社区驱动的城市河流恢复:可持续和有弹性的城市生态系统的愿景

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Freshwater Science Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1086/721150
M. Scoggins, D. Booth, T. Fletcher, M. Fork, Ana M González, R. Hale, R. Hawley, A. Roy, E. E. Bilger, N. Bond, M. J. Burns, K. Hopkins, K. Macneale, E. Martí, S. McKay, M. Neale, M. Paul, B. Ríos-Touma, Kathryn L. Russell, Robert F. Smith, S. Wagner, S. Wenger
{"title":"社区驱动的城市河流恢复:可持续和有弹性的城市生态系统的愿景","authors":"M. Scoggins, D. Booth, T. Fletcher, M. Fork, Ana M González, R. Hale, R. Hawley, A. Roy, E. E. Bilger, N. Bond, M. J. Burns, K. Hopkins, K. Macneale, E. Martí, S. McKay, M. Neale, M. Paul, B. Ríos-Touma, Kathryn L. Russell, Robert F. Smith, S. Wagner, S. Wenger","doi":"10.1086/721150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban streams can provide amenities to people living in cities, but those benefits are reduced when streams become degraded, potentially even causing harm (disease, toxic compounds, etc.). Governments and institutions invest resources to improve the values and services provided by urban streams; however, the conception, development, and implementation of such projects may not include meaningful involvement of community members and other stakeholders. Consequently, project objectives may be misaligned with community desires and needs, and projects may fail to achieve their goals. In February 2020, the 5th Symposium on Urbanization and Stream Ecology, an interdisciplinary meeting held every 3 to 5 y, met in Austin, Texas, USA, to explore new approaches to urban stream projects, including ways to maximize the full range of potential benefits by better integrating community members into project identification and decision making. The symposium included in-depth discussion about 4 nearby field case studies, participation of multidisciplinary urban stream experts from 5 continents, and input from the Austin community. Institutional barriers to community inclusion were identified and analyzed using real-world examples, both from the case studies and from the literature, which clarified disparities in power, equity, and values. Outcomes of the symposium have been aggregated into a vision that challenges the present institutional approach to urban stream management and a set of strategies to systematically address these barriers to improve restoration solutions. Integrating community members and other stakeholders throughout the urban restoration process, and a transparent decision-making process to resolve divergent objectives, can help identify appropriate goals for realizing both the ecological and social benefits of stream restoration.","PeriodicalId":48926,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Science","volume":"41 1","pages":"404 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"M. Scoggins, D. Booth, T. Fletcher, M. Fork, Ana M González, R. Hale, R. Hawley, A. Roy, E. E. Bilger, N. Bond, M. J. Burns, K. Hopkins, K. Macneale, E. Martí, S. McKay, M. Neale, M. Paul, B. Ríos-Touma, Kathryn L. Russell, Robert F. Smith, S. Wagner, S. Wenger\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urban streams can provide amenities to people living in cities, but those benefits are reduced when streams become degraded, potentially even causing harm (disease, toxic compounds, etc.). Governments and institutions invest resources to improve the values and services provided by urban streams; however, the conception, development, and implementation of such projects may not include meaningful involvement of community members and other stakeholders. Consequently, project objectives may be misaligned with community desires and needs, and projects may fail to achieve their goals. In February 2020, the 5th Symposium on Urbanization and Stream Ecology, an interdisciplinary meeting held every 3 to 5 y, met in Austin, Texas, USA, to explore new approaches to urban stream projects, including ways to maximize the full range of potential benefits by better integrating community members into project identification and decision making. The symposium included in-depth discussion about 4 nearby field case studies, participation of multidisciplinary urban stream experts from 5 continents, and input from the Austin community. Institutional barriers to community inclusion were identified and analyzed using real-world examples, both from the case studies and from the literature, which clarified disparities in power, equity, and values. Outcomes of the symposium have been aggregated into a vision that challenges the present institutional approach to urban stream management and a set of strategies to systematically address these barriers to improve restoration solutions. Integrating community members and other stakeholders throughout the urban restoration process, and a transparent decision-making process to resolve divergent objectives, can help identify appropriate goals for realizing both the ecological and social benefits of stream restoration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Freshwater Science\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"404 - 419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Freshwater Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Freshwater Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

城市河流可以为居住在城市中的人们提供便利,但当河流退化时,这些好处就会减少,甚至可能造成危害(疾病、有毒化合物等)。政府和机构投入资源,改善城市河流提供的价值和服务;然而,这些项目的构思、开发和实施可能不包括社区成员和其他利益相关者的有意义的参与。因此,项目目标可能与社区的愿望和需求不一致,项目可能无法实现其目标。2020年2月,第五届城市化与河流生态研讨会(每3至5年举行一次的跨学科会议)在美国德克萨斯州奥斯汀举行,旨在探索城市河流项目的新方法,包括通过更好地将社区成员纳入项目识别和决策中来最大化潜在效益的方法。研讨会包括对4个附近实地案例研究的深入讨论,来自五大洲的多学科城市流专家的参与,以及奥斯汀社区的投入。通过案例研究和文献资料,确定并分析了社区包容的制度障碍,这些障碍阐明了权力、公平和价值观方面的差异。研讨会的成果汇集成一个愿景,挑战了目前城市河流管理的体制方法,并提出了一套系统地解决这些障碍以改进修复解决方案的战略。在整个城市恢复过程中整合社区成员和其他利益相关者,并通过透明的决策过程来解决不同的目标,可以帮助确定适当的目标,以实现河流恢复的生态和社会效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems
Urban streams can provide amenities to people living in cities, but those benefits are reduced when streams become degraded, potentially even causing harm (disease, toxic compounds, etc.). Governments and institutions invest resources to improve the values and services provided by urban streams; however, the conception, development, and implementation of such projects may not include meaningful involvement of community members and other stakeholders. Consequently, project objectives may be misaligned with community desires and needs, and projects may fail to achieve their goals. In February 2020, the 5th Symposium on Urbanization and Stream Ecology, an interdisciplinary meeting held every 3 to 5 y, met in Austin, Texas, USA, to explore new approaches to urban stream projects, including ways to maximize the full range of potential benefits by better integrating community members into project identification and decision making. The symposium included in-depth discussion about 4 nearby field case studies, participation of multidisciplinary urban stream experts from 5 continents, and input from the Austin community. Institutional barriers to community inclusion were identified and analyzed using real-world examples, both from the case studies and from the literature, which clarified disparities in power, equity, and values. Outcomes of the symposium have been aggregated into a vision that challenges the present institutional approach to urban stream management and a set of strategies to systematically address these barriers to improve restoration solutions. Integrating community members and other stakeholders throughout the urban restoration process, and a transparent decision-making process to resolve divergent objectives, can help identify appropriate goals for realizing both the ecological and social benefits of stream restoration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Freshwater Science
Freshwater Science ECOLOGY-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Freshwater Science (FWS) publishes articles that advance understanding and environmental stewardship of all types of inland aquatic ecosystems (lakes, rivers, streams, reservoirs, subterranean, and estuaries) and ecosystems at the interface between aquatic and terrestrial habitats (wetlands, riparian areas, and floodplains). The journal regularly features papers on a wide range of topics, including physical, chemical, and biological properties of lentic and lotic habitats; ecosystem processes; structure and dynamics of populations, communities, and ecosystems; ecology, systematics, and genetics of freshwater organisms, from bacteria to vertebrates; linkages between freshwater and other ecosystems and between freshwater ecology and other aquatic sciences; bioassessment, conservation, and restoration; environmental management; and new or novel methods for basic or applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信