生态自我与歌德的第三条道路

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN
Monatshefte Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.3368/m.115.1.42
L. Bauer
{"title":"生态自我与歌德的第三条道路","authors":"L. Bauer","doi":"10.3368/m.115.1.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Goethe’s response, primarily in his work in plant morphology and chromatics, to the competing demands on modern science that emanated from the mechanical philosophy of the Enlightenment and Kant’s transcendentalism. These philosophies differed fundamentally in their understanding of the relationship between subject and object, foregrounding questions about the respective roles of “idea” and “experience” in scientific inquiry. Goethe’s complex mediation of these opposing worldviews seeks a resolution to the dualism between mind and world, which I argue has significant implications for environmental ethics today. I examine Goethe’s anticipation, in his resistance to the division between culture and nature, of key tenets of environmental philosophy, as he searched instead for continuity between the human and non-human world. Goethe’s refusal to distinguish humans from the rest of nature, emphasizing rather their interdependence, points towards the concepts of ontological egalitarianism and ecological self-realization that are fundamental to the deep ecology movement. This places Goethe at the forefront of a genealogy of thinkers who have examined the cultural underpinnings of the environmental crisis and suggests that the “ecological self” had already found a model in Goethe’s thought. (LB)","PeriodicalId":54028,"journal":{"name":"Monatshefte","volume":"115 1","pages":"42 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological Selfhood and Goethe’s Third Way between Erfahrung and Idee\",\"authors\":\"L. Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/m.115.1.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines Goethe’s response, primarily in his work in plant morphology and chromatics, to the competing demands on modern science that emanated from the mechanical philosophy of the Enlightenment and Kant’s transcendentalism. These philosophies differed fundamentally in their understanding of the relationship between subject and object, foregrounding questions about the respective roles of “idea” and “experience” in scientific inquiry. Goethe’s complex mediation of these opposing worldviews seeks a resolution to the dualism between mind and world, which I argue has significant implications for environmental ethics today. I examine Goethe’s anticipation, in his resistance to the division between culture and nature, of key tenets of environmental philosophy, as he searched instead for continuity between the human and non-human world. Goethe’s refusal to distinguish humans from the rest of nature, emphasizing rather their interdependence, points towards the concepts of ontological egalitarianism and ecological self-realization that are fundamental to the deep ecology movement. This places Goethe at the forefront of a genealogy of thinkers who have examined the cultural underpinnings of the environmental crisis and suggests that the “ecological self” had already found a model in Goethe’s thought. (LB)\",\"PeriodicalId\":54028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monatshefte\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"42 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monatshefte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.1.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatshefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.1.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了歌德对启蒙运动的机械哲学和康德的超验主义对现代科学的竞争要求的回应,主要是在他的植物形态学和色彩学作品中。这些哲学在理解主体和客体之间的关系方面存在根本差异,突出了“观念”和“经验”在科学探究中各自作用的问题。歌德对这些对立世界观的复杂调解寻求解决心灵和世界之间的二元论,我认为这对当今的环境伦理学具有重要意义。我考察了歌德在抵制文化与自然之间的分裂时对环境哲学关键原则的预期,因为他寻求人类与非人类世界之间的连续性。歌德拒绝将人类与自然界的其他部分区分开来,而是强调它们的相互依存性,这指向了本体论平等主义和生态自我实现的概念,这是深层生态学运动的基础。这将歌德置于思想家谱系的最前沿,这些思想家研究了环境危机的文化基础,并表明“生态自我”已经在歌德的思想中找到了一个模式。(磅)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological Selfhood and Goethe’s Third Way between Erfahrung and Idee
This article examines Goethe’s response, primarily in his work in plant morphology and chromatics, to the competing demands on modern science that emanated from the mechanical philosophy of the Enlightenment and Kant’s transcendentalism. These philosophies differed fundamentally in their understanding of the relationship between subject and object, foregrounding questions about the respective roles of “idea” and “experience” in scientific inquiry. Goethe’s complex mediation of these opposing worldviews seeks a resolution to the dualism between mind and world, which I argue has significant implications for environmental ethics today. I examine Goethe’s anticipation, in his resistance to the division between culture and nature, of key tenets of environmental philosophy, as he searched instead for continuity between the human and non-human world. Goethe’s refusal to distinguish humans from the rest of nature, emphasizing rather their interdependence, points towards the concepts of ontological egalitarianism and ecological self-realization that are fundamental to the deep ecology movement. This places Goethe at the forefront of a genealogy of thinkers who have examined the cultural underpinnings of the environmental crisis and suggests that the “ecological self” had already found a model in Goethe’s thought. (LB)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monatshefte
Monatshefte LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信