关于过渡中的证据和个人经历

L. Pape
{"title":"关于过渡中的证据和个人经历","authors":"L. Pape","doi":"10.1515/jtm-2020-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Figure 1: The evidence pyramid. next, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the very top (Figure 1A). As there are often methodological problems with reviews, these have been separated from the rest of the pyramid (Figure 1B) and the hierarchy of the different study types themselves has been less strictly applied. For example, somewell-designed case-controlled studies with larger number of patients might give better evidence than weak cohort studies (Figure 1C). Especially if the number of randomized controlled trials (RCT) is low","PeriodicalId":93792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transition medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jtm-2020-0005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"About evidence and personal experiences in transition\",\"authors\":\"L. Pape\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jtm-2020-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Figure 1: The evidence pyramid. next, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the very top (Figure 1A). As there are often methodological problems with reviews, these have been separated from the rest of the pyramid (Figure 1B) and the hierarchy of the different study types themselves has been less strictly applied. For example, somewell-designed case-controlled studies with larger number of patients might give better evidence than weak cohort studies (Figure 1C). Especially if the number of randomized controlled trials (RCT) is low\",\"PeriodicalId\":93792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of transition medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jtm-2020-0005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of transition medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jtm-2020-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of transition medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jtm-2020-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图1:证据金字塔。接下来,在顶部进行系统综述和荟萃分析(图1A)。由于综述经常存在方法论问题,这些综述已与金字塔的其他部分分开(图1B),不同研究类型的层次结构本身的应用也不那么严格。例如,一些设计良好、患者人数较多的病例对照研究可能比薄弱的队列研究提供更好的证据(图1C)。特别是如果随机对照试验(RCT)的数量较低
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
About evidence and personal experiences in transition
Figure 1: The evidence pyramid. next, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the very top (Figure 1A). As there are often methodological problems with reviews, these have been separated from the rest of the pyramid (Figure 1B) and the hierarchy of the different study types themselves has been less strictly applied. For example, somewell-designed case-controlled studies with larger number of patients might give better evidence than weak cohort studies (Figure 1C). Especially if the number of randomized controlled trials (RCT) is low
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信