热带干燥林中两个不同演替阶段树种的草本和叶片特征

IF 0.9 Q4 ECOLOGY
Fernando Henrique de Sena, Bruno Melo Lustosa, Silvia Roberta Santos Silva, H. Falcão, J. S. de Almeida
{"title":"热带干燥林中两个不同演替阶段树种的草本和叶片特征","authors":"Fernando Henrique de Sena, Bruno Melo Lustosa, Silvia Roberta Santos Silva, H. Falcão, J. S. de Almeida","doi":"10.1080/23766808.2021.1953893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTARCT Leaf traits are analyzed as essential drivers for the evolutionary and ecological role of plant defense mechanisms. Plants show leaf trait variation as a response to the diverse environmental conditions, like different successional stages. Those variations can impact leaf herbivory rates and drive changes in the allocation of plant resources. In this study, we aimed at comparing the expression of leaf defenses in established plants over different successional stages in a tropical dry forest to understand how these defenses modify the plant–herbivore interactions based on herbivory rates. We analyzed physical leaf traits (specific leaf area, thickness, and density), nutrient content (N, P, and K), total phenolic compounds, and leaf herbivory, of the native tree species Aspidosperma pyrifolium and Cenostigma pyramidale, in early- and late-successional stage areas. Results showed that the plant investment in defenses varies according to the successional stage and that both species have similar defense strategies, confirming the resource availability hypothesis. Individuals from the early stage adopt a strategy to lower sclerophylly, higher nutrient content and less phenolic compounds, while the late-stage individuals showed an opposite behaviour. For both species in this study, the average percentage of leaf herbivory observed was 40% higher in the early compared to the late-stage area. Our data indicate that plant defenses are tightly coupled to sclerophylly and investments in secondary metabolites, and the environmental conditions of different successional stage drive that plasticity in such leaf traits.","PeriodicalId":36863,"journal":{"name":"Neotropical Biodiversity","volume":"39 18","pages":"266 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23766808.2021.1953893","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbivory and leaf traits of two tree species from different successional stages in a tropical dry forest\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Henrique de Sena, Bruno Melo Lustosa, Silvia Roberta Santos Silva, H. Falcão, J. S. de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23766808.2021.1953893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTARCT Leaf traits are analyzed as essential drivers for the evolutionary and ecological role of plant defense mechanisms. Plants show leaf trait variation as a response to the diverse environmental conditions, like different successional stages. Those variations can impact leaf herbivory rates and drive changes in the allocation of plant resources. In this study, we aimed at comparing the expression of leaf defenses in established plants over different successional stages in a tropical dry forest to understand how these defenses modify the plant–herbivore interactions based on herbivory rates. We analyzed physical leaf traits (specific leaf area, thickness, and density), nutrient content (N, P, and K), total phenolic compounds, and leaf herbivory, of the native tree species Aspidosperma pyrifolium and Cenostigma pyramidale, in early- and late-successional stage areas. Results showed that the plant investment in defenses varies according to the successional stage and that both species have similar defense strategies, confirming the resource availability hypothesis. Individuals from the early stage adopt a strategy to lower sclerophylly, higher nutrient content and less phenolic compounds, while the late-stage individuals showed an opposite behaviour. For both species in this study, the average percentage of leaf herbivory observed was 40% higher in the early compared to the late-stage area. Our data indicate that plant defenses are tightly coupled to sclerophylly and investments in secondary metabolites, and the environmental conditions of different successional stage drive that plasticity in such leaf traits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neotropical Biodiversity\",\"volume\":\"39 18\",\"pages\":\"266 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23766808.2021.1953893\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neotropical Biodiversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.1953893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neotropical Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.1953893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叶片性状被分析为植物防御机制进化和生态作用的重要驱动因素。植物表现出对不同环境条件的响应,如不同的演替阶段。这些变化可以影响叶片的草食率,并推动植物资源分配的变化。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较热带干燥森林中不同演替阶段已建立植物的叶片防御的表达,以了解这些防御如何根据食草动物率改变植物-食草动物的相互作用。我们分析了在演替早期和晚期地区,本地树种梨叶蜘蛛和锥状Cenostigma pyrifolium的物理叶片特征(比叶面积、厚度和密度)、营养成分(N、P和K)、总酚类化合物和叶片草食性。结果表明,植物对防御的投入因演替阶段而异,两个物种的防御策略相似,证实了资源可用性假说。早期个体采取的策略是降低硬度、提高营养含量和减少酚类化合物,而晚期个体则表现出相反的行为。对于本研究中的两个物种,与后期地区相比,早期观察到的叶片食草动物的平均百分比高出40%。我们的数据表明,植物防御与硬叶性和次生代谢产物的投资密切相关,不同演替阶段的环境条件驱动了这些叶片性状的可塑性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Herbivory and leaf traits of two tree species from different successional stages in a tropical dry forest
ABSTARCT Leaf traits are analyzed as essential drivers for the evolutionary and ecological role of plant defense mechanisms. Plants show leaf trait variation as a response to the diverse environmental conditions, like different successional stages. Those variations can impact leaf herbivory rates and drive changes in the allocation of plant resources. In this study, we aimed at comparing the expression of leaf defenses in established plants over different successional stages in a tropical dry forest to understand how these defenses modify the plant–herbivore interactions based on herbivory rates. We analyzed physical leaf traits (specific leaf area, thickness, and density), nutrient content (N, P, and K), total phenolic compounds, and leaf herbivory, of the native tree species Aspidosperma pyrifolium and Cenostigma pyramidale, in early- and late-successional stage areas. Results showed that the plant investment in defenses varies according to the successional stage and that both species have similar defense strategies, confirming the resource availability hypothesis. Individuals from the early stage adopt a strategy to lower sclerophylly, higher nutrient content and less phenolic compounds, while the late-stage individuals showed an opposite behaviour. For both species in this study, the average percentage of leaf herbivory observed was 40% higher in the early compared to the late-stage area. Our data indicate that plant defenses are tightly coupled to sclerophylly and investments in secondary metabolites, and the environmental conditions of different successional stage drive that plasticity in such leaf traits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neotropical Biodiversity
Neotropical Biodiversity Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信