希望是克服不可避免危险的工具

IF 0.4 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Alexandra Muszynski
{"title":"希望是克服不可避免危险的工具","authors":"Alexandra Muszynski","doi":"10.1080/10402659.2022.2126722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H do we get from where we are to where we want to be? One can reflect on this question on multitudinous levels, whether personally, nationally, or globally. There are three key elements to attempting to answer this question: the first is understanding where we are in the present moment, and meaningfully diagnosing the problems of today that we wish to address; the second is being able to conceptualize a different future, a vision for a future one sees as a normative improvement; the third element is the how, how do we build the pathways that link the present to a conceptual better future? This essay will examine one significant barrier we must overcome to conceptualize and actualize a better future, and one important tool for overcoming said barrier. The barrier is the “politics of inevitability” as defined by Timothy D. Snyder (2018), and the way through it is “Hope” as defined by Charles S. Snyder (2002). Timothy D. Snyder (2018) defines the politics of inevitability as:","PeriodicalId":51831,"journal":{"name":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hope as a Tool to Overcome the Dangers of Inevitability\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Muszynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10402659.2022.2126722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"H do we get from where we are to where we want to be? One can reflect on this question on multitudinous levels, whether personally, nationally, or globally. There are three key elements to attempting to answer this question: the first is understanding where we are in the present moment, and meaningfully diagnosing the problems of today that we wish to address; the second is being able to conceptualize a different future, a vision for a future one sees as a normative improvement; the third element is the how, how do we build the pathways that link the present to a conceptual better future? This essay will examine one significant barrier we must overcome to conceptualize and actualize a better future, and one important tool for overcoming said barrier. The barrier is the “politics of inevitability” as defined by Timothy D. Snyder (2018), and the way through it is “Hope” as defined by Charles S. Snyder (2002). Timothy D. Snyder (2018) defines the politics of inevitability as:\",\"PeriodicalId\":51831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2022.2126722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2022.2126722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

H我们能从现在的位置到达我们想去的地方吗?人们可以从多个层面来思考这个问题,无论是个人层面、国家层面还是全球层面。试图回答这个问题有三个关键要素:第一,了解我们目前的处境,并有意义地诊断我们希望解决的当今问题;第二是能够概念化一个不同的未来,一个人们认为是规范性改进的未来愿景;第三个要素是我们如何,如何构建将现在与概念上更美好的未来联系起来的道路?本文将探讨我们必须克服的一个重要障碍,即构想和实现一个更美好的未来,以及克服这一障碍的重要工具。障碍是蒂莫西·D·斯奈德(Timothy D.Snyder,2018)定义的“不可避免的政治”,而通过它的途径是查尔斯·S·斯奈德的“希望”(Charles S.Snyder)(2002)定义的。Timothy D.Snyder(2018)将不可避免的政治定义为:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hope as a Tool to Overcome the Dangers of Inevitability
H do we get from where we are to where we want to be? One can reflect on this question on multitudinous levels, whether personally, nationally, or globally. There are three key elements to attempting to answer this question: the first is understanding where we are in the present moment, and meaningfully diagnosing the problems of today that we wish to address; the second is being able to conceptualize a different future, a vision for a future one sees as a normative improvement; the third element is the how, how do we build the pathways that link the present to a conceptual better future? This essay will examine one significant barrier we must overcome to conceptualize and actualize a better future, and one important tool for overcoming said barrier. The barrier is the “politics of inevitability” as defined by Timothy D. Snyder (2018), and the way through it is “Hope” as defined by Charles S. Snyder (2002). Timothy D. Snyder (2018) defines the politics of inevitability as:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信