使用Pop-GUIDE评估MCnest对蜂鸟农药相对风险的适用性

IF 1.7 Q3 ECOLOGY
Ecologies Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI:10.3390/ecologies4010013
Matthew A Etterson, Elizabeth A Paulukonis, S Thomas Purucker
{"title":"使用Pop-GUIDE评估MCnest对蜂鸟农药相对风险的适用性","authors":"Matthew A Etterson, Elizabeth A Paulukonis, S Thomas Purucker","doi":"10.3390/ecologies4010013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hummingbirds are charismatic fauna that provide important pollination services, including in the continental US, where 15 species regularly breed. Compared to other birds in North America, hummingbirds (family Trochilidae) have a unique exposure route to pesticides because they forage on nectar. Therefore, hummingbirds may be exposed to systemic pesticides borne in nectar. They also may be particularly vulnerable to pesticide exposure due to their small size and extreme metabolic demands. We review relevant factors including hummingbird life history, nectar residue uptake, and avian bioenergetic considerations with the goal of clearly identifying and articulating the specific modeling challenges that must be overcome to develop and/or adapt existing modeling approaches. To help evaluate these factors, we developed a dataset for ruby-throated hummingbirds (<i>Archilochus colubris</i>) and other avian species potentially exposed to pesticides. We used the systemic neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid as an illustration and compared results to five other common current use pesticides. We use the structure of Pop-GUIDE to provide a conceptual modeling framework for implementation of MCnest and to compile parameter values and relevant algorithms to predict the effects of pesticide exposure on avian pollinators. Conservative screening assessments suggest the potential for adverse effects from imidacloprid, as do more refined assessments, though many important limitations and uncertainties remain. Our review found many areas in which current USEPA avian models must be improved in order to conduct a full higher-tier risk assessment for avian pollinators exposed to neonicotinoid insecticides, including addition of models suitable for soil and seed treatments within the MCnest environment, ability to include empirical residue data in both nectar and invertebrates rather than relying on existing nomograms, expansion of MCnest to a full annual cycle, and increased representation of spatial heterogeneity. Although this work focuses on hummingbirds, the methods and recommendations may apply more widely to other vertebrate pollinators.</p>","PeriodicalId":72866,"journal":{"name":"Ecologies","volume":"1 1","pages":"171-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Pop-GUIDE to Assess the Applicability of MCnest for Relative Risk of Pesticides to Hummingbirds.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew A Etterson, Elizabeth A Paulukonis, S Thomas Purucker\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ecologies4010013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hummingbirds are charismatic fauna that provide important pollination services, including in the continental US, where 15 species regularly breed. Compared to other birds in North America, hummingbirds (family Trochilidae) have a unique exposure route to pesticides because they forage on nectar. Therefore, hummingbirds may be exposed to systemic pesticides borne in nectar. They also may be particularly vulnerable to pesticide exposure due to their small size and extreme metabolic demands. We review relevant factors including hummingbird life history, nectar residue uptake, and avian bioenergetic considerations with the goal of clearly identifying and articulating the specific modeling challenges that must be overcome to develop and/or adapt existing modeling approaches. To help evaluate these factors, we developed a dataset for ruby-throated hummingbirds (<i>Archilochus colubris</i>) and other avian species potentially exposed to pesticides. We used the systemic neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid as an illustration and compared results to five other common current use pesticides. We use the structure of Pop-GUIDE to provide a conceptual modeling framework for implementation of MCnest and to compile parameter values and relevant algorithms to predict the effects of pesticide exposure on avian pollinators. Conservative screening assessments suggest the potential for adverse effects from imidacloprid, as do more refined assessments, though many important limitations and uncertainties remain. Our review found many areas in which current USEPA avian models must be improved in order to conduct a full higher-tier risk assessment for avian pollinators exposed to neonicotinoid insecticides, including addition of models suitable for soil and seed treatments within the MCnest environment, ability to include empirical residue data in both nectar and invertebrates rather than relying on existing nomograms, expansion of MCnest to a full annual cycle, and increased representation of spatial heterogeneity. Although this work focuses on hummingbirds, the methods and recommendations may apply more widely to other vertebrate pollinators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecologies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"171-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies4010013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies4010013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蜂鸟是有魅力的动物群,提供重要的授粉服务,包括在美国大陆,有15种蜂鸟定期繁殖。与北美的其他鸟类相比,蜂鸟(蜂鸟科)有一个独特的接触杀虫剂的途径,因为它们以花蜜为食。因此,蜂鸟可能会接触到通过花蜜传播的系统性杀虫剂。它们也可能特别容易受到农药的影响,因为它们体型小,代谢需求旺盛。我们回顾了相关因素,包括蜂鸟生活史、花蜜残留物摄取和鸟类生物能量考虑,目的是清楚地识别和阐明必须克服的特定建模挑战,以开发和/或适应现有的建模方法。为了帮助评估这些因素,我们开发了一个红宝石喉蜂鸟(Archilochus colubris)和其他可能暴露于农药的鸟类物种的数据集。我们以系统新烟碱类杀虫剂吡虫啉为例,并将结果与其他五种常用杀虫剂进行了比较。我们利用Pop-GUIDE的结构为MCnest的实现提供了一个概念建模框架,并编制了参数值和相关算法来预测农药暴露对鸟类传粉媒介的影响。保守的筛选评估表明吡虫啉可能有不良反应,更精细的评估也是如此,尽管仍然存在许多重要的局限性和不确定性。我们的审查发现,为了对暴露于新烟碱类杀虫剂的鸟类传粉媒介进行全面的更高层次的风险评估,目前的USEPA鸟类模型必须在许多领域进行改进,包括在MCnest环境中添加适合土壤和种子处理的模型,能够包括花蜜和无脊椎动物的经验残留数据,而不是依赖于现有的nomograms,将MCnest扩展到一个完整的年度周期。增加了空间异质性的代表性。虽然这项工作的重点是蜂鸟,但方法和建议可能更广泛地适用于其他脊椎动物传粉者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Pop-GUIDE to Assess the Applicability of MCnest for Relative Risk of Pesticides to Hummingbirds.

Hummingbirds are charismatic fauna that provide important pollination services, including in the continental US, where 15 species regularly breed. Compared to other birds in North America, hummingbirds (family Trochilidae) have a unique exposure route to pesticides because they forage on nectar. Therefore, hummingbirds may be exposed to systemic pesticides borne in nectar. They also may be particularly vulnerable to pesticide exposure due to their small size and extreme metabolic demands. We review relevant factors including hummingbird life history, nectar residue uptake, and avian bioenergetic considerations with the goal of clearly identifying and articulating the specific modeling challenges that must be overcome to develop and/or adapt existing modeling approaches. To help evaluate these factors, we developed a dataset for ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) and other avian species potentially exposed to pesticides. We used the systemic neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid as an illustration and compared results to five other common current use pesticides. We use the structure of Pop-GUIDE to provide a conceptual modeling framework for implementation of MCnest and to compile parameter values and relevant algorithms to predict the effects of pesticide exposure on avian pollinators. Conservative screening assessments suggest the potential for adverse effects from imidacloprid, as do more refined assessments, though many important limitations and uncertainties remain. Our review found many areas in which current USEPA avian models must be improved in order to conduct a full higher-tier risk assessment for avian pollinators exposed to neonicotinoid insecticides, including addition of models suitable for soil and seed treatments within the MCnest environment, ability to include empirical residue data in both nectar and invertebrates rather than relying on existing nomograms, expansion of MCnest to a full annual cycle, and increased representation of spatial heterogeneity. Although this work focuses on hummingbirds, the methods and recommendations may apply more widely to other vertebrate pollinators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信