权力下放和国际人权监测机制

Brice Dickson
{"title":"权力下放和国际人权监测机制","authors":"Brice Dickson","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses how the protection of human rights in the three devolved regions of the United Kingdom (UK) has been periodically monitored at the international level since devolution took effect in 1999. It looks at the work of the 10 United Nations monitoring mechanisms to which the UK has subscribed and at seven Council of Europe mechanisms. A summary is provided of the degree to which the UK’s national reports, responses to lists of issues and replies to questionnaires have referred to human rights issues in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and there is then a summary of references made to those jurisdictions in the monitoring body’s concluding observations or reports, especially when the references express concerns about whether the rights in question are being fully protected in accordance with treaty requirements. The analysis reveals that UK national reports do now include a lot of information about how rights are protected in the devolved regions, even if the devolved administrations themselves, especially in Northern Ireland, are not always as cooperative as they should be in compiling the national reports. The monitoring bodies also now pay close attention to regional variations in the protection of rights and at times issue recommendations directed at the devolved administrations, while emphasising that the UK Government has ultimate responsibility for compliance with treaty obligations. The case study illustrates various well-known defects in the international monitoring system, such as delays, duplication of effort and lack of enforcement powers.","PeriodicalId":83211,"journal":{"name":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Devolution and international human rights monitoring mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Brice Dickson\",\"doi\":\"10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses how the protection of human rights in the three devolved regions of the United Kingdom (UK) has been periodically monitored at the international level since devolution took effect in 1999. It looks at the work of the 10 United Nations monitoring mechanisms to which the UK has subscribed and at seven Council of Europe mechanisms. A summary is provided of the degree to which the UK’s national reports, responses to lists of issues and replies to questionnaires have referred to human rights issues in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and there is then a summary of references made to those jurisdictions in the monitoring body’s concluding observations or reports, especially when the references express concerns about whether the rights in question are being fully protected in accordance with treaty requirements. The analysis reveals that UK national reports do now include a lot of information about how rights are protected in the devolved regions, even if the devolved administrations themselves, especially in Northern Ireland, are not always as cooperative as they should be in compiling the national reports. The monitoring bodies also now pay close attention to regional variations in the protection of rights and at times issue recommendations directed at the devolved administrations, while emphasising that the UK Government has ultimate responsibility for compliance with treaty obligations. The case study illustrates various well-known defects in the international monitoring system, such as delays, duplication of effort and lack of enforcement powers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Northern Ireland legal quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了自1999年权力下放生效以来,如何在国际一级定期监测联合王国三个权力下放地区的人权保护情况。它考察了英国加入的10个联合国监测机制和7个欧洲委员会机制的工作。英国的国家报告、对问题清单的答复和对调查表的答复在多大程度上提到了苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的人权问题,特别是当提及内容表达了对有关权利是否按照条约要求得到充分保护的关切时。分析显示,英国的国家报告现在确实包含了许多关于权力下放地区如何保护权利的信息,即使权力下放的政府本身,特别是北爱尔兰的政府,在编制国家报告时并不总是像他们应该的那样合作。监督机构现在还密切关注保护权利方面的地区差异,有时针对权力下放的行政部门提出建议,同时强调英国政府对遵守条约义务负有最终责任。案例研究说明了国际监测系统中众所周知的各种缺陷,如拖延、工作重复和缺乏执行权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Devolution and international human rights monitoring mechanisms
This article analyses how the protection of human rights in the three devolved regions of the United Kingdom (UK) has been periodically monitored at the international level since devolution took effect in 1999. It looks at the work of the 10 United Nations monitoring mechanisms to which the UK has subscribed and at seven Council of Europe mechanisms. A summary is provided of the degree to which the UK’s national reports, responses to lists of issues and replies to questionnaires have referred to human rights issues in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and there is then a summary of references made to those jurisdictions in the monitoring body’s concluding observations or reports, especially when the references express concerns about whether the rights in question are being fully protected in accordance with treaty requirements. The analysis reveals that UK national reports do now include a lot of information about how rights are protected in the devolved regions, even if the devolved administrations themselves, especially in Northern Ireland, are not always as cooperative as they should be in compiling the national reports. The monitoring bodies also now pay close attention to regional variations in the protection of rights and at times issue recommendations directed at the devolved administrations, while emphasising that the UK Government has ultimate responsibility for compliance with treaty obligations. The case study illustrates various well-known defects in the international monitoring system, such as delays, duplication of effort and lack of enforcement powers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信