当地对森林规则的看法以及规则、生态旅游和人类与野生动物冲突之间的互动:来自尼泊尔奇特万国家公园的证据

IF 1 Q4 ECOLOGY
Tropics Pub Date : 2020-04-15 DOI:10.3759/tropics.ms19-07
Saroj Kandel, K. Harada, Sudha Adhikari, N. Dahal, M. Dhakal
{"title":"当地对森林规则的看法以及规则、生态旅游和人类与野生动物冲突之间的互动:来自尼泊尔奇特万国家公园的证据","authors":"Saroj Kandel, K. Harada, Sudha Adhikari, N. Dahal, M. Dhakal","doi":"10.3759/tropics.ms19-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is always a conflict of interest between conservation efforts and communities living near conservation areas. Buffer zones and opportunities for ecotourism are sometimes created to lessen the negative impact of the stringent rules involved in conservation which directly impacts the livelihoods of neighbouring communities. This paper examines a Nepalese community’s perceptions of the Buffer Zone Community Forest (BZCF) rules, and investigates the interplay of rules, ecotourism, and human-wildlife conflict (HWC). Data were obtained from face-to-face household surveys and key informant interviews carried out in two Buffer Zone Villages in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. It was found that access to forest resources has become more restricted since ecotourism was introduced in the BZCF. Furthermore, contrary to expectations, settlements both closer to and farther from the forest are largely affected to the same extent by these restrictions. This study recommends better livelihood opportunities for disadvantaged groups in and around the BZCF, along with the development of forest policies based in reality to improve compliance with forest rules and to gain local support for conservation efforts.","PeriodicalId":51890,"journal":{"name":"Tropics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3759/tropics.ms19-07","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local perceptions of forest rules and interactions between rules, ecotourism, and human-wildlife conflicts: Evidence from Chitwan National Park, Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Saroj Kandel, K. Harada, Sudha Adhikari, N. Dahal, M. Dhakal\",\"doi\":\"10.3759/tropics.ms19-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is always a conflict of interest between conservation efforts and communities living near conservation areas. Buffer zones and opportunities for ecotourism are sometimes created to lessen the negative impact of the stringent rules involved in conservation which directly impacts the livelihoods of neighbouring communities. This paper examines a Nepalese community’s perceptions of the Buffer Zone Community Forest (BZCF) rules, and investigates the interplay of rules, ecotourism, and human-wildlife conflict (HWC). Data were obtained from face-to-face household surveys and key informant interviews carried out in two Buffer Zone Villages in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. It was found that access to forest resources has become more restricted since ecotourism was introduced in the BZCF. Furthermore, contrary to expectations, settlements both closer to and farther from the forest are largely affected to the same extent by these restrictions. This study recommends better livelihood opportunities for disadvantaged groups in and around the BZCF, along with the development of forest policies based in reality to improve compliance with forest rules and to gain local support for conservation efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3759/tropics.ms19-07\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.ms19-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.ms19-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

保护工作和居住在保护区附近的社区之间总是存在利益冲突。有时会创建缓冲区和生态旅游机会,以减轻严格的保护规则的负面影响,这些规则直接影响到邻近社区的生计。本文考察了尼泊尔社区对缓冲区社区森林(BZCF)规则的看法,并调查了规则、生态旅游和人类与野生动物冲突(HWC)的相互作用。数据来自于在尼泊尔奇特万国家公园的两个缓冲区村庄进行的面对面家庭调查和关键线人访谈。研究发现,自从BZCF引入生态旅游以来,获得森林资源变得更加受限。此外,与预期相反,靠近和远离森林的定居点在很大程度上也受到这些限制的影响。这项研究建议为BZCF及其周围的弱势群体提供更好的谋生机会,同时制定基于现实的森林政策,以提高对森林规则的遵守程度,并获得当地对保护工作的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local perceptions of forest rules and interactions between rules, ecotourism, and human-wildlife conflicts: Evidence from Chitwan National Park, Nepal
There is always a conflict of interest between conservation efforts and communities living near conservation areas. Buffer zones and opportunities for ecotourism are sometimes created to lessen the negative impact of the stringent rules involved in conservation which directly impacts the livelihoods of neighbouring communities. This paper examines a Nepalese community’s perceptions of the Buffer Zone Community Forest (BZCF) rules, and investigates the interplay of rules, ecotourism, and human-wildlife conflict (HWC). Data were obtained from face-to-face household surveys and key informant interviews carried out in two Buffer Zone Villages in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. It was found that access to forest resources has become more restricted since ecotourism was introduced in the BZCF. Furthermore, contrary to expectations, settlements both closer to and farther from the forest are largely affected to the same extent by these restrictions. This study recommends better livelihood opportunities for disadvantaged groups in and around the BZCF, along with the development of forest policies based in reality to improve compliance with forest rules and to gain local support for conservation efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropics
Tropics ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信