中国“一带一路”倡议的“马赫-金德”地缘政治解释

Q3 Social Sciences
Adam Leong Kok Wey
{"title":"中国“一带一路”倡议的“马赫-金德”地缘政治解释","authors":"Adam Leong Kok Wey","doi":"10.1080/01495933.2021.2017745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has garnered a lot of attention, and worries about its impact and influence over Eurasia and Indo-Pacific. Two classical geopoliticians – Halford J. Mackinder and Alfred Thayer Mahan – had provided useful frameworks to explain China’s BRI geopolitical implications, and geostrategies to dominate the Eurasian continent and Indo-Pacific waterways with economic tools and infrastructure projects. This article claims that China’s BRI is a testament of the exceptional explanatory power of classical geopolitical theories in the practice of grand strategy in international politics.","PeriodicalId":35161,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Strategy","volume":"41 1","pages":"203 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A “Mah-Kinder” geopolitical explanation of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)\",\"authors\":\"Adam Leong Kok Wey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01495933.2021.2017745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has garnered a lot of attention, and worries about its impact and influence over Eurasia and Indo-Pacific. Two classical geopoliticians – Halford J. Mackinder and Alfred Thayer Mahan – had provided useful frameworks to explain China’s BRI geopolitical implications, and geostrategies to dominate the Eurasian continent and Indo-Pacific waterways with economic tools and infrastructure projects. This article claims that China’s BRI is a testament of the exceptional explanatory power of classical geopolitical theories in the practice of grand strategy in international politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Strategy\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"203 - 211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2021.2017745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2021.2017745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中国的“一带一路”倡议引起了广泛关注,并对其对欧亚大陆和印太地区的影响和影响感到担忧。两位经典地缘政治学家——Halford J. Mackinder和Alfred Thayer Mahan——提供了有用的框架来解释中国的“一带一路”地缘政治影响,以及通过经济工具和基础设施项目主导欧亚大陆和印度太平洋水道的地缘战略。本文认为,中国的“一带一路”倡议证明了经典地缘政治理论在国际政治大战略实践中的卓越解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A “Mah-Kinder” geopolitical explanation of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
Abstract China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has garnered a lot of attention, and worries about its impact and influence over Eurasia and Indo-Pacific. Two classical geopoliticians – Halford J. Mackinder and Alfred Thayer Mahan – had provided useful frameworks to explain China’s BRI geopolitical implications, and geostrategies to dominate the Eurasian continent and Indo-Pacific waterways with economic tools and infrastructure projects. This article claims that China’s BRI is a testament of the exceptional explanatory power of classical geopolitical theories in the practice of grand strategy in international politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Strategy
Comparative Strategy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信