{"title":"种族在现代哲学中的相关性","authors":"D. Hibbs","doi":"10.51845/35.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Should the racial views of great thinkers from centuries past factor into modern evaluations of their work? Philosophy professor Darren Hibbs addresses this question and suggests a model for how the currently unpalatable views of philosophical luminaries should be approached in scholarship and in the classroom. Each discrete doctrine must be scrutinized to determine the relevance of the author's view on race.","PeriodicalId":35247,"journal":{"name":"Academic Questions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relevance of Race in Modern Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"D. Hibbs\",\"doi\":\"10.51845/35.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Should the racial views of great thinkers from centuries past factor into modern evaluations of their work? Philosophy professor Darren Hibbs addresses this question and suggests a model for how the currently unpalatable views of philosophical luminaries should be approached in scholarship and in the classroom. Each discrete doctrine must be scrutinized to determine the relevance of the author's view on race.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Questions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Questions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51845/35.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Questions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51845/35.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Should the racial views of great thinkers from centuries past factor into modern evaluations of their work? Philosophy professor Darren Hibbs addresses this question and suggests a model for how the currently unpalatable views of philosophical luminaries should be approached in scholarship and in the classroom. Each discrete doctrine must be scrutinized to determine the relevance of the author's view on race.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
