体外受精的不良反应问题

IF 0.6
R. Kalinin, E. Barinov, Sergey Dzhuvalyakov, O. Romanova
{"title":"体外受精的不良反应问题","authors":"R. Kalinin, E. Barinov, Sergey Dzhuvalyakov, O. Romanova","doi":"10.35630/2023/13/4.805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the issues of regulation of practical activities related to the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Currently, disputes about the quality and the results of in vitro fertilization, surrogacy and the use of other methods of infertility treatment are considered to be mainly in the realm of civil litigation. However, even the most high-tech medical devices are associated with a certain degree of risk to life and health. Cases of fatal outcomes among mothers or babies after the use of ART lead to the initiation of criminal cases against healthcare providers. At the same time, the forensic methodology of investigating such cases requires a commission forensic medical examination, the results of which become the major stumbling block at all stages of criminal proceedings. There are challenges in the organization and methodological support of the work of the investigation, the prosecutor's office and the courts. Especially, when several experts with opposite views clash in court over a case, where they completely or partially refute each other. In our paper we highlight an example of such a case to improve legislation and judicial practice in this area.","PeriodicalId":51770,"journal":{"name":"Archiv EuroMedica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ISSUE OF ADVERSE EFFECTS IN CASE OF VITRO FERTILIZATION\",\"authors\":\"R. Kalinin, E. Barinov, Sergey Dzhuvalyakov, O. Romanova\",\"doi\":\"10.35630/2023/13/4.805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the issues of regulation of practical activities related to the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Currently, disputes about the quality and the results of in vitro fertilization, surrogacy and the use of other methods of infertility treatment are considered to be mainly in the realm of civil litigation. However, even the most high-tech medical devices are associated with a certain degree of risk to life and health. Cases of fatal outcomes among mothers or babies after the use of ART lead to the initiation of criminal cases against healthcare providers. At the same time, the forensic methodology of investigating such cases requires a commission forensic medical examination, the results of which become the major stumbling block at all stages of criminal proceedings. There are challenges in the organization and methodological support of the work of the investigation, the prosecutor's office and the courts. Especially, when several experts with opposite views clash in court over a case, where they completely or partially refute each other. In our paper we highlight an example of such a case to improve legislation and judicial practice in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv EuroMedica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv EuroMedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35630/2023/13/4.805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv EuroMedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35630/2023/13/4.805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了与使用辅助生殖技术(ART)有关的实际活动的监管问题。目前,关于体外受精、代孕和其他不孕症治疗方法的质量和结果的争议被认为主要是在民事诉讼领域。然而,即使是最高科技的医疗设备也会给生命和健康带来一定程度的风险。使用抗逆转录病毒治疗后母亲或婴儿死亡的病例导致对卫生保健提供者提起刑事诉讼。同时,调查这类案件的法医方法要求委员会进行法医检查,其结果成为刑事诉讼所有阶段的主要障碍。在调查工作、检察官办公室和法院的组织和方法支持方面存在挑战。特别是当几个持相反观点的专家在法庭上就一个案件发生冲突时,他们完全或部分地反驳对方。在本文中,我们着重列举了一个这样的案例,以完善这一领域的立法和司法实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE ISSUE OF ADVERSE EFFECTS IN CASE OF VITRO FERTILIZATION
The article deals with the issues of regulation of practical activities related to the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Currently, disputes about the quality and the results of in vitro fertilization, surrogacy and the use of other methods of infertility treatment are considered to be mainly in the realm of civil litigation. However, even the most high-tech medical devices are associated with a certain degree of risk to life and health. Cases of fatal outcomes among mothers or babies after the use of ART lead to the initiation of criminal cases against healthcare providers. At the same time, the forensic methodology of investigating such cases requires a commission forensic medical examination, the results of which become the major stumbling block at all stages of criminal proceedings. There are challenges in the organization and methodological support of the work of the investigation, the prosecutor's office and the courts. Especially, when several experts with opposite views clash in court over a case, where they completely or partially refute each other. In our paper we highlight an example of such a case to improve legislation and judicial practice in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archiv EuroMedica
Archiv EuroMedica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
83.30%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信