肝外病变的经皮肝穿刺活检

Y. Onishi, Y. Arai, M. Sone, S. Sugawara, Chihiro Itou, Shintaro Kimura
{"title":"肝外病变的经皮肝穿刺活检","authors":"Y. Onishi, Y. Arai, M. Sone, S. Sugawara, Chihiro Itou, Shintaro Kimura","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose The purpose was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of percutaneous transhepatic biopsy for extrahepatic lesions. Materials and Methods Between January 2008 and December 2019, 26 patients (17 men and 9 women; median age, 60 years) underwent percutaneous transhepatic needle biopsy for extrahepatic lesions at our institution. Transhepatic biopsy was deemed appropriate compared with other biopsy routes or methods (i.e., endoscopic or surgical). The lesions were in the porta hepatis (n = 9), retroperitoneum (n = 6), right adrenal gland (n = 4), right kidney (n = 3), lesser omentum (n = 2), duodenum (n = 1), pleura (n = 1), and inferior vena cava (n = 1). The median maximal diameter of the lesions was 45.5 mm (range, 18–148 mm). Core-needle biopsy was performed in all patients. Eighteen-gauge and 21-G needles were used in 25 and one patient, respectively. Ultrasound was used for biopsy in 21 patients, and CT fluoroscopy was used in five patients. Postbiopsy tract embolization was performed in three patients. Technical success and diagnostic accuracy of the biopsy were evaluated. Complications were recorded using the systemic inflammation response (SIR) criteria. Results The pathological results of biopsy were carcinoma (n = 10), lymphoma (n = 9), and other diagnoses (n = 7). Technical success was obtained in all patients. The accurate diagnosis was achieved in 24 of the 26 patients (92.3%). A major complication, a bladder tamponade, was observed in one patient (3.8%) after biopsy of a right kidney lesion. A hematoma caused by iatrogenic renal injury likely obstructed the bladder outlet. Minor complications were observed in three patients (11.5%). Conclusions Percutaneous transhepatic biopsy for extrahepatic lesions is feasible with acceptable safety.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":"5 1","pages":"041 - 044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1731127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous Transhepatic Biopsy for Extrahepatic Lesions\",\"authors\":\"Y. Onishi, Y. Arai, M. Sone, S. Sugawara, Chihiro Itou, Shintaro Kimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1731127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Purpose The purpose was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of percutaneous transhepatic biopsy for extrahepatic lesions. Materials and Methods Between January 2008 and December 2019, 26 patients (17 men and 9 women; median age, 60 years) underwent percutaneous transhepatic needle biopsy for extrahepatic lesions at our institution. Transhepatic biopsy was deemed appropriate compared with other biopsy routes or methods (i.e., endoscopic or surgical). The lesions were in the porta hepatis (n = 9), retroperitoneum (n = 6), right adrenal gland (n = 4), right kidney (n = 3), lesser omentum (n = 2), duodenum (n = 1), pleura (n = 1), and inferior vena cava (n = 1). The median maximal diameter of the lesions was 45.5 mm (range, 18–148 mm). Core-needle biopsy was performed in all patients. Eighteen-gauge and 21-G needles were used in 25 and one patient, respectively. Ultrasound was used for biopsy in 21 patients, and CT fluoroscopy was used in five patients. Postbiopsy tract embolization was performed in three patients. Technical success and diagnostic accuracy of the biopsy were evaluated. Complications were recorded using the systemic inflammation response (SIR) criteria. Results The pathological results of biopsy were carcinoma (n = 10), lymphoma (n = 9), and other diagnoses (n = 7). Technical success was obtained in all patients. The accurate diagnosis was achieved in 24 of the 26 patients (92.3%). A major complication, a bladder tamponade, was observed in one patient (3.8%) after biopsy of a right kidney lesion. A hematoma caused by iatrogenic renal injury likely obstructed the bladder outlet. Minor complications were observed in three patients (11.5%). Conclusions Percutaneous transhepatic biopsy for extrahepatic lesions is feasible with acceptable safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"041 - 044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1731127\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价经皮肝穿刺活检诊断肝外病变的准确性和安全性。材料与方法2008年1月至2019年12月,26例患者(男17例,女9例;中位年龄60岁)在我院接受肝外病变经皮穿刺活检。与其他活检途径或方法(即内窥镜或手术)相比,经肝活检被认为是合适的。病灶位于肝门(9例)、腹膜后(6例)、右肾上腺(4例)、右肾(3例)、小网膜(2例)、十二指肠(1例)、胸膜(1例)、下腔静脉(1例)。病灶中位最大直径45.5 mm(范围18 ~ 148 mm)。所有患者均行芯针活检。18号针头和21号针头分别用于25例和1例患者。21例行超声活检,5例行CT透视。3例患者行活检后尿道栓塞术。评估活检的技术成功率和诊断准确性。采用全身炎症反应(SIR)标准记录并发症。结果活检病理结果为癌(n = 10)、淋巴瘤(n = 9)和其他诊断(n = 7),所有患者均获得技术成功。26例患者中24例(92.3%)诊断准确。1例患者(3.8%)在右肾病变活检后出现膀胱填塞。医源性肾损伤引起的血肿可能阻塞了膀胱出口。轻微并发症3例(11.5%)。结论经皮肝穿刺活检治疗肝外病变是可行的,安全性可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous Transhepatic Biopsy for Extrahepatic Lesions
Abstract Purpose The purpose was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of percutaneous transhepatic biopsy for extrahepatic lesions. Materials and Methods Between January 2008 and December 2019, 26 patients (17 men and 9 women; median age, 60 years) underwent percutaneous transhepatic needle biopsy for extrahepatic lesions at our institution. Transhepatic biopsy was deemed appropriate compared with other biopsy routes or methods (i.e., endoscopic or surgical). The lesions were in the porta hepatis (n = 9), retroperitoneum (n = 6), right adrenal gland (n = 4), right kidney (n = 3), lesser omentum (n = 2), duodenum (n = 1), pleura (n = 1), and inferior vena cava (n = 1). The median maximal diameter of the lesions was 45.5 mm (range, 18–148 mm). Core-needle biopsy was performed in all patients. Eighteen-gauge and 21-G needles were used in 25 and one patient, respectively. Ultrasound was used for biopsy in 21 patients, and CT fluoroscopy was used in five patients. Postbiopsy tract embolization was performed in three patients. Technical success and diagnostic accuracy of the biopsy were evaluated. Complications were recorded using the systemic inflammation response (SIR) criteria. Results The pathological results of biopsy were carcinoma (n = 10), lymphoma (n = 9), and other diagnoses (n = 7). Technical success was obtained in all patients. The accurate diagnosis was achieved in 24 of the 26 patients (92.3%). A major complication, a bladder tamponade, was observed in one patient (3.8%) after biopsy of a right kidney lesion. A hematoma caused by iatrogenic renal injury likely obstructed the bladder outlet. Minor complications were observed in three patients (11.5%). Conclusions Percutaneous transhepatic biopsy for extrahepatic lesions is feasible with acceptable safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信