后启蒙坡:从《失窃的信》和《莫诺斯与尤娜的对话》看现代性的病态

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Sofía Martinicorena
{"title":"后启蒙坡:从《失窃的信》和《莫诺斯与尤娜的对话》看现代性的病态","authors":"Sofía Martinicorena","doi":"10.26754/OJS_MISC/MJ.20205154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper delves into the long-debated tensions that critics have found in Edgar Allan Poe (1809-1849)’s writings, which have placed him as a liminal figure between the Enlightenment and Romanticism. In particular, I will maintain that these tensions are representative of the contradictions inherent in the modern project, which I will argue are present in Poe’s writings and which situate Poe’s texts as both a symptom of and a reaction to the pathologies of modernity. To this end, I will consider Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno’s Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), arguing that the problems addressed in the volume were foreshadowed by Poe’s writings a century earlier. After a brief introduction, I will analyse the widely-discussed “The Purloined Letter” (1844) and the attitudes towards rationality that Poe presents in the story. I will then explore the lesser-known “The Colloquy of Monos and Una” (1841),2 where Poe anticipates some of the problems that Horkheimer and Adorno voiced, most notably the confusion between progress and technification.","PeriodicalId":35132,"journal":{"name":"Miscelanea","volume":"62 1","pages":"109-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Enlightened Poe: Analysing the Pathologies of Modernity in \\\"The Purloined Letter\\\" and \\\"The Colloquy of Monos and Una\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Sofía Martinicorena\",\"doi\":\"10.26754/OJS_MISC/MJ.20205154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper delves into the long-debated tensions that critics have found in Edgar Allan Poe (1809-1849)’s writings, which have placed him as a liminal figure between the Enlightenment and Romanticism. In particular, I will maintain that these tensions are representative of the contradictions inherent in the modern project, which I will argue are present in Poe’s writings and which situate Poe’s texts as both a symptom of and a reaction to the pathologies of modernity. To this end, I will consider Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno’s Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), arguing that the problems addressed in the volume were foreshadowed by Poe’s writings a century earlier. After a brief introduction, I will analyse the widely-discussed “The Purloined Letter” (1844) and the attitudes towards rationality that Poe presents in the story. I will then explore the lesser-known “The Colloquy of Monos and Una” (1841),2 where Poe anticipates some of the problems that Horkheimer and Adorno voiced, most notably the confusion between progress and technification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Miscelanea\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"109-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Miscelanea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26754/OJS_MISC/MJ.20205154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miscelanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/OJS_MISC/MJ.20205154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文深入探讨了评论家们在爱伦·坡(1809-1849)的作品中发现的长期争论的紧张关系,这些紧张关系使他成为启蒙运动和浪漫主义之间的边缘人物。特别是,我将坚持认为,这些紧张关系代表了现代项目中固有的矛盾,我将认为这些矛盾存在于坡的作品中,并将坡的文本定位为现代性病态的症状和反应。为此,我将考虑马克斯·霍克海默和西奥多·W·阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》(1944),认为这本书中提到的问题是坡一个世纪前的著作所预示的。在简单介绍之后,我将分析广受讨论的《被偷走的信》(1844)以及爱伦·坡在故事中对理性的态度。然后,我将探讨鲜为人知的《莫诺斯和乌纳的座谈会》(1841),2坡在其中预见到了霍克海默和阿多诺所表达的一些问题,尤其是进步和技术化之间的混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-Enlightened Poe: Analysing the Pathologies of Modernity in "The Purloined Letter" and "The Colloquy of Monos and Una"
This paper delves into the long-debated tensions that critics have found in Edgar Allan Poe (1809-1849)’s writings, which have placed him as a liminal figure between the Enlightenment and Romanticism. In particular, I will maintain that these tensions are representative of the contradictions inherent in the modern project, which I will argue are present in Poe’s writings and which situate Poe’s texts as both a symptom of and a reaction to the pathologies of modernity. To this end, I will consider Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno’s Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), arguing that the problems addressed in the volume were foreshadowed by Poe’s writings a century earlier. After a brief introduction, I will analyse the widely-discussed “The Purloined Letter” (1844) and the attitudes towards rationality that Poe presents in the story. I will then explore the lesser-known “The Colloquy of Monos and Una” (1841),2 where Poe anticipates some of the problems that Horkheimer and Adorno voiced, most notably the confusion between progress and technification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Miscelanea
Miscelanea Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信