{"title":"黑人经济赋权所有权重要吗?1994-2014年南非印刷媒体内容中“黑人能见度”的非殖民化分析","authors":"Prinola Govenden","doi":"10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ownership is identified as one of the major factors that influence the production of news. South Africa’s print media transformation situation presents an important Global South case study for journalism debates about ownership effects on news. The country’s media transformation agenda is based on the premise that transformation of ownership will automatically lead to a transformation of content on these levels. This study empirically examines whether the racial changes in print media ownership facilitated by black economic empowerment in the first 20 years of South Africa’s democracy (1994–2014) led to transformation of content with a focus on racial stereotypes of blackness. It conducts a decolonial analysis of the representation of blackness in three issues that have framed post-apartheid South Africa: socioeconomic rights; labour issues and protests; black government vs. big business or “white economic elite”. The findings show that despite an increase in black ownership, “inferential racism” of blackness pervades content. The nature of representation also coincides with decolonial theory’s concept of “non-being” and its enunciation of the colonised subject being the “damned of the earth”, in the near invisibility of black people’s struggles, hypervisibility of black leadership shortcomings, and in the depiction of protestors as inherently violent, disorderly, deviants, and criminals. The study concludes that in the case of South Africa ownership does not matter, a change from white ownership to considerable black ownership since 1994 did not significantly “transform” historical racist tropes of blackness in content.","PeriodicalId":54049,"journal":{"name":"African Journalism Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Black Economic Empowerment Ownership Matter? A Decolonial Analysis of “Black Visibility” in South Africa’s Print Media Content, 1994–2014\",\"authors\":\"Prinola Govenden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ownership is identified as one of the major factors that influence the production of news. South Africa’s print media transformation situation presents an important Global South case study for journalism debates about ownership effects on news. The country’s media transformation agenda is based on the premise that transformation of ownership will automatically lead to a transformation of content on these levels. This study empirically examines whether the racial changes in print media ownership facilitated by black economic empowerment in the first 20 years of South Africa’s democracy (1994–2014) led to transformation of content with a focus on racial stereotypes of blackness. It conducts a decolonial analysis of the representation of blackness in three issues that have framed post-apartheid South Africa: socioeconomic rights; labour issues and protests; black government vs. big business or “white economic elite”. The findings show that despite an increase in black ownership, “inferential racism” of blackness pervades content. The nature of representation also coincides with decolonial theory’s concept of “non-being” and its enunciation of the colonised subject being the “damned of the earth”, in the near invisibility of black people’s struggles, hypervisibility of black leadership shortcomings, and in the depiction of protestors as inherently violent, disorderly, deviants, and criminals. The study concludes that in the case of South Africa ownership does not matter, a change from white ownership to considerable black ownership since 1994 did not significantly “transform” historical racist tropes of blackness in content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journalism Studies\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journalism Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2022.2096090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Black Economic Empowerment Ownership Matter? A Decolonial Analysis of “Black Visibility” in South Africa’s Print Media Content, 1994–2014
ABSTRACT Ownership is identified as one of the major factors that influence the production of news. South Africa’s print media transformation situation presents an important Global South case study for journalism debates about ownership effects on news. The country’s media transformation agenda is based on the premise that transformation of ownership will automatically lead to a transformation of content on these levels. This study empirically examines whether the racial changes in print media ownership facilitated by black economic empowerment in the first 20 years of South Africa’s democracy (1994–2014) led to transformation of content with a focus on racial stereotypes of blackness. It conducts a decolonial analysis of the representation of blackness in three issues that have framed post-apartheid South Africa: socioeconomic rights; labour issues and protests; black government vs. big business or “white economic elite”. The findings show that despite an increase in black ownership, “inferential racism” of blackness pervades content. The nature of representation also coincides with decolonial theory’s concept of “non-being” and its enunciation of the colonised subject being the “damned of the earth”, in the near invisibility of black people’s struggles, hypervisibility of black leadership shortcomings, and in the depiction of protestors as inherently violent, disorderly, deviants, and criminals. The study concludes that in the case of South Africa ownership does not matter, a change from white ownership to considerable black ownership since 1994 did not significantly “transform” historical racist tropes of blackness in content.
期刊介绍:
Accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training for university research purposes African Journalism Studies subscribes to the Code of Best Practice for Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journals of the Academy of Science of South Africa. African Journalism Studies ( AJS) aims to contribute to the ongoing extension of the theories, methodologies and empirical data to under-researched areas of knowledge production, through its emphasis on African journalism studies within a broader, comparative perspective of the Global South. AJS strives for theoretical diversity and methodological inclusivity, by developing theoretical approaches and making critical interventions in global scholarly debates. The journal''s comparative and interdisciplinary approach is informed by the related fields of cultural and media studies, communication studies, African studies, politics, and sociology. The field of journalism studies is understood broadly, as including the practices, norms, value systems, frameworks of representation, audiences, platforms, industries, theories and power relations that relate to the production, consumption and study of journalism. A wide definition of journalism is used, which extends beyond news and current affairs to include digital and social media, documentary film and narrative non-fiction.