克罗地亚共和国公共部门的屏幕保护程序政策方面,标题为最常见的公共和公共服务类别:医疗、大学代表和同事、法官和司法顾问

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Pravni Vjesnik Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.25234/pv/24550
Vatroslav Zovko
{"title":"克罗地亚共和国公共部门的屏幕保护程序政策方面,标题为最常见的公共和公共服务类别:医疗、大学代表和同事、法官和司法顾问","authors":"Vatroslav Zovko","doi":"10.25234/pv/24550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public sector salary policy aims at making the salary system more transparent and keeping it at the same level in different public authorities and services. In practice, governing bodies use salary policy to demonstrate their priorities in managing the entire public sector. Such an approach frequently carries particular discriminatory features. The paper aims at presenting the system of determining the salaries of employees in public authorities and public services and giving an overview of the currently applicable legal framework in this regard. Considering the size of the public sector, a salary analysis was made on a sample of the salaries of university teaching personnel, doctors and judges. The criteria for selecting the jobs in question in the sample are the features common to each profession: independence in decision-making and work as set by the legal framework, a clear hierarchy of advancement in the profession, budget financed salaries and external evaluation related to potential advancement within the system. For each group of the aforesaid categories of employees, the similarities and differences in the salary determination system are shown. Accordingly, the extent to which the principle of equal pay for equal work is respected as stipulated by the provisions of the Labour Law, as well as potentially discriminatory elements in the determining salaries system within the public sector are established.","PeriodicalId":41100,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Vjesnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DISKRIMINATORNI ASPEKTI POLITIKE PLAĆA U JAVNOM SEKTORU U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ, S NAGLASKOM NA POJEDINE KATEGORIJE ZAPOSLENIH U DRŽAVNIM TIJELIMA I JAVNIM SLUŽBAMA : LIJEČNIKA, SVEUČILIŠNIH NASTAVNIKA I SURADNIKA, SUDACA I SUDSKIH SAVJETNIKA\",\"authors\":\"Vatroslav Zovko\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/pv/24550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public sector salary policy aims at making the salary system more transparent and keeping it at the same level in different public authorities and services. In practice, governing bodies use salary policy to demonstrate their priorities in managing the entire public sector. Such an approach frequently carries particular discriminatory features. The paper aims at presenting the system of determining the salaries of employees in public authorities and public services and giving an overview of the currently applicable legal framework in this regard. Considering the size of the public sector, a salary analysis was made on a sample of the salaries of university teaching personnel, doctors and judges. The criteria for selecting the jobs in question in the sample are the features common to each profession: independence in decision-making and work as set by the legal framework, a clear hierarchy of advancement in the profession, budget financed salaries and external evaluation related to potential advancement within the system. For each group of the aforesaid categories of employees, the similarities and differences in the salary determination system are shown. Accordingly, the extent to which the principle of equal pay for equal work is respected as stipulated by the provisions of the Labour Law, as well as potentially discriminatory elements in the determining salaries system within the public sector are established.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravni Vjesnik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravni Vjesnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/24550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/24550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共部门薪金政策的目的是使薪金制度更加透明,并使其在不同的公共当局和服务中保持同一水平。实际上,理事机构利用薪金政策来表明它们在管理整个公共部门方面的优先次序。这种做法往往带有特别的歧视性特征。该文件旨在介绍确定公共当局和公共服务部门雇员薪金的制度,并概述目前在这方面适用的法律框架。考虑到公共部门的规模,以大学教师、医生和法官的工资为样本进行了工资分析。样本中选择有关工作的标准是每个职业的共同特点:法律框架规定的独立决策和工作、职业晋升的明确等级、预算资助的工资和与系统内潜在晋升有关的外部评价。对于上述每一组员工类别,分别给出了薪酬确定制度的异同。因此,确定了《劳工法》条款所规定的对同工同酬原则的尊重程度,以及公共部门内确定薪金制度中可能存在的歧视因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DISKRIMINATORNI ASPEKTI POLITIKE PLAĆA U JAVNOM SEKTORU U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ, S NAGLASKOM NA POJEDINE KATEGORIJE ZAPOSLENIH U DRŽAVNIM TIJELIMA I JAVNIM SLUŽBAMA : LIJEČNIKA, SVEUČILIŠNIH NASTAVNIKA I SURADNIKA, SUDACA I SUDSKIH SAVJETNIKA
Public sector salary policy aims at making the salary system more transparent and keeping it at the same level in different public authorities and services. In practice, governing bodies use salary policy to demonstrate their priorities in managing the entire public sector. Such an approach frequently carries particular discriminatory features. The paper aims at presenting the system of determining the salaries of employees in public authorities and public services and giving an overview of the currently applicable legal framework in this regard. Considering the size of the public sector, a salary analysis was made on a sample of the salaries of university teaching personnel, doctors and judges. The criteria for selecting the jobs in question in the sample are the features common to each profession: independence in decision-making and work as set by the legal framework, a clear hierarchy of advancement in the profession, budget financed salaries and external evaluation related to potential advancement within the system. For each group of the aforesaid categories of employees, the similarities and differences in the salary determination system are shown. Accordingly, the extent to which the principle of equal pay for equal work is respected as stipulated by the provisions of the Labour Law, as well as potentially discriminatory elements in the determining salaries system within the public sector are established.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信