腓长肌腱和半腱肌腱游离的前交叉韧带近端损伤单束鞘内解剖重建

Q4 Medicine
Cailong Liu, Lichuang Wu, Yi-lin Ye
{"title":"腓长肌腱和半腱肌腱游离的前交叉韧带近端损伤单束鞘内解剖重建","authors":"Cailong Liu, Lichuang Wu, Yi-lin Ye","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the feasibility and clinical effect of single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using dissociate peroneus longus tendon combined with semitendinosus tendon. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom January 2015 to September 2016, a total of 24 patients with proximal injury of ACL, confirmed by arthroscopy, were admitted to the sports medicine department of our hospital. The ACL was completely ruptured from the proximal footprint and the tibial side residual remained intact. There were 19 males and 5 females; 16 cases on the right side and 8 cases on the left side. The mean age was 27.88±7.13 years old; The interval between injury and surgery was 14.83±9.09 d; The dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendonfrom the injured extremity were folded in half, then braided and trimmed into ACL graft for use. The ACL remnant was preserved and the graft was pulled through the stump for single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction. The ACL graft was fixed with Endobutton on the femoral side and interference screw on the tibial side. The results of Lachman test, Lysholm scores, Tegner scores and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores of knee before operation and at final visit were recorded to evaluate the stability and function of the knee. Visual analogue score (VAS) was used to record the changes of pain at the site where the peroneal longus tendon was harvested. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scores were recorded before injury and at the final visit to assess the effect of ankle function after peroneal longus tendon resection. \n \n \nResults \nThe diameter of the ACL graft made of dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon is 8.88±0.30 mm. All patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic, with an average of 34.38±5.40 months, and no serious complications such as rerupture and joint infection were found. There were 16 grade B, 6 grade C and 2 grade D for preoperative Lachman test, none with hard end point. At last vist, there were 23 cases of grade A and 1 grade B, all with hard end points for Lachman test. At the preoperative and final visit, the Lysholm scores of the knee joint were 35.20±11.92 and 94.29±2.92 (t=23.850, P=0.000). Tegner scores were 3.46±0.93 and 8.04±1.00 (t=16.653, P=0.000). The subjective IKDC scores of knee joint were 47.63±13.06 and 91.71±3.75 (t=15.972, P=0.000). At the final visit, all the indicators of the knee were improved compared with those before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant.The AOFAS scores before injury and at the final visit were 98.83 (2.78) and 98.17 (4.01), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (t=1.850, P=0.076) . The VAS scores for the harvest of theperoneus longus tendon were 4.50±1.41, 0.54±0.65 and 0.29±0.55 immediately and 6 months after the operation and at the last visit.There was statistically significant difference between the scores immediately and 6 months after the operation (t=14.900, P=0.001).There was statistically significant differences between the scores at 6 months after the operation and the final visit (t=2.770, P=0.011). \n \n \nConclusion \nSingle bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of ACL using dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon is feasible with good clinical effect. \n \n \nKey words: \nAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anatomical; Arthroscopes","PeriodicalId":36405,"journal":{"name":"中华骨科杂志","volume":"40 1","pages":"73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of anterior cruciate ligament with dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon\",\"authors\":\"Cailong Liu, Lichuang Wu, Yi-lin Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the feasibility and clinical effect of single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using dissociate peroneus longus tendon combined with semitendinosus tendon. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom January 2015 to September 2016, a total of 24 patients with proximal injury of ACL, confirmed by arthroscopy, were admitted to the sports medicine department of our hospital. The ACL was completely ruptured from the proximal footprint and the tibial side residual remained intact. There were 19 males and 5 females; 16 cases on the right side and 8 cases on the left side. The mean age was 27.88±7.13 years old; The interval between injury and surgery was 14.83±9.09 d; The dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendonfrom the injured extremity were folded in half, then braided and trimmed into ACL graft for use. The ACL remnant was preserved and the graft was pulled through the stump for single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction. The ACL graft was fixed with Endobutton on the femoral side and interference screw on the tibial side. The results of Lachman test, Lysholm scores, Tegner scores and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores of knee before operation and at final visit were recorded to evaluate the stability and function of the knee. Visual analogue score (VAS) was used to record the changes of pain at the site where the peroneal longus tendon was harvested. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scores were recorded before injury and at the final visit to assess the effect of ankle function after peroneal longus tendon resection. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe diameter of the ACL graft made of dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon is 8.88±0.30 mm. All patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic, with an average of 34.38±5.40 months, and no serious complications such as rerupture and joint infection were found. There were 16 grade B, 6 grade C and 2 grade D for preoperative Lachman test, none with hard end point. At last vist, there were 23 cases of grade A and 1 grade B, all with hard end points for Lachman test. At the preoperative and final visit, the Lysholm scores of the knee joint were 35.20±11.92 and 94.29±2.92 (t=23.850, P=0.000). Tegner scores were 3.46±0.93 and 8.04±1.00 (t=16.653, P=0.000). The subjective IKDC scores of knee joint were 47.63±13.06 and 91.71±3.75 (t=15.972, P=0.000). At the final visit, all the indicators of the knee were improved compared with those before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant.The AOFAS scores before injury and at the final visit were 98.83 (2.78) and 98.17 (4.01), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (t=1.850, P=0.076) . The VAS scores for the harvest of theperoneus longus tendon were 4.50±1.41, 0.54±0.65 and 0.29±0.55 immediately and 6 months after the operation and at the last visit.There was statistically significant difference between the scores immediately and 6 months after the operation (t=14.900, P=0.001).There was statistically significant differences between the scores at 6 months after the operation and the final visit (t=2.770, P=0.011). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nSingle bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of ACL using dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon is feasible with good clinical effect. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anatomical; Arthroscopes\",\"PeriodicalId\":36405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"73-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.02.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨游离腓骨长肌腱联合半腱肌肌腱单束解剖鞘内重建前交叉韧带近端损伤的可行性及临床效果。方法2015年1月至2016年9月,我院运动医学部收治经关节镜检查确诊的前交叉韧带近端损伤患者24例。前交叉韧带从近端足部完全断裂,胫骨侧残余完好无损。男性19只,女性5只;右侧16例,左侧8例。平均年龄27.88±7.13岁;损伤至手术时间为14.83±9.09 d;将受伤肢体游离的腓骨长肌腱和半腱肌腱对折,编织并修剪成ACL移植物使用。保留前交叉韧带残肢,将移植物穿过残肢进行单束解剖鞘内重建。前交叉韧带移植物用Endobutton在股侧固定,干涉螺钉在胫侧固定。记录术前及终诊时膝关节的Lachman试验、Lysholm评分、Tegner评分及国际膝关节文献委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee, IKDC)主观评分,评价膝关节的稳定性和功能。采用视觉模拟评分法(Visual analogue score, VAS)记录腓骨长肌腱切除部位的疼痛变化。美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分在损伤前和最后一次访问时记录,以评估腓长肌腱切除术后踝关节功能的影响。结果游离腓骨长肌腱和半腱肌腱制成的前交叉韧带移植物直径为8.88±0.30 mm。所有患者均在门诊随访,平均34.38±5.40个月,无复发、关节感染等严重并发症。术前Lachman试验B级16例,C级6例,D级2例,无硬终点。最后访视A级23例,B级1例,均为Lachman测试硬终点。术前和终诊时膝关节Lysholm评分分别为35.20±11.92和94.29±2.92 (t=23.850, P=0.000)。Tegner评分分别为3.46±0.93和8.04±1.00 (t=16.653, P=0.000)。膝关节主观IKDC评分分别为47.63±13.06分和91.71±3.75分(t=15.972, P=0.000)。终诊时膝关节各项指标均较术前改善,差异有统计学意义。伤前和末访时AOFAS评分分别为98.83(2.78)分和98.17(4.01)分,差异无统计学意义(t=1.850, P=0.076)。术后即刻、术后6个月及末次访视腓骨长肌腱的VAS评分分别为4.50±1.41、0.54±0.65、0.29±0.55。术后6个月与即刻评分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=14.900, P=0.001)。术后6个月评分与末次访视比较,差异有统计学意义(t=2.770, P=0.011)。结论游离腓骨长肌腱和半腱肌腱单束解剖鞘内重建前交叉韧带近端损伤是可行的,临床效果良好。关键词:前交叉韧带重建;解剖;关节内窥镜
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of anterior cruciate ligament with dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon
Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical effect of single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using dissociate peroneus longus tendon combined with semitendinosus tendon. Methods From January 2015 to September 2016, a total of 24 patients with proximal injury of ACL, confirmed by arthroscopy, were admitted to the sports medicine department of our hospital. The ACL was completely ruptured from the proximal footprint and the tibial side residual remained intact. There were 19 males and 5 females; 16 cases on the right side and 8 cases on the left side. The mean age was 27.88±7.13 years old; The interval between injury and surgery was 14.83±9.09 d; The dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendonfrom the injured extremity were folded in half, then braided and trimmed into ACL graft for use. The ACL remnant was preserved and the graft was pulled through the stump for single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction. The ACL graft was fixed with Endobutton on the femoral side and interference screw on the tibial side. The results of Lachman test, Lysholm scores, Tegner scores and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores of knee before operation and at final visit were recorded to evaluate the stability and function of the knee. Visual analogue score (VAS) was used to record the changes of pain at the site where the peroneal longus tendon was harvested. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scores were recorded before injury and at the final visit to assess the effect of ankle function after peroneal longus tendon resection. Results The diameter of the ACL graft made of dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon is 8.88±0.30 mm. All patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic, with an average of 34.38±5.40 months, and no serious complications such as rerupture and joint infection were found. There were 16 grade B, 6 grade C and 2 grade D for preoperative Lachman test, none with hard end point. At last vist, there were 23 cases of grade A and 1 grade B, all with hard end points for Lachman test. At the preoperative and final visit, the Lysholm scores of the knee joint were 35.20±11.92 and 94.29±2.92 (t=23.850, P=0.000). Tegner scores were 3.46±0.93 and 8.04±1.00 (t=16.653, P=0.000). The subjective IKDC scores of knee joint were 47.63±13.06 and 91.71±3.75 (t=15.972, P=0.000). At the final visit, all the indicators of the knee were improved compared with those before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant.The AOFAS scores before injury and at the final visit were 98.83 (2.78) and 98.17 (4.01), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (t=1.850, P=0.076) . The VAS scores for the harvest of theperoneus longus tendon were 4.50±1.41, 0.54±0.65 and 0.29±0.55 immediately and 6 months after the operation and at the last visit.There was statistically significant difference between the scores immediately and 6 months after the operation (t=14.900, P=0.001).There was statistically significant differences between the scores at 6 months after the operation and the final visit (t=2.770, P=0.011). Conclusion Single bundle anatomic intrathecal reconstruction of proximal injury of ACL using dissociate peroneus longus tendon and semitendinosus tendon is feasible with good clinical effect. Key words: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anatomical; Arthroscopes
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华骨科杂志
中华骨科杂志 Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8153
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信