based on the Feldenkrais method. The control group received educational lectures during this period. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rate Scale (UPDRS – session III), mini-mental state evaluation (MMSE), Hoehn and Yahr scale, and functional tests (figure-of-eight walk test, timed-up-and-go test, rollover task, 360 degrees turn-in-place, functional-reach test, sitting-and-standing test, Berg balance scale (BBS), and hip-flexion strength) were assessed in both groups. Procedures during the 50 sessions were conducted in an appropriate room, twice-a-week, on alternate days and lasted 60 min. Results: Thirty subjects were randomly divided into two groups: the Feldenkrais (n=15) and the control (n=15) group. The Feldenkrais group presented significantly better in functional tests (p<0.05) when compared to the control group. The control group received lower scores after the 50-session period in the sitting/standing test (p=0.02), 360 degrees turn-in-place (p=0.01), and rollover test (p=0.01). Results of the BBS demonstrated significantly higher scores in the Feldenkrais group after treatment (p=0.004) when compared to the control group (p=0.01). Conclusion: The Feldenkrais lessons produced specific changes in functional mobility in PD participants.","PeriodicalId":50278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Disability and Human Development","volume":"16 1","pages":"59 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0006","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feldenkrais method and functionality in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Lavínia Teixeira-Machado, Fernanda M. de Araújo, M. Menezes, F. A. Cunha, Thainá Menezes, C. D. S. Ferreira, J. DeSantana\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: The second most common age-related chronic neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease is Parkinson’s disease (PD). Objective: The focus of this study was to improve the functional capabilities of the participants with PD. Study groups: The PD participants were randomized into two groups: Feldenkrais and control. Methods: The Feldenkrais group underwent 50 sessions of an exercise program based on the Feldenkrais method. The control group received educational lectures during this period. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rate Scale (UPDRS – session III), mini-mental state evaluation (MMSE), Hoehn and Yahr scale, and functional tests (figure-of-eight walk test, timed-up-and-go test, rollover task, 360 degrees turn-in-place, functional-reach test, sitting-and-standing test, Berg balance scale (BBS), and hip-flexion strength) were assessed in both groups. Procedures during the 50 sessions were conducted in an appropriate room, twice-a-week, on alternate days and lasted 60 min. Results: Thirty subjects were randomly divided into two groups: the Feldenkrais (n=15) and the control (n=15) group. The Feldenkrais group presented significantly better in functional tests (p<0.05) when compared to the control group. The control group received lower scores after the 50-session period in the sitting/standing test (p=0.02), 360 degrees turn-in-place (p=0.01), and rollover test (p=0.01). Results of the BBS demonstrated significantly higher scores in the Feldenkrais group after treatment (p=0.004) when compared to the control group (p=0.01). Conclusion: The Feldenkrais lessons produced specific changes in functional mobility in PD participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Disability and Human Development\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0006\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Disability and Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Disability and Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:帕金森病(PD)是仅次于阿尔茨海默病的第二常见的与年龄相关的慢性神经退行性疾病。目的:本研究的重点是提高PD患者的功能能力。研究小组:PD参与者被随机分为两组:Feldenkrais组和对照组。方法:费登奎斯组接受了基于费登奎斯方法的50次锻炼计划。对照组在此期间接受教育讲座。统一帕金森病发病率量表(UPDRS - session III)、最小精神状态评估(MMSE)、Hoehn和Yahr量表和功能测试(8字形步行测试、计时起身测试、翻转任务、360度原地转弯、功能到达测试、坐立测试、Berg平衡量表(BBS)和髋屈强度)对两组进行评估。在50个疗程中,在适当的房间进行,每周两次,隔天进行,持续60分钟。结果:30名受试者随机分为两组:Feldenkrais组(n=15)和control组(n=15)。与对照组相比,Feldenkrais组在功能测试中表现明显优于对照组(p<0.05)。对照组在坐/站测试(p=0.02)、360度原地翻转测试(p=0.01)和侧翻测试(p=0.01)中得分较低。治疗后,Feldenkrais组的BBS评分明显高于对照组(p=0.01) (p=0.004)。结论:费登奎斯课程对PD参与者的功能活动能力产生了特殊的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feldenkrais method and functionality in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Abstract Background: The second most common age-related chronic neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease is Parkinson’s disease (PD). Objective: The focus of this study was to improve the functional capabilities of the participants with PD. Study groups: The PD participants were randomized into two groups: Feldenkrais and control. Methods: The Feldenkrais group underwent 50 sessions of an exercise program based on the Feldenkrais method. The control group received educational lectures during this period. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rate Scale (UPDRS – session III), mini-mental state evaluation (MMSE), Hoehn and Yahr scale, and functional tests (figure-of-eight walk test, timed-up-and-go test, rollover task, 360 degrees turn-in-place, functional-reach test, sitting-and-standing test, Berg balance scale (BBS), and hip-flexion strength) were assessed in both groups. Procedures during the 50 sessions were conducted in an appropriate room, twice-a-week, on alternate days and lasted 60 min. Results: Thirty subjects were randomly divided into two groups: the Feldenkrais (n=15) and the control (n=15) group. The Feldenkrais group presented significantly better in functional tests (p<0.05) when compared to the control group. The control group received lower scores after the 50-session period in the sitting/standing test (p=0.02), 360 degrees turn-in-place (p=0.01), and rollover test (p=0.01). Results of the BBS demonstrated significantly higher scores in the Feldenkrais group after treatment (p=0.004) when compared to the control group (p=0.01). Conclusion: The Feldenkrais lessons produced specific changes in functional mobility in PD participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信