柔性支气管镜检查期间非麻醉医师患者控制镇静:关于安全性、可行性和成本的一年经验

Grossmann B, Nilsson A
{"title":"柔性支气管镜检查期间非麻醉医师患者控制镇静:关于安全性、可行性和成本的一年经验","authors":"Grossmann B, Nilsson A","doi":"10.26420/austinjanesthesiaandanalgesia.2022.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is an efficient and costsaving method for sedation during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in the presence of anaesthetic staff, but no data is available for PCS in a non-anaesthesiologist environment. Methods: This descriptive study describes PCS with propofol in a non-anaesthesiologist setup during outpatient FB procedures, including transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, cryotherapy/biopsy and/or multistation endobronchial ultrasound, and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope. Results: 287 procedures were completed. The median (range) duration for the procedures was 45 (10-105) minutes. The median (range) total propofol dose administered was 201 (55-570) mg, and 61 procedures (21%) required bolus doses of alfentanil. Desaturation occurred during 21% of the procedures and was resolved spontaneously (59%) or by using a jaw thrust (41%). No evidence was found that alfentanil contributed to desaturation (p=0.081). Inconsistent results were shown regarding the impact of alfentanil on the reduction of cough. The post-procedural assessment revealed high score of satisfaction and feasibility. 3 (1%) procedures were cancelled due to insufficient sedation. No prolonged recovery with need of overnight stay was reported. The direct costs for sedation were 180 USD/procedure. Conclusion: PCS with propofol and the presence of trained nonanaesthesiologists during outpatient FB has shown to result in high procedure feasibility and satisfaction without compromising patient safety or increasing the risk for unhandled respiratory adverse events. The method reduces costs for sedation and offers the possibility to increase patient turn over due to no prolonged recovery.","PeriodicalId":92989,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Controlled Sedation by Non-Anaesthesiologists during Flexible Bronchoscopy: A One-Year Experience Regarding Safety, Feasibility and Costs\",\"authors\":\"Grossmann B, Nilsson A\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjanesthesiaandanalgesia.2022.1104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is an efficient and costsaving method for sedation during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in the presence of anaesthetic staff, but no data is available for PCS in a non-anaesthesiologist environment. Methods: This descriptive study describes PCS with propofol in a non-anaesthesiologist setup during outpatient FB procedures, including transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, cryotherapy/biopsy and/or multistation endobronchial ultrasound, and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope. Results: 287 procedures were completed. The median (range) duration for the procedures was 45 (10-105) minutes. The median (range) total propofol dose administered was 201 (55-570) mg, and 61 procedures (21%) required bolus doses of alfentanil. Desaturation occurred during 21% of the procedures and was resolved spontaneously (59%) or by using a jaw thrust (41%). No evidence was found that alfentanil contributed to desaturation (p=0.081). Inconsistent results were shown regarding the impact of alfentanil on the reduction of cough. The post-procedural assessment revealed high score of satisfaction and feasibility. 3 (1%) procedures were cancelled due to insufficient sedation. No prolonged recovery with need of overnight stay was reported. The direct costs for sedation were 180 USD/procedure. Conclusion: PCS with propofol and the presence of trained nonanaesthesiologists during outpatient FB has shown to result in high procedure feasibility and satisfaction without compromising patient safety or increasing the risk for unhandled respiratory adverse events. The method reduces costs for sedation and offers the possibility to increase patient turn over due to no prolonged recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanesthesiaandanalgesia.2022.1104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanesthesiaandanalgesia.2022.1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在麻醉人员在场的情况下,患者控制镇静(PCS)是柔性支气管镜检查(FB)期间一种有效且节省成本的镇静方法,但在非麻醉人员环境下的PCS没有数据可用。方法:本描述性研究描述了门诊FB过程中在非麻醉医师设置下使用异丙酚的PCS,包括经支气管活检,经支气管穿刺,冷冻治疗/活检和/或多站支气管超声,以及支气管镜下的内窥镜超声。结果:共完成287例手术。手术的中位(范围)持续时间为45(10-105)分钟。施用的异丙酚总剂量中位数(范围)为201 (55-570)mg, 61例(21%)手术需要阿芬太尼大剂量。去饱和发生在21%的手术中,自发解决(59%)或通过下颌推力解决(41%)。没有证据表明阿芬太尼有助于去饱和(p=0.081)。关于阿芬太尼对减少咳嗽的影响,结果不一致。术后评价满意度和可行性评分较高。3例(1%)手术因镇静不足而取消。没有报告需要过夜的长时间恢复。镇静的直接费用为180美元/次。结论:在门诊FB手术中,在训练有素的非麻醉师的在场下,使用异丙酚的PCS具有很高的手术可行性和满意度,而不会损害患者的安全或增加未处理的呼吸不良事件的风险。该方法降低了镇静的成本,并提供了增加病人翻身的可能性,因为没有长时间的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-Controlled Sedation by Non-Anaesthesiologists during Flexible Bronchoscopy: A One-Year Experience Regarding Safety, Feasibility and Costs
Background: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is an efficient and costsaving method for sedation during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in the presence of anaesthetic staff, but no data is available for PCS in a non-anaesthesiologist environment. Methods: This descriptive study describes PCS with propofol in a non-anaesthesiologist setup during outpatient FB procedures, including transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, cryotherapy/biopsy and/or multistation endobronchial ultrasound, and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope. Results: 287 procedures were completed. The median (range) duration for the procedures was 45 (10-105) minutes. The median (range) total propofol dose administered was 201 (55-570) mg, and 61 procedures (21%) required bolus doses of alfentanil. Desaturation occurred during 21% of the procedures and was resolved spontaneously (59%) or by using a jaw thrust (41%). No evidence was found that alfentanil contributed to desaturation (p=0.081). Inconsistent results were shown regarding the impact of alfentanil on the reduction of cough. The post-procedural assessment revealed high score of satisfaction and feasibility. 3 (1%) procedures were cancelled due to insufficient sedation. No prolonged recovery with need of overnight stay was reported. The direct costs for sedation were 180 USD/procedure. Conclusion: PCS with propofol and the presence of trained nonanaesthesiologists during outpatient FB has shown to result in high procedure feasibility and satisfaction without compromising patient safety or increasing the risk for unhandled respiratory adverse events. The method reduces costs for sedation and offers the possibility to increase patient turn over due to no prolonged recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信