建设和平模式:理论多样性对实现可持续和平的影响

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Amal Bourhrous
{"title":"建设和平模式:理论多样性对实现可持续和平的影响","authors":"Amal Bourhrous","doi":"10.1080/21647259.2021.1977018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peacebuilding Paradigms analyzes how seven political science paradigms: realism, liberalism, constructivism, cosmopolitanism, critical theories, locality and policy, have been used to interpret the causes and consequences of peacebuilding differently. The contributors explore the arguments of each paradigm, and then compare and contrast them. This book suggests that a hybrid approach that incorporates useful insights from each of these paradigms best explains how and why peacebuilding projects and policies succeed in some cases, fail in others, and provide lessons learned. Rather than merely using a theoretical approach, the authors use case studies to demonstrate why a focus on just one paradigm alone as an explanatory model is insufficient. This collection explains how peacebuilding theory affects peacebuilding policies and provides recommendations for best practices for future peacebuilding missions.","PeriodicalId":45555,"journal":{"name":"Peacebuilding","volume":"11 1","pages":"110 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peacebuilding paradigms: the impact of theoretical diversity on implementing sustainable peace\",\"authors\":\"Amal Bourhrous\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21647259.2021.1977018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peacebuilding Paradigms analyzes how seven political science paradigms: realism, liberalism, constructivism, cosmopolitanism, critical theories, locality and policy, have been used to interpret the causes and consequences of peacebuilding differently. The contributors explore the arguments of each paradigm, and then compare and contrast them. This book suggests that a hybrid approach that incorporates useful insights from each of these paradigms best explains how and why peacebuilding projects and policies succeed in some cases, fail in others, and provide lessons learned. Rather than merely using a theoretical approach, the authors use case studies to demonstrate why a focus on just one paradigm alone as an explanatory model is insufficient. This collection explains how peacebuilding theory affects peacebuilding policies and provides recommendations for best practices for future peacebuilding missions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peacebuilding\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peacebuilding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1977018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peacebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1977018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《建设和平范式》分析了现实主义、自由主义、建构主义、世界主义、批判理论、地方和政策等七种政治科学范式如何被用来不同地解释建设和平的原因和后果。作者探讨了每个范式的论点,然后对它们进行比较和对比。本书认为,结合这些范例的有用见解的混合方法最好地解释了建设和平项目和政策如何以及为什么在某些情况下成功,在其他情况下失败,并提供了经验教训。作者不是仅仅使用理论方法,而是使用案例研究来证明为什么只关注一种范式作为解释模型是不够的。本汇编解释了建设和平理论如何影响建设和平政策,并为今后的建设和平特派团提供了最佳做法建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peacebuilding paradigms: the impact of theoretical diversity on implementing sustainable peace
Peacebuilding Paradigms analyzes how seven political science paradigms: realism, liberalism, constructivism, cosmopolitanism, critical theories, locality and policy, have been used to interpret the causes and consequences of peacebuilding differently. The contributors explore the arguments of each paradigm, and then compare and contrast them. This book suggests that a hybrid approach that incorporates useful insights from each of these paradigms best explains how and why peacebuilding projects and policies succeed in some cases, fail in others, and provide lessons learned. Rather than merely using a theoretical approach, the authors use case studies to demonstrate why a focus on just one paradigm alone as an explanatory model is insufficient. This collection explains how peacebuilding theory affects peacebuilding policies and provides recommendations for best practices for future peacebuilding missions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peacebuilding
Peacebuilding Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信