《夫妻,小公司》:论罗伯特·邓肯与感伤现代主义

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Kylan Rice
{"title":"《夫妻,小公司》:论罗伯特·邓肯与感伤现代主义","authors":"Kylan Rice","doi":"10.1353/arq.2020.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Central to Robert Duncan’s cosmopolitan, transhistorical mega-coteries is a mode of literary production that holds the poem as a catalyst for intimacies that open into the public sphere. Duncan’s queer poetics of coupling and bundling has an ultimately anarchic effect that moves beyond his account of modernism’s insular elite communities and toward a “symposium of the whole.” The poet’s emphasis on the intimate dimensions of poetic Eros foreshadow what scholars have called “sentimental modernism,” which links modernism (and, with this essay, postmodernism’s Open Field) to nineteenth-century women’s writing and sentimentalism. To show how Duncan helps build this bridge, I compare the couples and threesomes mobilized to articulate a theory of poetry in The H.D. Book (1959–1964) to the spiritualist metaphysics of Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s sentimental novel The Gates Ajar (1868), showing how both describe intimacies that culminate in a “communion of saints” in the present.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"76 1","pages":"113 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2020.0014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“In Couples, In Small Companies”: On Robert Duncan and Sentimental Modernism\",\"authors\":\"Kylan Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/arq.2020.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Central to Robert Duncan’s cosmopolitan, transhistorical mega-coteries is a mode of literary production that holds the poem as a catalyst for intimacies that open into the public sphere. Duncan’s queer poetics of coupling and bundling has an ultimately anarchic effect that moves beyond his account of modernism’s insular elite communities and toward a “symposium of the whole.” The poet’s emphasis on the intimate dimensions of poetic Eros foreshadow what scholars have called “sentimental modernism,” which links modernism (and, with this essay, postmodernism’s Open Field) to nineteenth-century women’s writing and sentimentalism. To show how Duncan helps build this bridge, I compare the couples and threesomes mobilized to articulate a theory of poetry in The H.D. Book (1959–1964) to the spiritualist metaphysics of Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s sentimental novel The Gates Ajar (1868), showing how both describe intimacies that culminate in a “communion of saints” in the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2020.0014\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2020.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2020.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:罗伯特·邓肯(Robert Duncan)的世界主义、跨历史的大群体的核心是一种文学生产模式,这种模式将诗歌作为一种催化剂,促进进入公共领域的亲密关系。邓肯关于耦合和捆绑的酷儿诗学最终产生了一种无政府主义的效果,超越了他对现代主义孤立的精英社区的描述,走向了“整体的研讨会”。诗人对诗意的爱欲的亲密维度的强调预示着学者们所谓的“感伤的现代主义”,它将现代主义(以及这篇文章中的后现代主义的开放领域)与19世纪女性的写作和感伤主义联系起来。为了展示邓肯是如何帮助建立起这座桥梁的,我将《H.D. Book》(1959-1964)中为表达诗歌理论而动员起来的夫妻和三人与伊丽莎白·斯图尔特·菲尔普斯(Elizabeth Stuart Phelps)的感伤小说《阿加尔之门》(1868)中的唯心主义形而上学进行了比较,展示了两者是如何描述亲密关系的,这些亲密关系最终以“圣徒的交流”而达到高潮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“In Couples, In Small Companies”: On Robert Duncan and Sentimental Modernism
Abstract:Central to Robert Duncan’s cosmopolitan, transhistorical mega-coteries is a mode of literary production that holds the poem as a catalyst for intimacies that open into the public sphere. Duncan’s queer poetics of coupling and bundling has an ultimately anarchic effect that moves beyond his account of modernism’s insular elite communities and toward a “symposium of the whole.” The poet’s emphasis on the intimate dimensions of poetic Eros foreshadow what scholars have called “sentimental modernism,” which links modernism (and, with this essay, postmodernism’s Open Field) to nineteenth-century women’s writing and sentimentalism. To show how Duncan helps build this bridge, I compare the couples and threesomes mobilized to articulate a theory of poetry in The H.D. Book (1959–1964) to the spiritualist metaphysics of Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s sentimental novel The Gates Ajar (1868), showing how both describe intimacies that culminate in a “communion of saints” in the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信