组合模型在离散二值分类中的性能

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Anabela Marques, A. Ferreira, Margarida M. G. S. Cardoso
{"title":"组合模型在离散二值分类中的性能","authors":"Anabela Marques, A. Ferreira, Margarida M. G. S. Cardoso","doi":"10.1027/1614-2241/a000117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diverse Discrete Discriminant Analysis (DDA) models perform differently in different samples. This fact has encouraged research in combined models which seems particularly promising when the a priori classes are not well separated or when small or moderate sized samples are considered, which often occurs in practice. In this study, we evaluate the performance of a convex combination of two DDA models: the First-Order Independence Model (FOIM) and the Dependence Trees Model (DTM). We use simulated data sets with two classes and consider diverse data complexity factors which may influence performance of the combined model – the separation of classes, balance, and number of missing states, as well as sample size and also the number of parameters to be estimated in DDA. We resort to cross-validation to evaluate the precision of classification. The results obtained illustrate the advantage of the proposed combination when compared with FOIM and DTM: it yields the best results, especially when very small samples are considered. The experimental study also provides a ranking of the data complexity factors, according to their relative impact on classification performance, by means of a regression model. It leads to the conclusion that the separation of classes is the most influential factor in classification performance. The ratio between the number of degrees of freedom and sample size, along with the proportion of missing states in the minority class, also has significant impact on classification performance. An additional gain of this study, also deriving from the estimated regression model, is the ability to successfully predict the precision of classification in a real data set based on the data complexity factors.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Combined Models in Discrete Binary Classification\",\"authors\":\"Anabela Marques, A. Ferreira, Margarida M. G. S. Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1614-2241/a000117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diverse Discrete Discriminant Analysis (DDA) models perform differently in different samples. This fact has encouraged research in combined models which seems particularly promising when the a priori classes are not well separated or when small or moderate sized samples are considered, which often occurs in practice. In this study, we evaluate the performance of a convex combination of two DDA models: the First-Order Independence Model (FOIM) and the Dependence Trees Model (DTM). We use simulated data sets with two classes and consider diverse data complexity factors which may influence performance of the combined model – the separation of classes, balance, and number of missing states, as well as sample size and also the number of parameters to be estimated in DDA. We resort to cross-validation to evaluate the precision of classification. The results obtained illustrate the advantage of the proposed combination when compared with FOIM and DTM: it yields the best results, especially when very small samples are considered. The experimental study also provides a ranking of the data complexity factors, according to their relative impact on classification performance, by means of a regression model. It leads to the conclusion that the separation of classes is the most influential factor in classification performance. The ratio between the number of degrees of freedom and sample size, along with the proportion of missing states in the minority class, also has significant impact on classification performance. An additional gain of this study, also deriving from the estimated regression model, is the ability to successfully predict the precision of classification in a real data set based on the data complexity factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同的离散判别分析(DDA)模型在不同的样本中表现不同。这一事实鼓励了对组合模型的研究,当先验类没有很好地分离时,或者当考虑小或中等大小的样本时,这似乎特别有希望,这在实践中经常发生。在本研究中,我们评估了两个DDA模型的凸组合的性能:一阶独立模型(FOIM)和依赖树模型(DTM)。我们使用具有两个类别的模拟数据集,并考虑可能影响组合模型性能的各种数据复杂性因素——类别的分离、平衡和缺失状态的数量,以及样本大小和DDA中要估计的参数数量。我们采用交叉验证来评估分类的准确性。与FOIM和DTM相比,所获得的结果说明了所提出的组合的优势:它产生了最好的结果,尤其是在考虑非常小的样本时。实验研究还通过回归模型,根据数据复杂性因素对分类性能的相对影响,对数据复杂性因素进行了排名。结果表明,类的分离是影响分类性能的最大因素。自由度数量和样本量之间的比率,以及少数类中缺失状态的比例,也对分类性能有显著影响。这项研究的另一个收获,也是从估计的回归模型中得出的,是基于数据复杂性因素成功预测真实数据集中分类精度的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of Combined Models in Discrete Binary Classification
Diverse Discrete Discriminant Analysis (DDA) models perform differently in different samples. This fact has encouraged research in combined models which seems particularly promising when the a priori classes are not well separated or when small or moderate sized samples are considered, which often occurs in practice. In this study, we evaluate the performance of a convex combination of two DDA models: the First-Order Independence Model (FOIM) and the Dependence Trees Model (DTM). We use simulated data sets with two classes and consider diverse data complexity factors which may influence performance of the combined model – the separation of classes, balance, and number of missing states, as well as sample size and also the number of parameters to be estimated in DDA. We resort to cross-validation to evaluate the precision of classification. The results obtained illustrate the advantage of the proposed combination when compared with FOIM and DTM: it yields the best results, especially when very small samples are considered. The experimental study also provides a ranking of the data complexity factors, according to their relative impact on classification performance, by means of a regression model. It leads to the conclusion that the separation of classes is the most influential factor in classification performance. The ratio between the number of degrees of freedom and sample size, along with the proportion of missing states in the minority class, also has significant impact on classification performance. An additional gain of this study, also deriving from the estimated regression model, is the ability to successfully predict the precision of classification in a real data set based on the data complexity factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信