分离的权力和种族主义:伯克利的斯托克利·卡迈克尔

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1080/15362426.2019.1671705

J. D. Hatch

{"title":"分离的权力和种族主义:伯克利的斯托克利·卡迈克尔","authors":"J. D. Hatch","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2019.1671705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT An analysis of Stokely Carmichael’s dissociation of “racism” attempted at UC Berkeley on October 29, 1966 extends the utility of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “dissociation of concepts” for those seeking racial justice. I offer a new term “subversive dissociations” to theorize the foundations of racist dominant narratives as what Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca call “linguistic common property.” This move reframes dissociative challenges to dominant narratives as attempts to counter other dissociations and thus makes available a set of tools outlined in The New Rhetoric for that purpose. Dissociation emerges as a dynamic anti-racist strategy.","PeriodicalId":38049,"journal":{"name":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","volume":"22 1","pages":"303 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671705","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissociating Power and Racism: Stokely Carmichael at Berkeley\",\"authors\":\"J. D. Hatch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15362426.2019.1671705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT An analysis of Stokely Carmichael’s dissociation of “racism” attempted at UC Berkeley on October 29, 1966 extends the utility of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “dissociation of concepts” for those seeking racial justice. I offer a new term “subversive dissociations” to theorize the foundations of racist dominant narratives as what Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca call “linguistic common property.” This move reframes dissociative challenges to dominant narratives as attempts to counter other dissociations and thus makes available a set of tools outlined in The New Rhetoric for that purpose. Dissociation emerges as a dynamic anti-racist strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"303 - 325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671705\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

对斯托克利·卡迈克尔1966年10月29日在加州大学伯克利分校提出的“种族主义的分离”理论的分析，扩展了佩雷尔曼和奥尔布雷希茨-泰特卡的“概念的分离”理论对寻求种族正义的人的效用。我提出了一个新的术语“颠覆性分离”，将种族主义主导叙事的基础理论化，就像佩雷尔曼和奥尔布雷希茨-泰特卡所说的“语言共同属性”。这一举动重新定义了对主导叙事的解离挑战，试图对抗其他解离，从而使《新修辞学》中概述的一套工具成为可能。分离是一种动态的反种族主义策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Dissociating Power and Racism: Stokely Carmichael at Berkeley

ABSTRACT An analysis of Stokely Carmichael’s dissociation of “racism” attempted at UC Berkeley on October 29, 1966 extends the utility of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “dissociation of concepts” for those seeking racial justice. I offer a new term “subversive dissociations” to theorize the foundations of racist dominant narratives as what Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca call “linguistic common property.” This move reframes dissociative challenges to dominant narratives as attempts to counter other dissociations and thus makes available a set of tools outlined in The New Rhetoric for that purpose. Dissociation emerges as a dynamic anti-racist strategy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量