族群间接触与社会距离假说:澳大利亚大学生对伊斯兰教和穆斯林的看法

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
A. Ata, Stjepan Sambol
{"title":"族群间接触与社会距离假说:澳大利亚大学生对伊斯兰教和穆斯林的看法","authors":"A. Ata, Stjepan Sambol","doi":"10.1080/13602004.2022.2113287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Australian and other Western survey research on intergroup contact, commonly referred to as “social distance”, has generally focused on negative attitudes and emotions as measures of prejudice. The current research, by contrast, investigates the level of social contact mainstream (non-Muslim) students in six Australian universities favor towards Muslims, as compared with other ethnicities. Three measures were used to test this proposition: intermarriage, friendship, and neighborhood. The findings revealed that acceptance of other ethnicities/religions as opposed to Muslims was higher than that of their parents. However, the gap narrows significantly between participants and their parents on the following two measures: “going out with” and “marrying” Muslims. Secondly, on the measures of “going out”, “being friends” with, and “marrying” someone from other ethnicities/religions, participants responses were more favorable than those conveyed towards Muslim groups. We suggest that future research is extended to measure other variables, namely gender, children of Muslim–Christian intermarriage, and the post effects of the shooting incidents in Christchurch on 15 March 2019.","PeriodicalId":45523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs","volume":"42 1","pages":"227 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intergroup Contact and Social Distance Hypothesis: Australian University Students’ Views on Islam and Muslims\",\"authors\":\"A. Ata, Stjepan Sambol\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13602004.2022.2113287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Australian and other Western survey research on intergroup contact, commonly referred to as “social distance”, has generally focused on negative attitudes and emotions as measures of prejudice. The current research, by contrast, investigates the level of social contact mainstream (non-Muslim) students in six Australian universities favor towards Muslims, as compared with other ethnicities. Three measures were used to test this proposition: intermarriage, friendship, and neighborhood. The findings revealed that acceptance of other ethnicities/religions as opposed to Muslims was higher than that of their parents. However, the gap narrows significantly between participants and their parents on the following two measures: “going out with” and “marrying” Muslims. Secondly, on the measures of “going out”, “being friends” with, and “marrying” someone from other ethnicities/religions, participants responses were more favorable than those conveyed towards Muslim groups. We suggest that future research is extended to measure other variables, namely gender, children of Muslim–Christian intermarriage, and the post effects of the shooting incidents in Christchurch on 15 March 2019.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"227 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2113287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2113287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要澳大利亚和其他西方国家对群体间接触(通常被称为“社交距离”)的调查研究通常侧重于负面态度和情绪作为偏见的衡量标准。相比之下,目前的研究调查了六所澳大利亚大学的主流(非穆斯林)学生与其他种族相比对穆斯林的社会接触水平。有三个衡量标准被用来检验这个命题:通婚、友谊和邻里关系。调查结果显示,与穆斯林相比,其他种族/宗教的接受度高于其父母。然而,在以下两项指标上,参与者与父母之间的差距显著缩小:“与穆斯林交往”和“与穆斯林结婚”。其次,在“走出去”、“成为朋友”和“嫁给”其他种族/宗教的人方面,参与者的反应比对穆斯林群体的反应更有利。我们建议,未来的研究将扩展到衡量其他变量,即性别、穆斯林-基督教通婚的子女,以及2019年3月15日克赖斯特彻奇枪击事件的后效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intergroup Contact and Social Distance Hypothesis: Australian University Students’ Views on Islam and Muslims
Abstract Australian and other Western survey research on intergroup contact, commonly referred to as “social distance”, has generally focused on negative attitudes and emotions as measures of prejudice. The current research, by contrast, investigates the level of social contact mainstream (non-Muslim) students in six Australian universities favor towards Muslims, as compared with other ethnicities. Three measures were used to test this proposition: intermarriage, friendship, and neighborhood. The findings revealed that acceptance of other ethnicities/religions as opposed to Muslims was higher than that of their parents. However, the gap narrows significantly between participants and their parents on the following two measures: “going out with” and “marrying” Muslims. Secondly, on the measures of “going out”, “being friends” with, and “marrying” someone from other ethnicities/religions, participants responses were more favorable than those conveyed towards Muslim groups. We suggest that future research is extended to measure other variables, namely gender, children of Muslim–Christian intermarriage, and the post effects of the shooting incidents in Christchurch on 15 March 2019.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is a peer reviewed research journal produced by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) as part of its publication programme. Published since 1979, the journalhas firmly established itself as a highly respected and widely acclaimed academic and scholarly publication providing accurate, reliable and objective information. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs provides a forum for frank but responsible discussion of issues relating to the life of Muslims in non-Muslim societies. The journalhas become increasingly influential as the subject of Muslim minorities has acquired added significance. About 500 million Muslims, fully one third of the world Muslim population of 1.5 billion, live as minorities in 149 countries around the globe. Even as minorities they form significant communities within their countries of residence. What kind of life do they live? What are their social, political and economic problems? How do they perceive their strengths and weakness? What above all, is their future in Islam and in the communities of their residence? The journal explores these and similar questions from the Muslim and international point of view in a serious and responsible manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信