反对科学主义的辩论策略综述

IF 1 4区综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1080/03080188.2023.2167398

R. Woudenberg

{"title":"反对科学主义的辩论策略综述","authors":"R. Woudenberg","doi":"10.1080/03080188.2023.2167398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents and discusses various strategies that have been wielded against scientism, roughly the claim that only science can give us knowledge. The strategies identified are: (1) the counter example strategy, (2) the denying of claimed entailments of science strategy, (3) the self-undermining strategy, (4) the presupposition strategy, and (5) the limits of science strategy. In addition, two proposals are discussed that aim to recast the debate about scientism in a way that renders these strategies obsolete. It is argued that these proposals are misguided.","PeriodicalId":50352,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Argumentative strategies against scientism: an overview\",\"authors\":\"R. Woudenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03080188.2023.2167398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper presents and discusses various strategies that have been wielded against scientism, roughly the claim that only science can give us knowledge. The strategies identified are: (1) the counter example strategy, (2) the denying of claimed entailments of science strategy, (3) the self-undermining strategy, (4) the presupposition strategy, and (5) the limits of science strategy. In addition, two proposals are discussed that aim to recast the debate about scientism in a way that renders these strategies obsolete. It is argued that these proposals are misguided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2023.2167398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2023.2167398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出并讨论了反对科学主义的各种策略，科学主义大致上是指只有科学才能给我们知识。所确定的策略有:(1)反例策略，(2)否认科学策略的要求，(3)自我破坏策略，(4)预设策略，以及(5)科学策略的局限性。此外，本文还讨论了两项建议，它们旨在以一种使这些策略过时的方式，重塑关于科学主义的辩论。有人认为这些建议是错误的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Argumentative strategies against scientism: an overview

ABSTRACT This paper presents and discusses various strategies that have been wielded against scientism, roughly the claim that only science can give us knowledge. The strategies identified are: (1) the counter example strategy, (2) the denying of claimed entailments of science strategy, (3) the self-undermining strategy, (4) the presupposition strategy, and (5) the limits of science strategy. In addition, two proposals are discussed that aim to recast the debate about scientism in a way that renders these strategies obsolete. It is argued that these proposals are misguided.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 综合性期刊-综合性期刊

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Interdisciplinary Science Reviews is a quarterly journal that aims to explore the social, philosophical and historical interrelations of the natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, medicine and technology with the social sciences, humanities and arts.