模拟客户法在药品价格审核中的应用系统综述

IF 0.9 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
K. Lee, Yaman Walid Kassab, N. A. Taha, Z. A. Zainal
{"title":"模拟客户法在药品价格审核中的应用系统综述","authors":"K. Lee, Yaman Walid Kassab, N. A. Taha, Z. A. Zainal","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1028178/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Purpose: This study was aimed to systematically identify and review studies conducted using simulated client/patients that examine medicine selling prices in healthcare settings, including pharmacies, clinics, and hospitals. The quoted drug pricing information, including the dispensing fees and healthcare financing system of the countries involved, were also compared.Design/methodology/approach: We searched Pubmed, OVID, Scopus, Ebsco (Medline) and ProQuest for papers reporting on simulated patient studies in various medical settings, specifying drug or pharmaceutical pricings. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, longitudinal studies, cohort or case–control studies, and descriptive studies were included. The quality of included studies was checked using a validated tool.Findings: A total of 19 papers from 13 countries from all regions of the world were included in this systematic review. Various ,edical conditions that were presented by the simulated patients, such as cancer, back pain, insomnia and diarrhoea. Information on certain prescription and non-prescription drugs such as buprenorphine, methadone and antibiotics were reported in four studies. Most healthcare facilities adhere to prescribed selling prices, according to the medicine selling price trend examined in this study. Only around half of the research found that medicine prices were higher than the typical selling price. Some countries that practise price control policies were found to have higher drug selling prices than those that do not.Originality/value: This review, for the first time, revealed that simulated patient method is a practical solution to obtain pharmaceutical price information from healthcare provider and most healthcare facilities adhere to the recommended selling prices.","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the use of simulated client method in examining medicine price\",\"authors\":\"K. Lee, Yaman Walid Kassab, N. A. Taha, Z. A. Zainal\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1028178/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Purpose: This study was aimed to systematically identify and review studies conducted using simulated client/patients that examine medicine selling prices in healthcare settings, including pharmacies, clinics, and hospitals. The quoted drug pricing information, including the dispensing fees and healthcare financing system of the countries involved, were also compared.Design/methodology/approach: We searched Pubmed, OVID, Scopus, Ebsco (Medline) and ProQuest for papers reporting on simulated patient studies in various medical settings, specifying drug or pharmaceutical pricings. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, longitudinal studies, cohort or case–control studies, and descriptive studies were included. The quality of included studies was checked using a validated tool.Findings: A total of 19 papers from 13 countries from all regions of the world were included in this systematic review. Various ,edical conditions that were presented by the simulated patients, such as cancer, back pain, insomnia and diarrhoea. Information on certain prescription and non-prescription drugs such as buprenorphine, methadone and antibiotics were reported in four studies. Most healthcare facilities adhere to prescribed selling prices, according to the medicine selling price trend examined in this study. Only around half of the research found that medicine prices were higher than the typical selling price. Some countries that practise price control policies were found to have higher drug selling prices than those that do not.Originality/value: This review, for the first time, revealed that simulated patient method is a practical solution to obtain pharmaceutical price information from healthcare provider and most healthcare facilities adhere to the recommended selling prices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1028178/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1028178/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究旨在系统地识别和审查使用模拟客户/患者进行的研究,这些研究检查了医疗机构(包括药店、诊所和医院)的药品销售价格。还比较了所引用的药品定价信息,包括相关国家的配药费和医疗融资系统。设计/方法/方法:我们在Pubmed、OVID、Scopus、Ebsco(Medline)和ProQuest上搜索了报告各种医疗环境中模拟患者研究的论文,详细说明了药物或药品价格。包括随机对照试验、非随机对照试验,纵向研究、队列或病例对照研究以及描述性研究。使用经验证的工具检查纳入研究的质量。研究结果:本系统综述共收录了来自世界各地区13个国家的19篇论文。模拟患者表现出的各种医疗状况,如癌症、背痛、失眠和腹泻。四项研究报告了丁丙诺啡、美沙酮和抗生素等某些处方药和非处方药的信息。根据本研究中检查的药品销售价格趋势,大多数医疗机构都遵守规定的销售价格。只有大约一半的研究发现,药品价格高于典型的销售价格。一些实行价格管制政策的国家的药品销售价格高于那些不实行价格管制的国家。独创性/价值:这篇综述首次揭示了模拟患者法是从医疗保健提供者那里获得药品价格信息的实用解决方案,大多数医疗保健机构都遵守建议的销售价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of the use of simulated client method in examining medicine price
Purpose: This study was aimed to systematically identify and review studies conducted using simulated client/patients that examine medicine selling prices in healthcare settings, including pharmacies, clinics, and hospitals. The quoted drug pricing information, including the dispensing fees and healthcare financing system of the countries involved, were also compared.Design/methodology/approach: We searched Pubmed, OVID, Scopus, Ebsco (Medline) and ProQuest for papers reporting on simulated patient studies in various medical settings, specifying drug or pharmaceutical pricings. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, longitudinal studies, cohort or case–control studies, and descriptive studies were included. The quality of included studies was checked using a validated tool.Findings: A total of 19 papers from 13 countries from all regions of the world were included in this systematic review. Various ,edical conditions that were presented by the simulated patients, such as cancer, back pain, insomnia and diarrhoea. Information on certain prescription and non-prescription drugs such as buprenorphine, methadone and antibiotics were reported in four studies. Most healthcare facilities adhere to prescribed selling prices, according to the medicine selling price trend examined in this study. Only around half of the research found that medicine prices were higher than the typical selling price. Some countries that practise price control policies were found to have higher drug selling prices than those that do not.Originality/value: This review, for the first time, revealed that simulated patient method is a practical solution to obtain pharmaceutical price information from healthcare provider and most healthcare facilities adhere to the recommended selling prices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Research
Journal of Health Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信