{"title":"走向一种基于描述性问题的心理健康分类法:生物医学模型的非医学化出路","authors":"Arnoldo Cantú","doi":"10.1177/00221678231167612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychiatric diagnoses found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM) and International Classification of Diseases ( ICD) are pervasive in the field of mental health to help individuals access services such as psychotherapy. In the United States, they are used for insurance reimbursement purposes and by providers in client–clinician encounters. Psychiatric disorders tend to be subsumed under the biomedical model of mental health and have been critiqued for contributing to iatrogenic harm and stigma in addition to fundamental concerns about their validity and reliability. However, current practice of requiring psychiatric diagnoses within health care systems occurs due to federal regulations and does not allow for the formal use of alternative taxonomies, forcing clinicians and clients into the biomedical model. This article will explicate key stakeholders involved and technicalities dictating the use of psychiatric diagnoses. It will introduce an organizing framework, borrowing from the field of social work accompanied by an example of how the field can move away from the biomedical model given the regulations at play. This article proposes the interdisciplinary development of an alternative nonmedicalized, psychosocial, and codified descriptive problem-based taxonomy that can decouple psychiatric diagnosis from the eligibility for and provision of mental health services.","PeriodicalId":47290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Descriptive Problem-Based Taxonomy for Mental Health: A Nonmedicalized Way Out of the Biomedical Model\",\"authors\":\"Arnoldo Cantú\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00221678231167612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Psychiatric diagnoses found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM) and International Classification of Diseases ( ICD) are pervasive in the field of mental health to help individuals access services such as psychotherapy. In the United States, they are used for insurance reimbursement purposes and by providers in client–clinician encounters. Psychiatric disorders tend to be subsumed under the biomedical model of mental health and have been critiqued for contributing to iatrogenic harm and stigma in addition to fundamental concerns about their validity and reliability. However, current practice of requiring psychiatric diagnoses within health care systems occurs due to federal regulations and does not allow for the formal use of alternative taxonomies, forcing clinicians and clients into the biomedical model. This article will explicate key stakeholders involved and technicalities dictating the use of psychiatric diagnoses. It will introduce an organizing framework, borrowing from the field of social work accompanied by an example of how the field can move away from the biomedical model given the regulations at play. This article proposes the interdisciplinary development of an alternative nonmedicalized, psychosocial, and codified descriptive problem-based taxonomy that can decouple psychiatric diagnosis from the eligibility for and provision of mental health services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Humanistic Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Humanistic Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231167612\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231167612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a Descriptive Problem-Based Taxonomy for Mental Health: A Nonmedicalized Way Out of the Biomedical Model
Psychiatric diagnoses found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM) and International Classification of Diseases ( ICD) are pervasive in the field of mental health to help individuals access services such as psychotherapy. In the United States, they are used for insurance reimbursement purposes and by providers in client–clinician encounters. Psychiatric disorders tend to be subsumed under the biomedical model of mental health and have been critiqued for contributing to iatrogenic harm and stigma in addition to fundamental concerns about their validity and reliability. However, current practice of requiring psychiatric diagnoses within health care systems occurs due to federal regulations and does not allow for the formal use of alternative taxonomies, forcing clinicians and clients into the biomedical model. This article will explicate key stakeholders involved and technicalities dictating the use of psychiatric diagnoses. It will introduce an organizing framework, borrowing from the field of social work accompanied by an example of how the field can move away from the biomedical model given the regulations at play. This article proposes the interdisciplinary development of an alternative nonmedicalized, psychosocial, and codified descriptive problem-based taxonomy that can decouple psychiatric diagnosis from the eligibility for and provision of mental health services.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Humanistic Psychology is an interdisciplinary forum for contributions, controversies and diverse statements pertaining to humanistic psychology. It addresses personal growth, interpersonal encounters, social problems and philosophical issues. An international journal of human potential, self-actualization, the search for meaning and social change, the Journal of Humanistic Psychology was founded by Abraham Maslow and Anthony Sutich in 1961. It is the official journal of the Association for Humanistic Psychology.