资本与世界劳工:19世纪奴隶制的兴衰

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Tâmis Parron
{"title":"资本与世界劳工:19世纪奴隶制的兴衰","authors":"Tâmis Parron","doi":"10.7440/histcrit89.2023.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/context: The boom-and-bust of New World slavery in the nineteenth century has always been a major topic of scholarship. In this essay, I suggest that the literature devoted to this theme, the so-called “capitalism and slavery debate,” has made capital invisible as a category of analysis due to its over-reliance on classical and neoclassical economics. As a result, slavery itself has been poorly historicized. My purpose is to put forth an alternative framework to restore the historicity of capital and slavery. Methodology: The article explores critical value theory to conceptualize capital and capitalism in historically meaningful terms. It argues that value creation is never confined to one country. It requires a historically transnational social formation that turns concrete labor into abstract labor and use-values into commodities through the multi-scale operatives of world money and world markets. The history of slavery should be narrated within this broader globalizing setting. Originality: The article’s claim is that the global value relations of industrial capital redetermined spatial relations between town and country, capital and labor, and production and consumption, engendering overlapping layers of a world geography of accumulation that both stimulated and challenged slavery. Conclusions: While most scholars present the relation between slavery and capitalism as constant for the period 1780-1880, I conclude that New World slavery went through two moments of boom-and-bust (c.1780-c.1820 and c.1830-1880), which were formed through, respectively, the global value relations of cotton production and coal-and-iron industrialism.","PeriodicalId":45016,"journal":{"name":"Historia Critica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capital and World Labor: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the Nineteenth Century\",\"authors\":\"Tâmis Parron\",\"doi\":\"10.7440/histcrit89.2023.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective/context: The boom-and-bust of New World slavery in the nineteenth century has always been a major topic of scholarship. In this essay, I suggest that the literature devoted to this theme, the so-called “capitalism and slavery debate,” has made capital invisible as a category of analysis due to its over-reliance on classical and neoclassical economics. As a result, slavery itself has been poorly historicized. My purpose is to put forth an alternative framework to restore the historicity of capital and slavery. Methodology: The article explores critical value theory to conceptualize capital and capitalism in historically meaningful terms. It argues that value creation is never confined to one country. It requires a historically transnational social formation that turns concrete labor into abstract labor and use-values into commodities through the multi-scale operatives of world money and world markets. The history of slavery should be narrated within this broader globalizing setting. Originality: The article’s claim is that the global value relations of industrial capital redetermined spatial relations between town and country, capital and labor, and production and consumption, engendering overlapping layers of a world geography of accumulation that both stimulated and challenged slavery. Conclusions: While most scholars present the relation between slavery and capitalism as constant for the period 1780-1880, I conclude that New World slavery went through two moments of boom-and-bust (c.1780-c.1820 and c.1830-1880), which were formed through, respectively, the global value relations of cotton production and coal-and-iron industrialism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historia Critica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historia Critica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit89.2023.06\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia Critica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit89.2023.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标/背景:19世纪新世界奴隶制的繁荣和萧条一直是学术界的一个主要话题。在这篇文章中,我认为,致力于这一主题的文献,即所谓的“资本主义和奴隶制辩论”,由于过度依赖古典和新古典经济学,使资本作为一个分析类别变得不可见。因此,奴隶制本身的历史化程度很低。我的目的是提出一个替代框架,以恢复资本和奴隶制的历史性。方法论:本文探讨了批判性价值理论,以历史意义的术语对资本和资本主义进行概念化。它认为,价值创造从来都不局限于一个国家。它需要一种历史上的跨国社会形态,通过世界货币和世界市场的多尺度运作,将具体劳动转化为抽象劳动,并将价值观转化为商品。奴隶制的历史应当在更广泛的全球化背景下叙述。原创:文章声称,工业资本的全球价值关系重新定义了城镇与乡村、资本与劳动力、生产与消费之间的空间关系,产生了世界积累地理的重叠层,既刺激了奴隶制,也挑战了奴隶制。结论:虽然大多数学者认为奴隶制和资本主义之间的关系在1780-1880年间是不变的,但我得出的结论是,新世界奴隶制经历了两个繁荣和萧条的时刻(约1780-1820年和约1830-1880年),这两个时刻分别是通过棉花生产和煤铁工业的全球价值关系形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capital and World Labor: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the Nineteenth Century
Objective/context: The boom-and-bust of New World slavery in the nineteenth century has always been a major topic of scholarship. In this essay, I suggest that the literature devoted to this theme, the so-called “capitalism and slavery debate,” has made capital invisible as a category of analysis due to its over-reliance on classical and neoclassical economics. As a result, slavery itself has been poorly historicized. My purpose is to put forth an alternative framework to restore the historicity of capital and slavery. Methodology: The article explores critical value theory to conceptualize capital and capitalism in historically meaningful terms. It argues that value creation is never confined to one country. It requires a historically transnational social formation that turns concrete labor into abstract labor and use-values into commodities through the multi-scale operatives of world money and world markets. The history of slavery should be narrated within this broader globalizing setting. Originality: The article’s claim is that the global value relations of industrial capital redetermined spatial relations between town and country, capital and labor, and production and consumption, engendering overlapping layers of a world geography of accumulation that both stimulated and challenged slavery. Conclusions: While most scholars present the relation between slavery and capitalism as constant for the period 1780-1880, I conclude that New World slavery went through two moments of boom-and-bust (c.1780-c.1820 and c.1830-1880), which were formed through, respectively, the global value relations of cotton production and coal-and-iron industrialism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Historia Critica
Historia Critica Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Historia Crítica es la revista del Departamento de Historia de la Universidad de los Andes (Bogotá, Colombia). Cumple con sus lectores desde su creación en 1989. La revista Historia Crítica tiene como objetivo publicar artículos inéditos de autores nacionales y extranjeros, que presenten resultados de investigación histórica o balances historiográficos, así como reflexiones académicas relacionadas con los estudios históricos. La calidad de los artículos se asegura mediante un proceso de evaluación interno y externo, el cual es realizado por pares académicos nacionales e internacionales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信