过去与现在:有色人种女性原创性与女性与性别研究中的选集冲动

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Samantha Pinto, J. Nash
{"title":"过去与现在:有色人种女性原创性与女性与性别研究中的选集冲动","authors":"Samantha Pinto, J. Nash","doi":"10.1353/fem.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We analyze This Bridge Called My Back and Some of Us Are Brave as anthologies, and emphasize the fact of the anthology as a key vehicle for producing \"women of color\" (WOC) as a legible and coherent category. Indeed, even as both anthologies refuse the notion of WOC as a coherent category, they now circulate in women's studies as texts that, in and of themselves, stand in for \"women of color.\" Offering intellectual conversation in the form of a book, treating the anthology as the performance of \"bridging\" that can, as Toni Cade Bambara noted, \"coax us into the habit of listening to each other and learning each other's ways of seeing and being\" (vii), these anthologies have puzzlingly circulated as literal commodities of difference, standing in for difference rather than interrogating it (and for Some of Us, frequently only as an idea of its title itself). We argue that the circulation of these texts as WOC texts is particular of the current moment in the genesis of the field's ongoing institutionalization, retaining defensive postures even while institutionalization has disappeared the work that came in between then--these two anthologies-- and now, in the critical moment where Blackness is coming to stand in for all difference, and intersectionality as the institutional cure for women's studies and the intellectual property of Black feminism.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Then and Now: Women of Color Originalism and the Anthological Impulse in Women's and Gender Studies\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Pinto, J. Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fem.2022.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:We analyze This Bridge Called My Back and Some of Us Are Brave as anthologies, and emphasize the fact of the anthology as a key vehicle for producing \\\"women of color\\\" (WOC) as a legible and coherent category. Indeed, even as both anthologies refuse the notion of WOC as a coherent category, they now circulate in women's studies as texts that, in and of themselves, stand in for \\\"women of color.\\\" Offering intellectual conversation in the form of a book, treating the anthology as the performance of \\\"bridging\\\" that can, as Toni Cade Bambara noted, \\\"coax us into the habit of listening to each other and learning each other's ways of seeing and being\\\" (vii), these anthologies have puzzlingly circulated as literal commodities of difference, standing in for difference rather than interrogating it (and for Some of Us, frequently only as an idea of its title itself). We argue that the circulation of these texts as WOC texts is particular of the current moment in the genesis of the field's ongoing institutionalization, retaining defensive postures even while institutionalization has disappeared the work that came in between then--these two anthologies-- and now, in the critical moment where Blackness is coming to stand in for all difference, and intersectionality as the institutional cure for women's studies and the intellectual property of Black feminism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文将《这是我的背》和《我们中的一些人是勇敢的》作为选集进行分析,强调选集是将“有色人种女性”(women of color, WOC)作为一个清晰、连贯的范畴的重要载体。事实上,尽管这两本选集都拒绝将WOC作为一个连贯的类别,但它们现在在女性研究中作为文本流传,它们本身就代表着“有色人种女性”。以书的形式提供智力对话,将选集视为“桥梁”的表演,正如托尼·凯德·班巴拉(Toni Cade Bambara)所指出的那样,可以“哄我们养成相互倾听和学习彼此看待和存在方式的习惯”(vii),这些选集令人困惑地作为差异的字面商品传播,代表差异而不是质疑它(对我们中的一些人来说,经常只是作为其标题本身的想法)。我们认为这些文本的循环WOC文本特殊的当前时刻的起源领域正在进行的制度化,保持防守姿势尽管制度化已经消失了之间的工作,然后,这两个选集——现在,在关键时刻,黑暗即将站在所有不同,和交集机构治疗女性研究和知识产权的黑人女权主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Then and Now: Women of Color Originalism and the Anthological Impulse in Women's and Gender Studies
Abstract:We analyze This Bridge Called My Back and Some of Us Are Brave as anthologies, and emphasize the fact of the anthology as a key vehicle for producing "women of color" (WOC) as a legible and coherent category. Indeed, even as both anthologies refuse the notion of WOC as a coherent category, they now circulate in women's studies as texts that, in and of themselves, stand in for "women of color." Offering intellectual conversation in the form of a book, treating the anthology as the performance of "bridging" that can, as Toni Cade Bambara noted, "coax us into the habit of listening to each other and learning each other's ways of seeing and being" (vii), these anthologies have puzzlingly circulated as literal commodities of difference, standing in for difference rather than interrogating it (and for Some of Us, frequently only as an idea of its title itself). We argue that the circulation of these texts as WOC texts is particular of the current moment in the genesis of the field's ongoing institutionalization, retaining defensive postures even while institutionalization has disappeared the work that came in between then--these two anthologies-- and now, in the critical moment where Blackness is coming to stand in for all difference, and intersectionality as the institutional cure for women's studies and the intellectual property of Black feminism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信