TEPS部分成绩和总分的可靠性

Euijin Lim
{"title":"TEPS部分成绩和总分的可靠性","authors":"Euijin Lim","doi":"10.30961/lr.2019.55.s.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the current study is to investigate the reliability and stability of the section and total (composite) scores of TEPS from the classical test theory perspectives. For reliability analyses, multiple sets of data were collected not only from the operational TEPS administrations before and after the revision but also from the four pilot tests administered during the TEPS revision process. Cronbach’s (1951) alpha coefficients were computed for four different section scores of the tests while Feldt and Brennan’s (1989) composite score reliability coefficients were computed for the total scores of these tests. These coefficients are examined and compared across different test forms of the original and revised TEPS. Coefficients of equivalence and stability and correlation coefficients between forms before and after the revision were also examined to see how stable TEPS scores were. The results showed that TEPS section scores and the total score were reliable and that the changes introduced by the revision did not reduce the stability. The total score had high reliability above 0.9 indicating that TEPS can be used as a dependable indicator of Korean English language learners’ English proficiency to inform language-related, decision-making.","PeriodicalId":89433,"journal":{"name":"Language research","volume":"140 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of TEPS Section Scores and the Total Score\",\"authors\":\"Euijin Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.30961/lr.2019.55.s.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the current study is to investigate the reliability and stability of the section and total (composite) scores of TEPS from the classical test theory perspectives. For reliability analyses, multiple sets of data were collected not only from the operational TEPS administrations before and after the revision but also from the four pilot tests administered during the TEPS revision process. Cronbach’s (1951) alpha coefficients were computed for four different section scores of the tests while Feldt and Brennan’s (1989) composite score reliability coefficients were computed for the total scores of these tests. These coefficients are examined and compared across different test forms of the original and revised TEPS. Coefficients of equivalence and stability and correlation coefficients between forms before and after the revision were also examined to see how stable TEPS scores were. The results showed that TEPS section scores and the total score were reliable and that the changes introduced by the revision did not reduce the stability. The total score had high reliability above 0.9 indicating that TEPS can be used as a dependable indicator of Korean English language learners’ English proficiency to inform language-related, decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language research\",\"volume\":\"140 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2019.55.s.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2019.55.s.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是从经典测试理论的角度研究TEPS的截面和总分(综合)的可靠性和稳定性。对于可靠性分析,不仅从修订前后的TEPS运营管理部门收集了多组数据,还从TEPS修订过程中进行的四次试点测试中收集了多套数据。Cronbach(1951)的α系数是为四个不同的测试部分得分计算的,而Feldt和Brennan(1989)的综合得分可靠性系数是为这些测试的总分计算的。这些系数在原始和修订TEPS的不同测试形式中进行了检查和比较。还检查了修订前后表格之间的等效系数和稳定性系数以及相关系数,以了解TEPS分数的稳定性。结果表明,TEPS剖面评分和总分是可靠的,修订引入的变化并没有降低稳定性。总分在0.9以上具有较高的可靠性,表明TEPS可以作为韩国英语学习者英语水平的可靠指标,为语言相关决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of TEPS Section Scores and the Total Score
The purpose of the current study is to investigate the reliability and stability of the section and total (composite) scores of TEPS from the classical test theory perspectives. For reliability analyses, multiple sets of data were collected not only from the operational TEPS administrations before and after the revision but also from the four pilot tests administered during the TEPS revision process. Cronbach’s (1951) alpha coefficients were computed for four different section scores of the tests while Feldt and Brennan’s (1989) composite score reliability coefficients were computed for the total scores of these tests. These coefficients are examined and compared across different test forms of the original and revised TEPS. Coefficients of equivalence and stability and correlation coefficients between forms before and after the revision were also examined to see how stable TEPS scores were. The results showed that TEPS section scores and the total score were reliable and that the changes introduced by the revision did not reduce the stability. The total score had high reliability above 0.9 indicating that TEPS can be used as a dependable indicator of Korean English language learners’ English proficiency to inform language-related, decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信