去甲肾上腺素推注与输注预防剖宫产先兆子痫产妇脊髓后低血压的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Renu Wakhloo, R. Devi, Megha Gandotra, V. Kant
{"title":"去甲肾上腺素推注与输注预防剖宫产先兆子痫产妇脊髓后低血压的比较","authors":"Renu Wakhloo, R. Devi, Megha Gandotra, V. Kant","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_55_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Currently, spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is the anesthetic technique of choice for women with preeclampsia in the absence of contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia. Recently, norepinephrine has been introduced for prevention and treatment of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia; however, only a couple of studies have compared norepinephrine infusion and bolus. Aims: This study aims to compare primarily the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine bolus given therapeutically and norepinephrine infusion given prophylactically for management of hypotension and effects on other hemodynamic parameters in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia and secondarily to determine the effects of study drugs on neonatal Apgar score and arterial blood gas analysis of neonatal blood. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 100 singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18–35 years, diagnosed with preeclampsia (controlled on single antihypertensive drug with BP ≤140/90), scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: Received therapeutic norepinephrine bolus (4 μg) only when hypotension (fall in SBP to ≤20% of baseline) was detected after spinal anesthesia. Group B: Received prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine infusion (4 μg/min) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Results: Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure had statistically significant difference at 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10 mins of surgery. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of norepinephrine boluses used in Group A were higher and statistically significant (p-value < 0.001) than Group B. Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes as well as umbilical artery parameters in two groups was comparable and statistically insignificant (p-value 0.301 for Apgar at 1 min and P value 0.562 for Apgar at 5 mins). Conclusion: Although both norepinephrine bolus and infusion doses are an effective way to treat spinal anesthesia-related hypotension in patients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section with comparable maternal and fetal side effects, infusion dose of norepinephrine is better in maintaining hemodynamics of parturients with insignificant changes in neonatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":" 9","pages":"80 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of norepinephrine bolus versus infusion for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section\",\"authors\":\"Renu Wakhloo, R. Devi, Megha Gandotra, V. Kant\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_55_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Currently, spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is the anesthetic technique of choice for women with preeclampsia in the absence of contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia. Recently, norepinephrine has been introduced for prevention and treatment of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia; however, only a couple of studies have compared norepinephrine infusion and bolus. Aims: This study aims to compare primarily the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine bolus given therapeutically and norepinephrine infusion given prophylactically for management of hypotension and effects on other hemodynamic parameters in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia and secondarily to determine the effects of study drugs on neonatal Apgar score and arterial blood gas analysis of neonatal blood. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 100 singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18–35 years, diagnosed with preeclampsia (controlled on single antihypertensive drug with BP ≤140/90), scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: Received therapeutic norepinephrine bolus (4 μg) only when hypotension (fall in SBP to ≤20% of baseline) was detected after spinal anesthesia. Group B: Received prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine infusion (4 μg/min) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Results: Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure had statistically significant difference at 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10 mins of surgery. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of norepinephrine boluses used in Group A were higher and statistically significant (p-value < 0.001) than Group B. Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes as well as umbilical artery parameters in two groups was comparable and statistically insignificant (p-value 0.301 for Apgar at 1 min and P value 0.562 for Apgar at 5 mins). Conclusion: Although both norepinephrine bolus and infusion doses are an effective way to treat spinal anesthesia-related hypotension in patients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section with comparable maternal and fetal side effects, infusion dose of norepinephrine is better in maintaining hemodynamics of parturients with insignificant changes in neonatal outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"80 - 86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_55_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_55_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,脊髓麻醉是剖宫产术中对无神经轴麻醉禁忌症的子痫前期妇女的首选麻醉技术。最近,去甲肾上腺素已被引入预防和治疗与脊髓麻醉相关的低血压;然而,只有几个研究比较了去甲肾上腺素输注和大剂量。目的:本研究的主要目的是比较脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术中治疗性给予去甲肾上腺素丸和预防性给予去甲肾上腺素输注治疗低血压的疗效和安全性以及对其他血流动力学参数的影响,其次是确定研究药物对新生儿Apgar评分和新生儿血液动脉血气分析的影响。方法:前瞻性随机研究100例,年龄18-35岁,ASAⅱ级,诊断为子痫前期(单药降压药控制,血压≤140/90),脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产的单胎足月妊娠女性,随机分为两组。A组:仅在脊髓麻醉后出现低血压(收缩压降至≤基线的20%)时才给予治疗性去甲肾上腺素丸(4 μg)。B组:脊髓麻醉诱导后立即预防性静脉输注去甲肾上腺素(4 μg/min)。结果:手术3、4、5、6、7、8、9、10分钟时心率、收缩压、舒张压和平均血压差异有统计学意义。A组低血压发作次数、去甲肾上腺素用量均高于b组,且差异有统计学意义(P值< 0.001)。两组患者1、5分钟Apgar评分及脐动脉参数比较差异无统计学意义(1分钟Apgar P值为0.301,5分钟Apgar P值为0.562)。结论:虽然去甲肾上腺素灌注剂量和灌注剂量都是治疗剖宫产先兆子痫患者脊髓麻醉相关性低血压的有效方法,且母婴副反应相当,但灌注剂量的去甲肾上腺素在维持产妇血流动力学方面效果更好,对新生儿结局无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of norepinephrine bolus versus infusion for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section
Background: Currently, spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is the anesthetic technique of choice for women with preeclampsia in the absence of contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia. Recently, norepinephrine has been introduced for prevention and treatment of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia; however, only a couple of studies have compared norepinephrine infusion and bolus. Aims: This study aims to compare primarily the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine bolus given therapeutically and norepinephrine infusion given prophylactically for management of hypotension and effects on other hemodynamic parameters in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia and secondarily to determine the effects of study drugs on neonatal Apgar score and arterial blood gas analysis of neonatal blood. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 100 singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18–35 years, diagnosed with preeclampsia (controlled on single antihypertensive drug with BP ≤140/90), scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: Received therapeutic norepinephrine bolus (4 μg) only when hypotension (fall in SBP to ≤20% of baseline) was detected after spinal anesthesia. Group B: Received prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine infusion (4 μg/min) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Results: Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure had statistically significant difference at 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10 mins of surgery. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of norepinephrine boluses used in Group A were higher and statistically significant (p-value < 0.001) than Group B. Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes as well as umbilical artery parameters in two groups was comparable and statistically insignificant (p-value 0.301 for Apgar at 1 min and P value 0.562 for Apgar at 5 mins). Conclusion: Although both norepinephrine bolus and infusion doses are an effective way to treat spinal anesthesia-related hypotension in patients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section with comparable maternal and fetal side effects, infusion dose of norepinephrine is better in maintaining hemodynamics of parturients with insignificant changes in neonatal outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信