加速印度尼西亚土地登记:从马来西亚土地登记问题中吸取的经验教训

Q3 Social Sciences
Ricco Survival Yubaidi, Mazliza Mohamad, Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz
{"title":"加速印度尼西亚土地登记:从马来西亚土地登记问题中吸取的经验教训","authors":"Ricco Survival Yubaidi, Mazliza Mohamad, Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every country has its land policy system. Indonesia employs deeds registration which refers to the Basic Agrarian Law (BAL) and Malaysia uses a title registration system called the National Land Code (NLC). Indonesia has yet to complete its land registration mandate throughout the country since the mandate was officially introduced in the BAL 1960. While Malaysia has adopted a Torrens system concerning land matters, recognising that land registration is everything. The first part of the paper focuses on beneficial ownership, confidential land ownership data, identifying land registration constraints and strengthening land administration abilities, while the second part focuses on land registration as a legal instrument and land rights ownership affirmation. The main question in this research is to analyse whether the quantity, quality and legal certainty guarantees of land registration are strongly influenced by a well-organised land registration system. Indonesia and Malaysia are still addressing weaknesses in their respective land registration systems based on issues. There is a need for improvement of roles from two main stakeholders, namely the government’s role in streamlining administration and the role of community participation in supporting successful land registration. This paper will also provide recommendations for academicians, government/institutional leaders, and legislators to assess and continuously strengthen the BAL as the fundamental principle of land law in Indonesia, especially in its land registration system and legal certainty over land registration.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"1169 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LAND REGISTRATION ACCELERATION IN INDONESIA: A LESSON-LEARNED GUIDELINE FROM LAND REGISTRATION ISSUES IN MALAYSIA\",\"authors\":\"Ricco Survival Yubaidi, Mazliza Mohamad, Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Every country has its land policy system. Indonesia employs deeds registration which refers to the Basic Agrarian Law (BAL) and Malaysia uses a title registration system called the National Land Code (NLC). Indonesia has yet to complete its land registration mandate throughout the country since the mandate was officially introduced in the BAL 1960. While Malaysia has adopted a Torrens system concerning land matters, recognising that land registration is everything. The first part of the paper focuses on beneficial ownership, confidential land ownership data, identifying land registration constraints and strengthening land administration abilities, while the second part focuses on land registration as a legal instrument and land rights ownership affirmation. The main question in this research is to analyse whether the quantity, quality and legal certainty guarantees of land registration are strongly influenced by a well-organised land registration system. Indonesia and Malaysia are still addressing weaknesses in their respective land registration systems based on issues. There is a need for improvement of roles from two main stakeholders, namely the government’s role in streamlining administration and the role of community participation in supporting successful land registration. This paper will also provide recommendations for academicians, government/institutional leaders, and legislators to assess and continuously strengthen the BAL as the fundamental principle of land law in Indonesia, especially in its land registration system and legal certainty over land registration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"1169 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

每个国家都有自己的土地政策体系。印度尼西亚根据《土地基本法》(BAL)进行契约登记,马来西亚采用名为《国家土地法》(NLC)的产权登记制度。自1960年BAL正式引入该授权以来,印度尼西亚尚未完成其在全国各地的土地登记授权。虽然马来西亚在土地事务方面采用了托伦斯制度,承认土地登记就是一切。论文的第一部分重点讨论了受益所有制、土地所有权数据保密、识别土地登记约束和加强土地管理能力,而第二部分则重点讨论了土地登记作为一种法律工具和土地权利所有权的确认。本研究的主要问题是分析土地登记的数量、质量和法律确定性保障是否受到组织良好的土地登记制度的强烈影响。印度尼西亚和马来西亚仍在根据问题解决各自土地登记制度的薄弱环节。两个主要利益攸关方的角色需要改进,即政府在精简行政方面的角色和社区参与在支持土地登记成功方面的角色。本文还将为院士、政府/机构领导人和立法者提供建议,以评估并不断加强BAL作为印度尼西亚土地法的基本原则,特别是在其土地登记制度和土地登记的法律确定性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LAND REGISTRATION ACCELERATION IN INDONESIA: A LESSON-LEARNED GUIDELINE FROM LAND REGISTRATION ISSUES IN MALAYSIA
Every country has its land policy system. Indonesia employs deeds registration which refers to the Basic Agrarian Law (BAL) and Malaysia uses a title registration system called the National Land Code (NLC). Indonesia has yet to complete its land registration mandate throughout the country since the mandate was officially introduced in the BAL 1960. While Malaysia has adopted a Torrens system concerning land matters, recognising that land registration is everything. The first part of the paper focuses on beneficial ownership, confidential land ownership data, identifying land registration constraints and strengthening land administration abilities, while the second part focuses on land registration as a legal instrument and land rights ownership affirmation. The main question in this research is to analyse whether the quantity, quality and legal certainty guarantees of land registration are strongly influenced by a well-organised land registration system. Indonesia and Malaysia are still addressing weaknesses in their respective land registration systems based on issues. There is a need for improvement of roles from two main stakeholders, namely the government’s role in streamlining administration and the role of community participation in supporting successful land registration. This paper will also provide recommendations for academicians, government/institutional leaders, and legislators to assess and continuously strengthen the BAL as the fundamental principle of land law in Indonesia, especially in its land registration system and legal certainty over land registration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信