中国民法典对虚拟名誉保护的影响

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
J. Ge, Li Chen
{"title":"中国民法典对虚拟名誉保护的影响","authors":"J. Ge, Li Chen","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2022.2033088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prior to the promulgation of the Chinese Civil Code, when a person’s online persona or virtual character is defamed, the law of defamation in China only provides damages or compensation to the human controller if and only if the controller’s ‘social estimation’ suffered harm in the real world. Absent such harm, no remedy based on personality rights law or tort law is available. This was the position taken by the Supreme People’s Court in the gazetted case of Jing Zhang v. Lingfeng Yu. This position has since been embraced by Chinese legal scholars and subsequent judicial practice. This article takes a position contrary to this mainstream view: the controller’s right to reputation should be protected even if there is no diminution of his/her real life ‘social estimation’, such that only the online persona is insulted or defamed. This article analyses the rationale for the protection of online personas as a standalone right and argues that such protection can be achieved under the current Chinese legal framework and principles through the sound interpretation and application of Article 1024(2) of the recently promulgated Chinese Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":42799,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Law Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"366 - 383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chinese Civil Code’s impact on the protection of Virtual Reputation in China\",\"authors\":\"J. Ge, Li Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10192557.2022.2033088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Prior to the promulgation of the Chinese Civil Code, when a person’s online persona or virtual character is defamed, the law of defamation in China only provides damages or compensation to the human controller if and only if the controller’s ‘social estimation’ suffered harm in the real world. Absent such harm, no remedy based on personality rights law or tort law is available. This was the position taken by the Supreme People’s Court in the gazetted case of Jing Zhang v. Lingfeng Yu. This position has since been embraced by Chinese legal scholars and subsequent judicial practice. This article takes a position contrary to this mainstream view: the controller’s right to reputation should be protected even if there is no diminution of his/her real life ‘social estimation’, such that only the online persona is insulted or defamed. This article analyses the rationale for the protection of online personas as a standalone right and argues that such protection can be achieved under the current Chinese legal framework and principles through the sound interpretation and application of Article 1024(2) of the recently promulgated Chinese Civil Code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"366 - 383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2033088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2033088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在《中国民法典》颁布之前,当一个人的网络角色或虚拟人物受到诽谤时,中国的诽谤法只在控制者的“社会估计”在现实世界中受到伤害的情况下,才对其提供损害赔偿。如果没有这种伤害,就没有基于人格权法或侵权法的补救办法。这是最高人民法院在刊登宪报的张诉俞玲峰一案中所采取的立场。这一立场一直受到中国法律学者和随后的司法实践的欢迎。这篇文章的立场与这一主流观点相反:即使控制者在现实生活中的“社会评价”没有减少,只有网络人物受到侮辱或诽谤,他的名誉权也应该得到保护。本文分析了网络人格作为一项独立权利受到保护的理由,并认为在中国现行法律框架和原则下,通过对最近颁布的《中国民法典》第1024(2)条的合理解释和适用,可以实现这种保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Chinese Civil Code’s impact on the protection of Virtual Reputation in China
ABSTRACT Prior to the promulgation of the Chinese Civil Code, when a person’s online persona or virtual character is defamed, the law of defamation in China only provides damages or compensation to the human controller if and only if the controller’s ‘social estimation’ suffered harm in the real world. Absent such harm, no remedy based on personality rights law or tort law is available. This was the position taken by the Supreme People’s Court in the gazetted case of Jing Zhang v. Lingfeng Yu. This position has since been embraced by Chinese legal scholars and subsequent judicial practice. This article takes a position contrary to this mainstream view: the controller’s right to reputation should be protected even if there is no diminution of his/her real life ‘social estimation’, such that only the online persona is insulted or defamed. This article analyses the rationale for the protection of online personas as a standalone right and argues that such protection can be achieved under the current Chinese legal framework and principles through the sound interpretation and application of Article 1024(2) of the recently promulgated Chinese Civil Code.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信