圣训学者对AHL AL-RA ' y MADHHAB的辩护(思想研究sheikh ' Abd al- fatatth Abû Ghuddah)

Adi Abdullah Muslim
{"title":"圣训学者对AHL AL-RA ' y MADHHAB的辩护(思想研究sheikh ' Abd al- fatatth Abû Ghuddah)","authors":"Adi Abdullah Muslim","doi":"10.24014/JUSH.V27I1.4594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debate between hadith scholar and Islamic jurisprudence has occurred since the time of the founding of fiqh madhhab that was dominated by Imam Abû Hanîfah in Kufah (as a representation of ra’y), and Imam Malik in Medina (as a representation of hadith scholar). Then the figure of Imam al-Shafi’i emerged as the mediator for them, he was given the title Nasir al-Sunnah. This study explains the existence of scholars of hadith - Shaikh Abd al-Fattâh Abû Ghuddah - who adhered to Ahl al-Ra’y madhhab of Imam Abû Hanîfah, defended the accusations against his madhhab, and also wanted to prove that Imam Abû Hanîfah was a textualist. This is a library research using content analysis. This study indicated that Imam Abû Hanîfah who was held by Abû Ghuddah as Ahl-al-ra’y madhhab did not make his madhhab understanding be rationalist in the field of hadith. He often in issuing fatwas based on ra’y. As a textualist cleric, he put nash in perseverance not prioritize qiyas and reason","PeriodicalId":17770,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE DEFENSE OF HADITH SCHOLARS AGAINST AHL AL-RA’Y MADHHAB (Study of Thought Shaikh ‘Abd al-Fattâh Abû Ghuddah)\",\"authors\":\"Adi Abdullah Muslim\",\"doi\":\"10.24014/JUSH.V27I1.4594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debate between hadith scholar and Islamic jurisprudence has occurred since the time of the founding of fiqh madhhab that was dominated by Imam Abû Hanîfah in Kufah (as a representation of ra’y), and Imam Malik in Medina (as a representation of hadith scholar). Then the figure of Imam al-Shafi’i emerged as the mediator for them, he was given the title Nasir al-Sunnah. This study explains the existence of scholars of hadith - Shaikh Abd al-Fattâh Abû Ghuddah - who adhered to Ahl al-Ra’y madhhab of Imam Abû Hanîfah, defended the accusations against his madhhab, and also wanted to prove that Imam Abû Hanîfah was a textualist. This is a library research using content analysis. This study indicated that Imam Abû Hanîfah who was held by Abû Ghuddah as Ahl-al-ra’y madhhab did not make his madhhab understanding be rationalist in the field of hadith. He often in issuing fatwas based on ra’y. As a textualist cleric, he put nash in perseverance not prioritize qiyas and reason\",\"PeriodicalId\":17770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24014/JUSH.V27I1.4594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/JUSH.V27I1.4594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

圣训学者和伊斯兰法理学之间的争论,从古法的伊玛目Abû hanfah(代表拉伊)和麦地那的伊玛目Malik(代表圣训学者)主导的fiqh madhhab建立以来就一直存在。然后,伊玛目沙菲伊作为他们的调解人出现了,他被授予纳西尔·逊纳的称号。这项研究解释了圣训学者——谢赫·阿卜杜勒·法特·Abû古达赫——的存在,他坚持伊玛目Abû han法的Ahl al-Ra 'y madhhab,为对他的madhhab的指控辩护,并想证明伊玛目Abû han法是一个文本学家。这是一个使用内容分析的图书馆研究。这项研究表明,伊玛目Abû hanfah虽然被Abû古达达认定为Ahl-al-ra 'y madhab,但他对madhab的理解在圣训领域并不是理性主义的。他经常发布以宗教为基础的教令。作为一名经书派教士,他把纳什置于坚持不懈的状态,而不是优先考虑齐雅和理性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE DEFENSE OF HADITH SCHOLARS AGAINST AHL AL-RA’Y MADHHAB (Study of Thought Shaikh ‘Abd al-Fattâh Abû Ghuddah)
Debate between hadith scholar and Islamic jurisprudence has occurred since the time of the founding of fiqh madhhab that was dominated by Imam Abû Hanîfah in Kufah (as a representation of ra’y), and Imam Malik in Medina (as a representation of hadith scholar). Then the figure of Imam al-Shafi’i emerged as the mediator for them, he was given the title Nasir al-Sunnah. This study explains the existence of scholars of hadith - Shaikh Abd al-Fattâh Abû Ghuddah - who adhered to Ahl al-Ra’y madhhab of Imam Abû Hanîfah, defended the accusations against his madhhab, and also wanted to prove that Imam Abû Hanîfah was a textualist. This is a library research using content analysis. This study indicated that Imam Abû Hanîfah who was held by Abû Ghuddah as Ahl-al-ra’y madhhab did not make his madhhab understanding be rationalist in the field of hadith. He often in issuing fatwas based on ra’y. As a textualist cleric, he put nash in perseverance not prioritize qiyas and reason
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信