进入21世纪的二十年——为有心理健康和其他残疾的大学生提供与科技相关的便利

C. Fichten, Alice Havel, M. Jorgensen, Susie Wileman, J. Budd
{"title":"进入21世纪的二十年——为有心理健康和其他残疾的大学生提供与科技相关的便利","authors":"C. Fichten, Alice Havel, M. Jorgensen, Susie Wileman, J. Budd","doi":"10.11114/jets.v10i4.5594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtually all North American two- and four-year colleges provide accommodations to their increasing numbers of students with disabilities. To explore technology and non-technology related accommodations for these students we surveyed 118 Canadian two- and four-year college students who self-reported at least one disability, including a mental health related disability, and indicated that they had registered for access services from their college. Seventy-four students without disabilities were included in some analyses. Our findings reveal emerging issues such as non-binary gender and multiple comorbidities, in addition to more targeted recommendations concerning technology use. For example, over half of our sample self-reported multiple disabilities; there is a large number of students with mental health related disabilities (e.g., anxiety disorders, mood disorders), many of whom have comorbid disabilities; binary (male, female) gender designations are outdated; and exam and classroom accommodations without technologies are still the most popular. Grades of students with and without disabilities did not differ. Similarly, the number of different types of accommodations in two- and four-year colleges did not differ. Students generally had high technology related self-efficacy and they saw the substantial benefit of technologies, especially of writing tools. Students with mental health related disability used somewhat fewer technologies for reading, writing and time management. Self-efficacy and perceived benefit were highest for writing technologies. General use technologies such as Microsoft Office and Google Docs that were reported by most students in this study are increasingly used as adaptive aids. In future, use of technology related accommodations is likely to include showing students how to use general use software.","PeriodicalId":89971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education and training studies","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twenty Years Into the 21st Century – Tech-related Accommodations for College Students with Mental Health and Other Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"C. Fichten, Alice Havel, M. Jorgensen, Susie Wileman, J. Budd\",\"doi\":\"10.11114/jets.v10i4.5594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtually all North American two- and four-year colleges provide accommodations to their increasing numbers of students with disabilities. To explore technology and non-technology related accommodations for these students we surveyed 118 Canadian two- and four-year college students who self-reported at least one disability, including a mental health related disability, and indicated that they had registered for access services from their college. Seventy-four students without disabilities were included in some analyses. Our findings reveal emerging issues such as non-binary gender and multiple comorbidities, in addition to more targeted recommendations concerning technology use. For example, over half of our sample self-reported multiple disabilities; there is a large number of students with mental health related disabilities (e.g., anxiety disorders, mood disorders), many of whom have comorbid disabilities; binary (male, female) gender designations are outdated; and exam and classroom accommodations without technologies are still the most popular. Grades of students with and without disabilities did not differ. Similarly, the number of different types of accommodations in two- and four-year colleges did not differ. Students generally had high technology related self-efficacy and they saw the substantial benefit of technologies, especially of writing tools. Students with mental health related disability used somewhat fewer technologies for reading, writing and time management. Self-efficacy and perceived benefit were highest for writing technologies. General use technologies such as Microsoft Office and Google Docs that were reported by most students in this study are increasingly used as adaptive aids. In future, use of technology related accommodations is likely to include showing students how to use general use software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of education and training studies\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of education and training studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v10i4.5594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education and training studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v10i4.5594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几乎所有的北美两年制和四年制大学都为越来越多的残疾学生提供住宿。为了探索这些学生的技术和非技术相关住宿,我们调查了118名加拿大二年制和四年制大学生,他们自我报告至少有一种残疾,包括与心理健康相关的残疾,并表示他们已经注册了学院的服务。74名无残疾学生被纳入一些分析。我们的研究结果揭示了新出现的问题,如非二元性别和多种合并症,以及关于技术使用的更有针对性的建议。例如,超过一半的样本自我报告有多重残疾;有大量学生患有与心理健康相关的残疾(如焦虑症、情绪障碍),其中许多人患有共病残疾;二元(男性、女性)性别名称已经过时;没有技术的考试和教室住宿仍然是最受欢迎的。残疾学生和非残疾学生的成绩没有差异。同样,两年制大学和四年制大学不同类型住宿的数量也没有差异。学生通常具有较高的技术相关自我效能感,他们看到了技术的实质性好处,尤其是写作工具。有心理健康相关残疾的学生在阅读、写作和时间管理方面使用的技术较少。写作技术的自我效能感和感知效益最高。本研究中大多数学生报告的微软办公软件和谷歌文档等通用技术越来越多地被用作自适应辅助工具。未来,与技术相关的便利设施的使用可能包括向学生展示如何使用通用软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Twenty Years Into the 21st Century – Tech-related Accommodations for College Students with Mental Health and Other Disabilities
Virtually all North American two- and four-year colleges provide accommodations to their increasing numbers of students with disabilities. To explore technology and non-technology related accommodations for these students we surveyed 118 Canadian two- and four-year college students who self-reported at least one disability, including a mental health related disability, and indicated that they had registered for access services from their college. Seventy-four students without disabilities were included in some analyses. Our findings reveal emerging issues such as non-binary gender and multiple comorbidities, in addition to more targeted recommendations concerning technology use. For example, over half of our sample self-reported multiple disabilities; there is a large number of students with mental health related disabilities (e.g., anxiety disorders, mood disorders), many of whom have comorbid disabilities; binary (male, female) gender designations are outdated; and exam and classroom accommodations without technologies are still the most popular. Grades of students with and without disabilities did not differ. Similarly, the number of different types of accommodations in two- and four-year colleges did not differ. Students generally had high technology related self-efficacy and they saw the substantial benefit of technologies, especially of writing tools. Students with mental health related disability used somewhat fewer technologies for reading, writing and time management. Self-efficacy and perceived benefit were highest for writing technologies. General use technologies such as Microsoft Office and Google Docs that were reported by most students in this study are increasingly used as adaptive aids. In future, use of technology related accommodations is likely to include showing students how to use general use software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信