经颅阳极直流电刺激初级运动皮层对低活动水平老年人运动学习的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Razieh Abedi, Ailin Talimkhani, Zahra Mohammadzadeh, A. Daryabor, S. Naimi
{"title":"经颅阳极直流电刺激初级运动皮层对低活动水平老年人运动学习的影响","authors":"Razieh Abedi, Ailin Talimkhani, Zahra Mohammadzadeh, A. Daryabor, S. Naimi","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2021.0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older adults with different physical activity levels have often demonstrated individual differences in motor performance and learning. Serial reaction time task training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex were used in this study to evaluate how these interventions affected motor learning in older adults with low activity levels. In this randomised controlled trial, 28 healthy, right-handed, older adults with low activity levels, with a mean age of 69.92 years, were randomly allocated to an anodal transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14) or sham transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14), based on a simple non-probability sampling method. The experimental group was exposed to 20 minutes of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex, using a tDCS device, alongside eight sequenced or randomised blocks of serial reaction time task activities, for 5 consecutive days. In the control group, the tDCS device was automatically switched off after 1 minute. To assess implicit motor learning, the response time and error rate of two sequenced blocks of serial reaction time task activities were collected before, immediately following, 1 day and 1 week after the completion of the intervention. Immediately following the end of the intervention, at day 5, the mean response time and error rate were 925.09 and 2.55 in the experimental group, and 1016.52 and 4.10 in the control group. At 1 day after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 927.40 and 3.03 in the experimental group and 1021.91 and 4.34 in the control group. At 1 week after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 942.26 and 3.63 in the experimental group and 1050.08 and 5.11 in the control group. These findings indicate that response time and error rate were significantly decreased in both stimulation groups at different time points (P<0.001). At the same time, there were no significant differences in the response time and error rate between the two groups at different time points: immediately (P=0.07, P=0.31), 1 day (P=0.06, P=0.41) and 1 week (P=0.04, P=0.35) after the completion of the intervention respectively. Serial reaction time task training, with or without applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, can improve motor learning in low-activity older adults. Therefore, it appears that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation did not affect or improve motor learning in older adults with low motor activity. Motor learning training can be used alone as a practical and helpful intervention to improve performance and implicit motor skill learning with long-lasting effects in older adults with low levels of activity.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex on motor learning in older adults with low levels of activity\",\"authors\":\"Razieh Abedi, Ailin Talimkhani, Zahra Mohammadzadeh, A. Daryabor, S. Naimi\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijtr.2021.0158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Older adults with different physical activity levels have often demonstrated individual differences in motor performance and learning. Serial reaction time task training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex were used in this study to evaluate how these interventions affected motor learning in older adults with low activity levels. In this randomised controlled trial, 28 healthy, right-handed, older adults with low activity levels, with a mean age of 69.92 years, were randomly allocated to an anodal transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14) or sham transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14), based on a simple non-probability sampling method. The experimental group was exposed to 20 minutes of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex, using a tDCS device, alongside eight sequenced or randomised blocks of serial reaction time task activities, for 5 consecutive days. In the control group, the tDCS device was automatically switched off after 1 minute. To assess implicit motor learning, the response time and error rate of two sequenced blocks of serial reaction time task activities were collected before, immediately following, 1 day and 1 week after the completion of the intervention. Immediately following the end of the intervention, at day 5, the mean response time and error rate were 925.09 and 2.55 in the experimental group, and 1016.52 and 4.10 in the control group. At 1 day after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 927.40 and 3.03 in the experimental group and 1021.91 and 4.34 in the control group. At 1 week after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 942.26 and 3.63 in the experimental group and 1050.08 and 5.11 in the control group. These findings indicate that response time and error rate were significantly decreased in both stimulation groups at different time points (P<0.001). At the same time, there were no significant differences in the response time and error rate between the two groups at different time points: immediately (P=0.07, P=0.31), 1 day (P=0.06, P=0.41) and 1 week (P=0.04, P=0.35) after the completion of the intervention respectively. Serial reaction time task training, with or without applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, can improve motor learning in low-activity older adults. Therefore, it appears that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation did not affect or improve motor learning in older adults with low motor activity. Motor learning training can be used alone as a practical and helpful intervention to improve performance and implicit motor skill learning with long-lasting effects in older adults with low levels of activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2021.0158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2021.0158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不同体育活动水平的老年人在运动表现和学习方面往往表现出个体差异。本研究采用连续反应时间任务训练和经颅阳极直流电刺激初级运动皮层来评估这些干预措施如何影响低活动水平老年人的运动学习。在这项随机对照试验中,28名健康、右撇子、平均年龄69.92岁、活动水平低的老年人,采用简单的非概率抽样方法,随机分为经颅直流电刺激组(n=14)和假经颅直流电刺激组(n=14)。实验组使用tDCS装置对运动皮层进行20分钟的阳极经颅直流电刺激,同时连续5天进行8个顺序或随机分组的连续反应时间任务活动。对照组在1分钟后自动关闭tDCS装置。为了评估内隐运动学习,在干预结束前、干预结束后、干预结束后1天和干预结束后1周分别收集了两个序列反应时间任务活动的反应时间和错误率。干预结束后第5天,实验组的平均反应时间和错误率分别为925.09和2.55,对照组的平均反应时间和错误率分别为1016.52和4.10。干预结束后第1天,实验组平均反应时间为927.40,错误率为3.03,对照组平均反应时间为1021.91,错误率为4.34。干预结束后1周,实验组平均反应时间为942.26,错误率为3.63,对照组平均反应时间为1050.08,错误率为5.11。结果表明,刺激组和刺激组在不同时间点的反应时间和错误率均显著降低(P<0.001)。同时,两组在干预结束后即刻(P=0.07, P=0.31)、第1天(P=0.06, P=0.41)和第1周(P=0.04, P=0.35)不同时间点的反应时间和错误率差异均无统计学意义。连续反应时间任务训练,使用或不使用经颅直流电刺激,可以改善低活动老年人的运动学习。因此,阳极经颅直流电刺激似乎不会影响或改善低运动活动老年人的运动学习。运动学习训练可以单独作为一种实用和有益的干预措施,用于改善老年人低水平活动的表现和内隐运动技能学习,并具有持久的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex on motor learning in older adults with low levels of activity
Older adults with different physical activity levels have often demonstrated individual differences in motor performance and learning. Serial reaction time task training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex were used in this study to evaluate how these interventions affected motor learning in older adults with low activity levels. In this randomised controlled trial, 28 healthy, right-handed, older adults with low activity levels, with a mean age of 69.92 years, were randomly allocated to an anodal transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14) or sham transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14), based on a simple non-probability sampling method. The experimental group was exposed to 20 minutes of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex, using a tDCS device, alongside eight sequenced or randomised blocks of serial reaction time task activities, for 5 consecutive days. In the control group, the tDCS device was automatically switched off after 1 minute. To assess implicit motor learning, the response time and error rate of two sequenced blocks of serial reaction time task activities were collected before, immediately following, 1 day and 1 week after the completion of the intervention. Immediately following the end of the intervention, at day 5, the mean response time and error rate were 925.09 and 2.55 in the experimental group, and 1016.52 and 4.10 in the control group. At 1 day after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 927.40 and 3.03 in the experimental group and 1021.91 and 4.34 in the control group. At 1 week after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 942.26 and 3.63 in the experimental group and 1050.08 and 5.11 in the control group. These findings indicate that response time and error rate were significantly decreased in both stimulation groups at different time points (P<0.001). At the same time, there were no significant differences in the response time and error rate between the two groups at different time points: immediately (P=0.07, P=0.31), 1 day (P=0.06, P=0.41) and 1 week (P=0.04, P=0.35) after the completion of the intervention respectively. Serial reaction time task training, with or without applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, can improve motor learning in low-activity older adults. Therefore, it appears that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation did not affect or improve motor learning in older adults with low motor activity. Motor learning training can be used alone as a practical and helpful intervention to improve performance and implicit motor skill learning with long-lasting effects in older adults with low levels of activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信