在环形交叉路口调查特定碰撞类型的可能性

K. Somasundaraswaran, M. Richardson
{"title":"在环形交叉路口调查特定碰撞类型的可能性","authors":"K. Somasundaraswaran, M. Richardson","doi":"10.17265/2328-2142/2019.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": A comprehensive analysis of road crashes is extremely supportive in identifying existing deficiencies and in proposing new the design strategies. There are several research studies carried out for improving safety at roundabouts with the aim to altering conflict types, reducing the drivers’ speeds and crash severity, and highlighting a considerable differences in the safety performance of individual or group of roundabouts. The main purpose in this study was to explain the correlation between the types of crashes to the geometry of the roundabouts based on data collected from ten top poorly performing roundabouts in Toowoomba, Australia. Preliminary analysis revealed the following as top three types as prominent at these identified roundabouts such as angle crashes (74%), hit-object crashes (13%), and Rear-end crashes (9%). Excess proportion of specific crash method has been used as methodological tool to estimate the potential possibilities for a specific crash type exceeding threshold at each roundabout. Results show that eight out of ten roundabouts were regarded for a particular type of crash but only two roundabouts were viewed for two types of crashes such as angle and hit-object.","PeriodicalId":62390,"journal":{"name":"交通与运输工程:英文版","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Possibilities of Specific Crash Type at Roundabouts\",\"authors\":\"K. Somasundaraswaran, M. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/2328-2142/2019.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": A comprehensive analysis of road crashes is extremely supportive in identifying existing deficiencies and in proposing new the design strategies. There are several research studies carried out for improving safety at roundabouts with the aim to altering conflict types, reducing the drivers’ speeds and crash severity, and highlighting a considerable differences in the safety performance of individual or group of roundabouts. The main purpose in this study was to explain the correlation between the types of crashes to the geometry of the roundabouts based on data collected from ten top poorly performing roundabouts in Toowoomba, Australia. Preliminary analysis revealed the following as top three types as prominent at these identified roundabouts such as angle crashes (74%), hit-object crashes (13%), and Rear-end crashes (9%). Excess proportion of specific crash method has been used as methodological tool to estimate the potential possibilities for a specific crash type exceeding threshold at each roundabout. Results show that eight out of ten roundabouts were regarded for a particular type of crash but only two roundabouts were viewed for two types of crashes such as angle and hit-object.\",\"PeriodicalId\":62390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"交通与运输工程:英文版\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"交通与运输工程:英文版\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2142/2019.05.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"交通与运输工程:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2142/2019.05.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对道路交通事故进行全面分析,对找出现有的不足之处和提出新的设计策略非常有帮助。为了提高环形交叉路口的安全性,已经开展了几项研究,旨在改变冲突类型,降低驾驶员的速度和碰撞严重程度,并强调单个或组环形交叉路口的安全性能存在相当大的差异。本研究的主要目的是根据从澳大利亚Toowoomba的十个表现最差的环形交叉路口收集的数据,解释碰撞类型与环形交叉路口几何形状之间的相关性。初步分析显示,在这些已确定的环形交叉路口,最主要的三种事故类型是:角度碰撞(74%)、撞击物体碰撞(13%)和追尾碰撞(9%)。采用特定碰撞的超额比例法作为方法工具,对环形交叉路口某一特定碰撞类型超过阈值的潜在可能性进行了估计。结果显示,10个环形交叉路口中有8个被认为是特定类型的碰撞,但只有2个环形交叉路口被认为是两种类型的碰撞,如角度和撞击对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Possibilities of Specific Crash Type at Roundabouts
: A comprehensive analysis of road crashes is extremely supportive in identifying existing deficiencies and in proposing new the design strategies. There are several research studies carried out for improving safety at roundabouts with the aim to altering conflict types, reducing the drivers’ speeds and crash severity, and highlighting a considerable differences in the safety performance of individual or group of roundabouts. The main purpose in this study was to explain the correlation between the types of crashes to the geometry of the roundabouts based on data collected from ten top poorly performing roundabouts in Toowoomba, Australia. Preliminary analysis revealed the following as top three types as prominent at these identified roundabouts such as angle crashes (74%), hit-object crashes (13%), and Rear-end crashes (9%). Excess proportion of specific crash method has been used as methodological tool to estimate the potential possibilities for a specific crash type exceeding threshold at each roundabout. Results show that eight out of ten roundabouts were regarded for a particular type of crash but only two roundabouts were viewed for two types of crashes such as angle and hit-object.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信