Kamilla Zampieri Rodrigues, Camila Ferreira Pires Mattos, Dariele Aparecida Ferreira, Luiza Foltran de Azevedo Koch, Ernesto Josué Schmitt, M. Gabardo
{"title":"巴西parana州基本保健单位使用者的满意度","authors":"Kamilla Zampieri Rodrigues, Camila Ferreira Pires Mattos, Dariele Aparecida Ferreira, Luiza Foltran de Azevedo Koch, Ernesto Josué Schmitt, M. Gabardo","doi":"10.15448/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.4.32253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS: To evaluate the users' degree of satisfaction with the structure and services provided in a Basic Health Unit of the Public Health System.METHODS: This cross-sectional study included individuals aged ≥18 years, of both genders, individually interviewed from March to May 2018 at the Ferraria Basic Health Unit, Campo Largo, Paraná, Brazil. A structured questionnaire contained sociodemographic information and questions adapted from the instrument used in the National Health Services Evaluation Program, regarding satisfaction with the staff, waiting time and local physical structure. Descriptive analysis of the data was followed by the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and Poisson regression tests. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.RESULTS: The sample consisted of 373 users who met the inclusion criteria, of whom 72.9% were female, 82.8% were white race/skin color, 69.0% had low income and 36.4% had low schooling.The health team was the best evaluated item (73.3% of answers in the categories \"very good\" and \"good\"); and the waiting time for service was the worst evaluated item (61.5% of answers \"bad\" or \"very poor\"). In the bivariate analysis, the health team care was not associated with any independent variables. In the general evaluation of the establishment, the categories \"very good/good\", \"regular\", \"bad\" and \"very bad\" were evaluated respectively by 84 (27.4%), 128 (41.7%), 67 (21.8%) and 28 (9.1%) white users; and 22 (34.9%), 34 (54.0%), 7 (11.1%) and 0 (0.0%) non-white users (p=0.006). In the Poisson regression model, low schooling was associated with a 1.5 times greater chance of not knowing where to complain in case of poor care.CONCLUSIONS: The degree of satisfaction of the users of the Ferraria Basic Health Unit was influenced by factors such as race/skin color, income and schooling. Non-white users expressed a higher degree of satisfaction than white users. Users with low schooling knew less where to complain if service was not satisfactory. Although the evaluation was generally positive, some items were identified as unsatisfactory, deserving corrective measures.","PeriodicalId":44024,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grau de satisfação entre os usuários de uma unidade básica de saúde no estado do Paraná, Brasil\",\"authors\":\"Kamilla Zampieri Rodrigues, Camila Ferreira Pires Mattos, Dariele Aparecida Ferreira, Luiza Foltran de Azevedo Koch, Ernesto Josué Schmitt, M. Gabardo\",\"doi\":\"10.15448/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.4.32253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS: To evaluate the users' degree of satisfaction with the structure and services provided in a Basic Health Unit of the Public Health System.METHODS: This cross-sectional study included individuals aged ≥18 years, of both genders, individually interviewed from March to May 2018 at the Ferraria Basic Health Unit, Campo Largo, Paraná, Brazil. A structured questionnaire contained sociodemographic information and questions adapted from the instrument used in the National Health Services Evaluation Program, regarding satisfaction with the staff, waiting time and local physical structure. Descriptive analysis of the data was followed by the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and Poisson regression tests. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.RESULTS: The sample consisted of 373 users who met the inclusion criteria, of whom 72.9% were female, 82.8% were white race/skin color, 69.0% had low income and 36.4% had low schooling.The health team was the best evaluated item (73.3% of answers in the categories \\\"very good\\\" and \\\"good\\\"); and the waiting time for service was the worst evaluated item (61.5% of answers \\\"bad\\\" or \\\"very poor\\\"). In the bivariate analysis, the health team care was not associated with any independent variables. In the general evaluation of the establishment, the categories \\\"very good/good\\\", \\\"regular\\\", \\\"bad\\\" and \\\"very bad\\\" were evaluated respectively by 84 (27.4%), 128 (41.7%), 67 (21.8%) and 28 (9.1%) white users; and 22 (34.9%), 34 (54.0%), 7 (11.1%) and 0 (0.0%) non-white users (p=0.006). In the Poisson regression model, low schooling was associated with a 1.5 times greater chance of not knowing where to complain in case of poor care.CONCLUSIONS: The degree of satisfaction of the users of the Ferraria Basic Health Unit was influenced by factors such as race/skin color, income and schooling. Non-white users expressed a higher degree of satisfaction than white users. Users with low schooling knew less where to complain if service was not satisfactory. Although the evaluation was generally positive, some items were identified as unsatisfactory, deserving corrective measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15448/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.4.32253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.4.32253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:评价用户对公共卫生系统基层卫生单位的结构和服务的满意度。方法:本横断面研究包括年龄≥18岁的男女个体,于2018年3月至5月在巴西帕拉纳 Campo Largo的Ferraria基本卫生单位进行单独访谈。一份结构化问卷包含社会人口统计信息和根据国家卫生服务评估方案使用的工具改编的问题,涉及对工作人员的满意度、等待时间和当地物理结构。对数据进行描述性分析后,采用Mann-Whitney U、Kruskal-Wallis、卡方和泊松回归检验。p<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:样本包括373名符合纳入标准的用户,其中72.9%为女性,82.8%为白人种族/肤色,69.0%为低收入,36.4%为低学历。医疗团队是评价最好的项目(在“非常好”和“好”类别中有73.3%的答案);等待服务的时间是评价最差的项目(61.5%的回答是“差”或“很差”)。在双变量分析中,医疗团队的护理与任何自变量无关。在对机构的总体评价中,白人用户分别对“非常好/好”、“一般”、“差”和“非常差”进行了84(27.4%)、128(41.7%)、67(21.8%)和28(9.1%)的评价;22(34.9%), 34(54.0%)、7(11.1%)和0(0.0%)非白人用户(p = 0.006)。在泊松回归模型中,低学校教育与1.5倍的不知道在照顾不好的情况下去哪里投诉的可能性相关。结论:法拉利亚基层卫生服务单位的用户满意度受种族/肤色、收入、学历等因素的影响。非白人用户比白人用户表达了更高的满意度。如果服务不令人满意,受教育程度较低的用户不知道去哪里投诉。虽然评价总体上是积极的,但有些项目被认为不令人满意,需要采取纠正措施。
Grau de satisfação entre os usuários de uma unidade básica de saúde no estado do Paraná, Brasil
AIMS: To evaluate the users' degree of satisfaction with the structure and services provided in a Basic Health Unit of the Public Health System.METHODS: This cross-sectional study included individuals aged ≥18 years, of both genders, individually interviewed from March to May 2018 at the Ferraria Basic Health Unit, Campo Largo, Paraná, Brazil. A structured questionnaire contained sociodemographic information and questions adapted from the instrument used in the National Health Services Evaluation Program, regarding satisfaction with the staff, waiting time and local physical structure. Descriptive analysis of the data was followed by the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and Poisson regression tests. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.RESULTS: The sample consisted of 373 users who met the inclusion criteria, of whom 72.9% were female, 82.8% were white race/skin color, 69.0% had low income and 36.4% had low schooling.The health team was the best evaluated item (73.3% of answers in the categories "very good" and "good"); and the waiting time for service was the worst evaluated item (61.5% of answers "bad" or "very poor"). In the bivariate analysis, the health team care was not associated with any independent variables. In the general evaluation of the establishment, the categories "very good/good", "regular", "bad" and "very bad" were evaluated respectively by 84 (27.4%), 128 (41.7%), 67 (21.8%) and 28 (9.1%) white users; and 22 (34.9%), 34 (54.0%), 7 (11.1%) and 0 (0.0%) non-white users (p=0.006). In the Poisson regression model, low schooling was associated with a 1.5 times greater chance of not knowing where to complain in case of poor care.CONCLUSIONS: The degree of satisfaction of the users of the Ferraria Basic Health Unit was influenced by factors such as race/skin color, income and schooling. Non-white users expressed a higher degree of satisfaction than white users. Users with low schooling knew less where to complain if service was not satisfactory. Although the evaluation was generally positive, some items were identified as unsatisfactory, deserving corrective measures.