Ruihua Sun, Kangda Yu, Kai Xu, Huan Li, Ruimin Guo, Chang Xiao, Wanling Wu, Mei Song
{"title":"根据审评结果对同行审评专家进行回顾性选择的分析","authors":"Ruihua Sun, Kangda Yu, Kai Xu, Huan Li, Ruimin Guo, Chang Xiao, Wanling Wu, Mei Song","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nDiscussion on the methods of retrospectively selecting peer review experts based on the results of review. \n \n \nMethods \nBased on the review data of peer reviewers, peer review experts are retrospectively selected based on the voting, rating and comprehensive evaluations, as well as their variations and errors during the review. \n \n \nResults \nThrough the retrospective selection of peer reviewers, there is a better convergence of reviews, which assures the quality of future peer reviews. This method is superior to the prospective selection of peer reviewers. \n \n \nConclusions \nBased on the results of the review, retrospective selection of peer review experts is feasible and helpful for the selection of high-level peer review experts, which can improve the quality of peer review and standardize peer review. \n \n \nKey words: \nPeer review; Retrospective selection; Evaluation experts","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"25 6","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of retrospective selection of peer review experts based on the results of the review\",\"authors\":\"Ruihua Sun, Kangda Yu, Kai Xu, Huan Li, Ruimin Guo, Chang Xiao, Wanling Wu, Mei Song\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nDiscussion on the methods of retrospectively selecting peer review experts based on the results of review. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nBased on the review data of peer reviewers, peer review experts are retrospectively selected based on the voting, rating and comprehensive evaluations, as well as their variations and errors during the review. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThrough the retrospective selection of peer reviewers, there is a better convergence of reviews, which assures the quality of future peer reviews. This method is superior to the prospective selection of peer reviewers. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nBased on the results of the review, retrospective selection of peer review experts is feasible and helpful for the selection of high-level peer review experts, which can improve the quality of peer review and standardize peer review. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPeer review; Retrospective selection; Evaluation experts\",\"PeriodicalId\":59555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"18-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of retrospective selection of peer review experts based on the results of the review
Objective
Discussion on the methods of retrospectively selecting peer review experts based on the results of review.
Methods
Based on the review data of peer reviewers, peer review experts are retrospectively selected based on the voting, rating and comprehensive evaluations, as well as their variations and errors during the review.
Results
Through the retrospective selection of peer reviewers, there is a better convergence of reviews, which assures the quality of future peer reviews. This method is superior to the prospective selection of peer reviewers.
Conclusions
Based on the results of the review, retrospective selection of peer review experts is feasible and helpful for the selection of high-level peer review experts, which can improve the quality of peer review and standardize peer review.
Key words:
Peer review; Retrospective selection; Evaluation experts
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
