右翼意识形态约束和疫苗拒绝:挪威的COVID - 19疫苗案例

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Scandinavian Political Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-14 DOI:10.1111/1467-9477.12224
Dag Wollebæk, Audun Fladmoe, Kari Steen-Johnsen, Øyvind Ihlen
{"title":"右翼意识形态约束和疫苗拒绝:挪威的COVID - 19疫苗案例","authors":"Dag Wollebæk, Audun Fladmoe, Kari Steen-Johnsen, Øyvind Ihlen","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has shown a correlation between votes for populist parties and the belief that vaccines are not important or effective. More recent investigations in the United States and France have similarly shown that attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine have been politicized. In this article, we show a similar pattern analyzing survey data from Norway, a country relatively mildly hit by the pandemic and characterized by high trust and a consensual political culture. We find that refusal to vaccinate is associated with right-wing ideological constraint, even when considering a wide array of control variables (e.g., lack of confidence, complacency), and sociodemographic characteristics. The results imply that vaccine refusal latch onto established political cleavages, particularly among the most ideologically consistent. Thus, polarization in the form of increasing ideological constraint may represent a mounting challenge for vaccine uptake, suggesting that vaccine communication should go beyond \"explaining the science\" and factor in ideology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51572,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Political Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right-wing ideological constraint and vaccine refusal: The case of the COVID-19 vaccine in Norway.\",\"authors\":\"Dag Wollebæk, Audun Fladmoe, Kari Steen-Johnsen, Øyvind Ihlen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9477.12224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research has shown a correlation between votes for populist parties and the belief that vaccines are not important or effective. More recent investigations in the United States and France have similarly shown that attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine have been politicized. In this article, we show a similar pattern analyzing survey data from Norway, a country relatively mildly hit by the pandemic and characterized by high trust and a consensual political culture. We find that refusal to vaccinate is associated with right-wing ideological constraint, even when considering a wide array of control variables (e.g., lack of confidence, complacency), and sociodemographic characteristics. The results imply that vaccine refusal latch onto established political cleavages, particularly among the most ideologically consistent. Thus, polarization in the form of increasing ideological constraint may represent a mounting challenge for vaccine uptake, suggesting that vaccine communication should go beyond \\\"explaining the science\\\" and factor in ideology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Political Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Political Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12224\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要研究表明,民粹主义政党的选票与疫苗不重要或无效的信念之间存在相关性。美国和法国最近的调查同样表明,人们对新冠肺炎疫苗的态度已被政治化。在这篇文章中,我们对挪威的调查数据进行了类似的分析,挪威是一个受疫情影响相对较轻的国家,其特点是高度信任和协商一致的政治文化。我们发现,拒绝接种疫苗与右翼意识形态约束有关,即使考虑到一系列控制变量(如缺乏信心、自满)和社会人口特征。结果表明,拒绝接种疫苗与既定的政治分歧有关,尤其是在意识形态最一致的人群中。因此,意识形态约束加剧形式的两极分化可能对疫苗接种构成越来越大的挑战,这表明疫苗传播应该超越“解释科学”和意识形态因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right-wing ideological constraint and vaccine refusal: The case of the COVID-19 vaccine in Norway.

Research has shown a correlation between votes for populist parties and the belief that vaccines are not important or effective. More recent investigations in the United States and France have similarly shown that attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine have been politicized. In this article, we show a similar pattern analyzing survey data from Norway, a country relatively mildly hit by the pandemic and characterized by high trust and a consensual political culture. We find that refusal to vaccinate is associated with right-wing ideological constraint, even when considering a wide array of control variables (e.g., lack of confidence, complacency), and sociodemographic characteristics. The results imply that vaccine refusal latch onto established political cleavages, particularly among the most ideologically consistent. Thus, polarization in the form of increasing ideological constraint may represent a mounting challenge for vaccine uptake, suggesting that vaccine communication should go beyond "explaining the science" and factor in ideology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Political Studies
Scandinavian Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Political Studies is the only English language political science journal from Scandinavia. The journal publishes widely on policy and electoral issues affecting the Scandinavian countries, and sets those issues in European and global context. Scandinavian Political Studies is an indispensable source for all those researching and teaching in Scandinavian political science, public policy and electoral analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信