西班牙语儿童权利出版物的分析现状。关于三种书目趋势:否认主义者、官方和反官方

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Camilo Bácares Jara
{"title":"西班牙语儿童权利出版物的分析现状。关于三种书目趋势:否认主义者、官方和反官方","authors":"Camilo Bácares Jara","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202002.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to contribute to the state of the art of the rights of children and adolescents (NNA, in Spanish) in Latin America and Spain. For this purpose, 195 sources were analyzed, including articles, books and chapters of books written in Spanish, obtained through the databases and the search managers Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, Mendeley, Ebsco, Clase, Redalyc, Scielo, Dialnet, Latindex, Academic Record, Researchgate.net and Academia.edu. The inquiries allowed to establish that in the literature produced in Spanish about the rights of children there are three research developments. In the first one, the texts that indicate that children cannot have rights or, in their absence, have to assign their ownership to an adult because of their vulnerability, irrationality and disability. In the second, the writings that replicate the Convention on the Rights of the Child or that reduce the discussion about the rights of children to legal language and its articles. Finally, there are those documents that problematize the CRC and its great myths using ethnography and sociology.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":"1 1","pages":"473-515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Un estado del arte analítico de las publicaciones sobre los derechos del niño en español. A propósito de tres tendencias bibliográficas: la negacionista, la oficial y la contraoficial\",\"authors\":\"Camilo Bácares Jara\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/derechopucp.202002.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to contribute to the state of the art of the rights of children and adolescents (NNA, in Spanish) in Latin America and Spain. For this purpose, 195 sources were analyzed, including articles, books and chapters of books written in Spanish, obtained through the databases and the search managers Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, Mendeley, Ebsco, Clase, Redalyc, Scielo, Dialnet, Latindex, Academic Record, Researchgate.net and Academia.edu. The inquiries allowed to establish that in the literature produced in Spanish about the rights of children there are three research developments. In the first one, the texts that indicate that children cannot have rights or, in their absence, have to assign their ownership to an adult because of their vulnerability, irrationality and disability. In the second, the writings that replicate the Convention on the Rights of the Child or that reduce the discussion about the rights of children to legal language and its articles. Finally, there are those documents that problematize the CRC and its great myths using ethnography and sociology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derecho PUCP\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"473-515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derecho PUCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202002.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho PUCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202002.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在为拉丁美洲和西班牙儿童和青少年权利(NNA,西班牙语)的最新状况作出贡献。为此,通过数据库和搜索管理器Scopus、Web of Science、Proquest、Mendeley、Ebsco、Clase、Redalyc、Scielo、Dialnet、Latindex、Academic Record、Researchgate.net和Academia.edu,分析了195个来源,包括用西班牙语写的文章、书籍和书籍章节。通过调查可以确定,在以西班牙语编写的关于儿童权利的文献中,有三个研究进展。在第一种情况下,文本表明儿童不能享有权利,或者在儿童缺席的情况下,由于儿童的脆弱性、不理性和残疾,必须将其所有权转让给成年人。第二种是复制《儿童权利公约》或将关于儿童权利的讨论简化为法律语言及其条款的著作。最后,还有一些文献用民族志和社会学的方法对CRC及其伟大神话提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Un estado del arte analítico de las publicaciones sobre los derechos del niño en español. A propósito de tres tendencias bibliográficas: la negacionista, la oficial y la contraoficial
This article aims to contribute to the state of the art of the rights of children and adolescents (NNA, in Spanish) in Latin America and Spain. For this purpose, 195 sources were analyzed, including articles, books and chapters of books written in Spanish, obtained through the databases and the search managers Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, Mendeley, Ebsco, Clase, Redalyc, Scielo, Dialnet, Latindex, Academic Record, Researchgate.net and Academia.edu. The inquiries allowed to establish that in the literature produced in Spanish about the rights of children there are three research developments. In the first one, the texts that indicate that children cannot have rights or, in their absence, have to assign their ownership to an adult because of their vulnerability, irrationality and disability. In the second, the writings that replicate the Convention on the Rights of the Child or that reduce the discussion about the rights of children to legal language and its articles. Finally, there are those documents that problematize the CRC and its great myths using ethnography and sociology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信