基于模糊故障树分析法的雅兰井喷风险定量评价

Mostafa Satiarvand, N. Orak, K. Varshosaz, M. Cheraghi, E. Mobarak Hassan
{"title":"基于模糊故障树分析法的雅兰井喷风险定量评价","authors":"Mostafa Satiarvand, N. Orak, K. Varshosaz, M. Cheraghi, E. Mobarak Hassan","doi":"10.18502/aoh.v6i4.11731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Blowout is one of the most significant accidents in the drilling industry. Because of a shared field with a neighboring country and is located on Hur al-Azim wetland, Yaran Oil Field in the west of Ahwaz city needs special attention in terms of blowout control.  \nMethods: Four main events including kick prevention, kick detection, failure in the blowout preventer, and blowout occurrence have been identified by expert interviews and field studies as top events. Each top event by fault tree method was analyzed and its intermediate and basic causes were identified. The oil field includes 20 wells and one well was selected for the study. In this study, the fuzzy fault tree analysis method was used to assess the failure rate of events leading to a blowout. \n Results:  Based on the obtained results, the failure rate in kick prevention has been estimated to be 0.2863, the failure rate in kick detection 0.3878, the failure rate of blowout preventer 0.08443, the failure rate of a blowout from the first path 0.011, and the failure rate of a blowout from the second paths has been estimated to be 0.0286. In the event of kick prevention, hydrostatic pressure reduction with a failure rate of 0.227, in the event of kick detection, the failure rate of change in mud volume and change in current volume were 0.1462 and 0.133 respectively.  \nConclusion: The results have been used to better understand the blowout and prevention actions and prevent losses due to the blowout.","PeriodicalId":32672,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Occupational Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Assessment of Risks Caused by Blowout in Yaran with Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Satiarvand, N. Orak, K. Varshosaz, M. Cheraghi, E. Mobarak Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/aoh.v6i4.11731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Blowout is one of the most significant accidents in the drilling industry. Because of a shared field with a neighboring country and is located on Hur al-Azim wetland, Yaran Oil Field in the west of Ahwaz city needs special attention in terms of blowout control.  \\nMethods: Four main events including kick prevention, kick detection, failure in the blowout preventer, and blowout occurrence have been identified by expert interviews and field studies as top events. Each top event by fault tree method was analyzed and its intermediate and basic causes were identified. The oil field includes 20 wells and one well was selected for the study. In this study, the fuzzy fault tree analysis method was used to assess the failure rate of events leading to a blowout. \\n Results:  Based on the obtained results, the failure rate in kick prevention has been estimated to be 0.2863, the failure rate in kick detection 0.3878, the failure rate of blowout preventer 0.08443, the failure rate of a blowout from the first path 0.011, and the failure rate of a blowout from the second paths has been estimated to be 0.0286. In the event of kick prevention, hydrostatic pressure reduction with a failure rate of 0.227, in the event of kick detection, the failure rate of change in mud volume and change in current volume were 0.1462 and 0.133 respectively.  \\nConclusion: The results have been used to better understand the blowout and prevention actions and prevent losses due to the blowout.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Occupational Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Occupational Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/aoh.v6i4.11731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aoh.v6i4.11731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:井喷是钻井行业中最严重的事故之一。Ahwaz市西部的Yaran油田位于Hur al-Azim湿地上,与邻国共有油田,因此在井喷控制方面需要特别注意。方法:通过专家访谈和现场研究,将井涌预防、井涌检测、防喷器故障和井喷发生四个主要事件确定为首要事件。采用故障树方法对每个顶部事件进行分析,找出其中间原因和基本原因。该油田包括20口井,并选择了一口井进行研究。在本研究中,使用模糊故障树分析方法来评估导致井喷事件的失败率。结果:根据所获得的结果,井涌预防的失败率估计为0.2863,井涌检测的失败率为0.3878,防喷器的失败率0.08443,第一路径井喷的失败率0.011,第二路径井喷的错误率估计为0.0286。在井涌预防、静水压降低故障率为0.227的情况下,在井涌检测的情况下泥浆体积变化和电流体积变化故障率分别为0.1462和0.133。结论:研究结果有助于更好地了解井喷及预防措施,防止井喷造成的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Assessment of Risks Caused by Blowout in Yaran with Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis
Background: Blowout is one of the most significant accidents in the drilling industry. Because of a shared field with a neighboring country and is located on Hur al-Azim wetland, Yaran Oil Field in the west of Ahwaz city needs special attention in terms of blowout control.  Methods: Four main events including kick prevention, kick detection, failure in the blowout preventer, and blowout occurrence have been identified by expert interviews and field studies as top events. Each top event by fault tree method was analyzed and its intermediate and basic causes were identified. The oil field includes 20 wells and one well was selected for the study. In this study, the fuzzy fault tree analysis method was used to assess the failure rate of events leading to a blowout.  Results:  Based on the obtained results, the failure rate in kick prevention has been estimated to be 0.2863, the failure rate in kick detection 0.3878, the failure rate of blowout preventer 0.08443, the failure rate of a blowout from the first path 0.011, and the failure rate of a blowout from the second paths has been estimated to be 0.0286. In the event of kick prevention, hydrostatic pressure reduction with a failure rate of 0.227, in the event of kick detection, the failure rate of change in mud volume and change in current volume were 0.1462 and 0.133 respectively.  Conclusion: The results have been used to better understand the blowout and prevention actions and prevent losses due to the blowout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信