前端应用程序的多个店面电子商务使用跨平台技术

I. E. Kho, Ahmad Windardi Aliyazis, M. Galinium
{"title":"前端应用程序的多个店面电子商务使用跨平台技术","authors":"I. E. Kho, Ahmad Windardi Aliyazis, M. Galinium","doi":"10.24818/beman/2022.12.1-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-platform framework is becoming more and more popular. Many giant tech companies have their own offering with different programming languages. With so many choices, sometimes it is difficult for a start-up developer to choose which framework they will use for their project. Therefore, this research aims to give insight for start-up developers on which cross-platform framework is better between Flutter and React Native by comparing their performance. This research achieved its goal by creating two identical mobile applications using Flutter and React Native and then comparing their performance using a theoretical framework that measures load time, average frame rate, and memory usage. The result of this testing is that Flutter has a shorter load time at 1.69 second compared to React Native at 4.26 second and lower memory usage at 6.52MB compared to React Native at 27.6MB. Their average frame rate is very comparable hovering around 60 frames per second. With faster load time and lower memory usage Flutter has better performance wise compared to React Native.","PeriodicalId":30801,"journal":{"name":"Business Excellence and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FRONT-END APPLICATION FOR MULTIPLE STOREFRONTS ECOMMERCE USING CROSS-PLATFORM TECHNOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"I. E. Kho, Ahmad Windardi Aliyazis, M. Galinium\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/beman/2022.12.1-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cross-platform framework is becoming more and more popular. Many giant tech companies have their own offering with different programming languages. With so many choices, sometimes it is difficult for a start-up developer to choose which framework they will use for their project. Therefore, this research aims to give insight for start-up developers on which cross-platform framework is better between Flutter and React Native by comparing their performance. This research achieved its goal by creating two identical mobile applications using Flutter and React Native and then comparing their performance using a theoretical framework that measures load time, average frame rate, and memory usage. The result of this testing is that Flutter has a shorter load time at 1.69 second compared to React Native at 4.26 second and lower memory usage at 6.52MB compared to React Native at 27.6MB. Their average frame rate is very comparable hovering around 60 frames per second. With faster load time and lower memory usage Flutter has better performance wise compared to React Native.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Excellence and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Excellence and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/beman/2022.12.1-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Excellence and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/beman/2022.12.1-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨平台框架正变得越来越流行。许多大型科技公司都有自己的产品,提供不同的编程语言。有这么多选择,有时初创开发人员很难选择他们将在项目中使用哪个框架。因此,本研究旨在通过比较Flutter和React Native的性能,让初创开发人员了解它们在哪个跨平台框架上更好。这项研究通过使用Flutter和React Native创建两个相同的移动应用程序,然后使用测量加载时间、平均帧速率和内存使用情况的理论框架来比较它们的性能,从而实现了目标。该测试的结果是,与4.26秒的React Native相比,Flutter在1.69秒时的加载时间更短,在6.52MB时的内存使用率也更低。它们的平均帧速率非常相似,徘徊在每秒60帧左右。Flutter具有更快的加载时间和更低的内存使用率,与React Native相比具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FRONT-END APPLICATION FOR MULTIPLE STOREFRONTS ECOMMERCE USING CROSS-PLATFORM TECHNOLOGY
Cross-platform framework is becoming more and more popular. Many giant tech companies have their own offering with different programming languages. With so many choices, sometimes it is difficult for a start-up developer to choose which framework they will use for their project. Therefore, this research aims to give insight for start-up developers on which cross-platform framework is better between Flutter and React Native by comparing their performance. This research achieved its goal by creating two identical mobile applications using Flutter and React Native and then comparing their performance using a theoretical framework that measures load time, average frame rate, and memory usage. The result of this testing is that Flutter has a shorter load time at 1.69 second compared to React Native at 4.26 second and lower memory usage at 6.52MB compared to React Native at 27.6MB. Their average frame rate is very comparable hovering around 60 frames per second. With faster load time and lower memory usage Flutter has better performance wise compared to React Native.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信