就英国建筑、工程和建筑行业实施iso14001达成专家意见共识

Q4 Environmental Science
R. Horry, C. Booth, Abdul–Majeed Mahamadu
{"title":"就英国建筑、工程和建筑行业实施iso14001达成专家意见共识","authors":"R. Horry, C. Booth, Abdul–Majeed Mahamadu","doi":"10.2495/sdp220281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As society places greater emphasis on sustainability and environmental management, particularly within the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) sectors, it is vital to understand the effectiveness of the tools available to deliver change in these areas. The AEC sectors contribute to a significant impact on the environment, both in terms of materials used and waste produced. They are also seen as being environmentally negative. Therefore, the use of ISO14001 is of increasing importance in terms of demonstrating a commitment to working towards being more sustainable within their operations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of an expert panel of environmental management professionals working within the AEC sectors on the benefits and barriers of implementing ISO14001. A Delphi study was conducted, which consisted of two rounds (Round–1 involved n=15 participants; Round–2 involved n=9 participants). The participants were asked to independently rank 145 statements (comprising: n=86 benefits; n=59 barriers), across n=17 categories, which were derived from ISO 14001 and AEC literature. After two survey rounds and weighted average analysis, the results reveal the highest ranked benefits are: (i) improved relationships with stakeholders, (ii) tender requirement, (iii) community participation, (iv) industry standards, (v) efficient operations, (vi) employee environmental awareness, (vii) cost savings through energy efficiency and (viii) improved environmental performance; whilst the highest ranked barriers are: (i) open to public scrutiny, (ii) costs involved, (iii) top management commitment towards implementation (iv) lack of link to EIA, (v) public not interested; (vi) lack of support to assist staff; and (vii) legal compliance. However, unlike previous Delphi studies that have sought to gather consensus, most participants in this study were unwilling to shift their opinions towards a shared middle–ground. Therefore, whilst the survey results enlighten our appreciations of ISO14001 implementation within the AEC sectors, they also indicate significant differences in opinion by different environmental management professionals.","PeriodicalId":35178,"journal":{"name":"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TOWARDS A CONSENSUS OF EXPERT OPINIONS ON IMPLEMENTING ISO 14001 IN THE ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SECTORS OF THE UK\",\"authors\":\"R. Horry, C. Booth, Abdul–Majeed Mahamadu\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/sdp220281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As society places greater emphasis on sustainability and environmental management, particularly within the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) sectors, it is vital to understand the effectiveness of the tools available to deliver change in these areas. The AEC sectors contribute to a significant impact on the environment, both in terms of materials used and waste produced. They are also seen as being environmentally negative. Therefore, the use of ISO14001 is of increasing importance in terms of demonstrating a commitment to working towards being more sustainable within their operations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of an expert panel of environmental management professionals working within the AEC sectors on the benefits and barriers of implementing ISO14001. A Delphi study was conducted, which consisted of two rounds (Round–1 involved n=15 participants; Round–2 involved n=9 participants). The participants were asked to independently rank 145 statements (comprising: n=86 benefits; n=59 barriers), across n=17 categories, which were derived from ISO 14001 and AEC literature. After two survey rounds and weighted average analysis, the results reveal the highest ranked benefits are: (i) improved relationships with stakeholders, (ii) tender requirement, (iii) community participation, (iv) industry standards, (v) efficient operations, (vi) employee environmental awareness, (vii) cost savings through energy efficiency and (viii) improved environmental performance; whilst the highest ranked barriers are: (i) open to public scrutiny, (ii) costs involved, (iii) top management commitment towards implementation (iv) lack of link to EIA, (v) public not interested; (vi) lack of support to assist staff; and (vii) legal compliance. However, unlike previous Delphi studies that have sought to gather consensus, most participants in this study were unwilling to shift their opinions towards a shared middle–ground. Therefore, whilst the survey results enlighten our appreciations of ISO14001 implementation within the AEC sectors, they also indicate significant differences in opinion by different environmental management professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/sdp220281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/sdp220281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着社会越来越重视可持续发展和环境管理,特别是在建筑、工程和施工(AEC)领域,了解这些领域中可用的工具的有效性是至关重要的。AEC部门在使用的材料和产生的废物方面对环境产生了重大影响。它们也被视为对环境不利。因此,使用ISO14001对于在他们的运作中向更可持续的方向努力的承诺是越来越重要的。因此,本研究的目的是揭示一个由在AEC部门工作的环境管理专业人员组成的专家组对实施ISO14001的好处和障碍的意见。进行德尔菲研究,该研究包括两轮(第一轮涉及n=15名参与者;第二轮涉及n=9名参与者)。参与者被要求对145个陈述进行独立排名(包括:n=86个利益;n=59个障碍),跨越n=17个类别,来源于ISO 14001和AEC文献。经过两轮调查和加权平均分析,结果显示,排名最高的效益是:(i)改善与利益相关者的关系,(ii)招标要求,(iii)社区参与,(iv)行业标准,(v)高效运营,(vi)员工环保意识,(vii)通过能源效率节省成本,(viii)改善环境绩效;而排名最高的障碍是:(i)公开接受公众监督;(ii)所涉及的成本;(iii)最高管理层对实施的承诺;(iv)缺乏与环评的联系;(v)公众不感兴趣;缺乏协助工作人员的支助;(七)法律合规性。然而,不像以前的德尔菲研究,已经寻求收集共识,在这项研究中的大多数参与者不愿意改变他们的意见向一个共同的中间立场。因此,调查结果在启发我们对AEC行业实施ISO14001的评价的同时,也显示了不同环境管理专业人士的意见存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TOWARDS A CONSENSUS OF EXPERT OPINIONS ON IMPLEMENTING ISO 14001 IN THE ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SECTORS OF THE UK
As society places greater emphasis on sustainability and environmental management, particularly within the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) sectors, it is vital to understand the effectiveness of the tools available to deliver change in these areas. The AEC sectors contribute to a significant impact on the environment, both in terms of materials used and waste produced. They are also seen as being environmentally negative. Therefore, the use of ISO14001 is of increasing importance in terms of demonstrating a commitment to working towards being more sustainable within their operations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of an expert panel of environmental management professionals working within the AEC sectors on the benefits and barriers of implementing ISO14001. A Delphi study was conducted, which consisted of two rounds (Round–1 involved n=15 participants; Round–2 involved n=9 participants). The participants were asked to independently rank 145 statements (comprising: n=86 benefits; n=59 barriers), across n=17 categories, which were derived from ISO 14001 and AEC literature. After two survey rounds and weighted average analysis, the results reveal the highest ranked benefits are: (i) improved relationships with stakeholders, (ii) tender requirement, (iii) community participation, (iv) industry standards, (v) efficient operations, (vi) employee environmental awareness, (vii) cost savings through energy efficiency and (viii) improved environmental performance; whilst the highest ranked barriers are: (i) open to public scrutiny, (ii) costs involved, (iii) top management commitment towards implementation (iv) lack of link to EIA, (v) public not interested; (vi) lack of support to assist staff; and (vii) legal compliance. However, unlike previous Delphi studies that have sought to gather consensus, most participants in this study were unwilling to shift their opinions towards a shared middle–ground. Therefore, whilst the survey results enlighten our appreciations of ISO14001 implementation within the AEC sectors, they also indicate significant differences in opinion by different environmental management professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment (ISSN: 1743-3541) includes volumes relating to the follow subject areas: Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Water Resources, Air Pollution, Design & Nature, Sustainable Development, Environmental Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信