{"title":"《女性主义思辨小说的技术:性别、人工生命和生殖政治》,作者:雪莉·文特、塞丝·梅拉·布兰","authors":"Sara Hosey","doi":"10.1353/sfs.2023.a900294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"dramatically underline one of Suvin’s persistent and most important themes: that we cannot separate our cultural productions, even our favorite genres, from the historical and economic circumstances of their origins. Like most of the other essays, it is supplemented by extensive notes and a detailed bibliography. If Disputing the Deluge seems in part a mixed bag of the personal, the critical, and the broadly theoretical, at times reminiscent of the 2011 special issue of Paradoxa, Darko Suvin: A Life in Letters, the overall tone is anything but valedictory. There are indeed some ave atque vale moments; one of his more recent poems includes the lines “Once life was adventure, knowledge, glory/Now it’s anxiety, a wandering recollection, /Disappointment, protest, and reflection ... ”(259-60). But as Hugh O’Connell points out in his introduction, the final words of the book, deliberately re-appropriated and repurposed from Margaret Thatcher, are “There Is No Alternative!” (343), a phrase resonant with major themes throughout the book, from war to the capitalocene to utopia/antiutopia to climate change and pandemics. It is a reminder that, for all his reputation as a fiercely rigorous (and sometimes rigid) theorist, Suvin has never been less than an activist, and never less than passionate.—Gary Wolfe, Locus Foundation","PeriodicalId":45553,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","volume":"50 1","pages":"306 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technologies of Feminist Speculative Fiction: Gender, Artificial Life, and the Politics of Reproduction ed. by Sherryl Vint and Sümeyra Buran (review)\",\"authors\":\"Sara Hosey\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sfs.2023.a900294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"dramatically underline one of Suvin’s persistent and most important themes: that we cannot separate our cultural productions, even our favorite genres, from the historical and economic circumstances of their origins. Like most of the other essays, it is supplemented by extensive notes and a detailed bibliography. If Disputing the Deluge seems in part a mixed bag of the personal, the critical, and the broadly theoretical, at times reminiscent of the 2011 special issue of Paradoxa, Darko Suvin: A Life in Letters, the overall tone is anything but valedictory. There are indeed some ave atque vale moments; one of his more recent poems includes the lines “Once life was adventure, knowledge, glory/Now it’s anxiety, a wandering recollection, /Disappointment, protest, and reflection ... ”(259-60). But as Hugh O’Connell points out in his introduction, the final words of the book, deliberately re-appropriated and repurposed from Margaret Thatcher, are “There Is No Alternative!” (343), a phrase resonant with major themes throughout the book, from war to the capitalocene to utopia/antiutopia to climate change and pandemics. It is a reminder that, for all his reputation as a fiercely rigorous (and sometimes rigid) theorist, Suvin has never been less than an activist, and never less than passionate.—Gary Wolfe, Locus Foundation\",\"PeriodicalId\":45553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"306 - 309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2023.a900294\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2023.a900294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
戏剧性地强调了苏文持久且最重要的主题之一:我们不能将我们的文化产品,即使是我们最喜欢的类型,与它们起源的历史和经济环境分开。像大多数其他文章一样,它补充了大量的注释和详细的参考书目。如果说《争论洪水》在某种程度上是个人、批判和广义理论的混合体,有时会让人想起《悖论》2011年的特刊《达科·苏文:书信中的生活》,那么总体基调绝不是告别。确实有一些非常重要的时刻;他最近的一首诗中有这样的诗句:“生活曾经是冒险、知识和荣耀/现在是焦虑、漂泊的回忆/失望、抗议和反思……””(259 - 60)。但正如休·奥康奈尔(Hugh O 'Connell)在前言中指出的那样,这本书的最后一句话是“别无选择!”(343),这句话贯穿全书的主题,从战争到新资本时代,从乌托邦/反乌托邦到气候变化和流行病。它提醒我们,尽管苏文以极其严谨(有时甚至是死板)的理论家而闻名,但他从来都是一个积极分子,从来都是一个充满激情的人。——加里·沃尔夫,轨迹基金会
Technologies of Feminist Speculative Fiction: Gender, Artificial Life, and the Politics of Reproduction ed. by Sherryl Vint and Sümeyra Buran (review)
dramatically underline one of Suvin’s persistent and most important themes: that we cannot separate our cultural productions, even our favorite genres, from the historical and economic circumstances of their origins. Like most of the other essays, it is supplemented by extensive notes and a detailed bibliography. If Disputing the Deluge seems in part a mixed bag of the personal, the critical, and the broadly theoretical, at times reminiscent of the 2011 special issue of Paradoxa, Darko Suvin: A Life in Letters, the overall tone is anything but valedictory. There are indeed some ave atque vale moments; one of his more recent poems includes the lines “Once life was adventure, knowledge, glory/Now it’s anxiety, a wandering recollection, /Disappointment, protest, and reflection ... ”(259-60). But as Hugh O’Connell points out in his introduction, the final words of the book, deliberately re-appropriated and repurposed from Margaret Thatcher, are “There Is No Alternative!” (343), a phrase resonant with major themes throughout the book, from war to the capitalocene to utopia/antiutopia to climate change and pandemics. It is a reminder that, for all his reputation as a fiercely rigorous (and sometimes rigid) theorist, Suvin has never been less than an activist, and never less than passionate.—Gary Wolfe, Locus Foundation