EFPIA关于医疗保健终身学习原则质量框架的指南

Eva Hofstädter-Thalmann, D. Largier
{"title":"EFPIA关于医疗保健终身学习原则质量框架的指南","authors":"Eva Hofstädter-Thalmann, D. Largier","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2022.2068216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor, Lifelong Learning (LL) is defined by the European Commission as all learning activity undertaken throughout life, with the aim of improving knowledge, skills and competences[1]. For healthcare professionals LL is essential for the provision of an optimal standard of patient care. Lifelong Learning in Healthcare (LLH) in Europe includes a variety of educational forms, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) including Independent Medical Education (IME), with or without formal accreditation, as well as non-accredited medical education activities offered by a variety of education providers and according to different national regulations. Some activities are either lead or funded by the pharmaceutical industry. This involvement of industry in medical education has been described in a detailed analysis[2]. The pharmaceutical industry has a longstanding commitment to engaging and innovating in LLH, partly to provide evidence to ensure its innovations are used safely and in the appropriate patient populations, but also due to its large geographical footprint to support or provide learning opportunities for healthcare professionals (HCPs) in countries with relatively limited access to LLH offerings. In addition, the pharmaceutical industry is frequently at the forefront of clinical research in association with academic investigators and supports the translation of scientific advancements into clinical practice. As the approach to LLH was not fully aligned across the pharmaceutical industry, and to ensure that the quality and conduct of industry funded or led LLH activities are appropriate, Article 16 of the EFPIA Code was published to ensure that LLH activities are distinct from promotional activities [3]. In addition EFPIA created a working group of industry specialists, and representatives from national associations who have produced a guideline for member companies to align on quality criteria[4]. Furthermore, to ensure a broadly-based input into the LLH quality guideline, external stakeholders, representing medical societies, academia, healthcare professionals, and patient organisations were invited to provide feedback on the industry LLH guideline during an Advisory Round Table meeting in 2020. The principles of ethical, transparent and responsible engagement, quality content and robust processes incorporated in the guideline have been well accepted also by other organisations[5] and are regarded as having relevance to all learning activities. By ensuring promotional activities are separate from LLH and introducing the quality guideline for EFPIA member funded or led LLH activities, it is expected that the greater transparency of industry LLH activities will ensure an aligned quality approach. The purpose of this recently published document is to provide further guidance for industry for the implementation of Article 16 of the EFPIA Code. The guideline must be read with the requirements and spirit of the Code in mind and applied in accordance with applicable country laws and regulations.","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"158 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFPIA Guideline on a Quality Framework of Principles in Lifelong Learning in Healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Eva Hofstädter-Thalmann, D. Largier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21614083.2022.2068216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To the Editor, Lifelong Learning (LL) is defined by the European Commission as all learning activity undertaken throughout life, with the aim of improving knowledge, skills and competences[1]. For healthcare professionals LL is essential for the provision of an optimal standard of patient care. Lifelong Learning in Healthcare (LLH) in Europe includes a variety of educational forms, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) including Independent Medical Education (IME), with or without formal accreditation, as well as non-accredited medical education activities offered by a variety of education providers and according to different national regulations. Some activities are either lead or funded by the pharmaceutical industry. This involvement of industry in medical education has been described in a detailed analysis[2]. The pharmaceutical industry has a longstanding commitment to engaging and innovating in LLH, partly to provide evidence to ensure its innovations are used safely and in the appropriate patient populations, but also due to its large geographical footprint to support or provide learning opportunities for healthcare professionals (HCPs) in countries with relatively limited access to LLH offerings. In addition, the pharmaceutical industry is frequently at the forefront of clinical research in association with academic investigators and supports the translation of scientific advancements into clinical practice. As the approach to LLH was not fully aligned across the pharmaceutical industry, and to ensure that the quality and conduct of industry funded or led LLH activities are appropriate, Article 16 of the EFPIA Code was published to ensure that LLH activities are distinct from promotional activities [3]. In addition EFPIA created a working group of industry specialists, and representatives from national associations who have produced a guideline for member companies to align on quality criteria[4]. Furthermore, to ensure a broadly-based input into the LLH quality guideline, external stakeholders, representing medical societies, academia, healthcare professionals, and patient organisations were invited to provide feedback on the industry LLH guideline during an Advisory Round Table meeting in 2020. The principles of ethical, transparent and responsible engagement, quality content and robust processes incorporated in the guideline have been well accepted also by other organisations[5] and are regarded as having relevance to all learning activities. By ensuring promotional activities are separate from LLH and introducing the quality guideline for EFPIA member funded or led LLH activities, it is expected that the greater transparency of industry LLH activities will ensure an aligned quality approach. The purpose of this recently published document is to provide further guidance for industry for the implementation of Article 16 of the EFPIA Code. The guideline must be read with the requirements and spirit of the Code in mind and applied in accordance with applicable country laws and regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European CME\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European CME\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2022.2068216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2022.2068216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

编者认为,终身学习(LL)由欧盟委员会定义为一生中进行的所有学习活动,目的是提高知识、技能和能力[1]。对于医疗保健专业人员来说,LL对于提供最佳标准的患者护理至关重要。欧洲的医疗保健终身学习(LLH)包括各种教育形式、包括独立医学教育(IME)在内的持续专业发展(CPD),无论是否获得正式认证,以及由各种教育提供者根据不同的国家法规提供的未经认证的医学教育活动。有些活动由制药行业牵头或资助。工业界对医学教育的参与已经在详细的分析中进行了描述[2]。制药行业长期致力于LLH的参与和创新,部分原因是为了提供证据,确保其创新在适当的患者群体中安全使用,但也由于其庞大的地理足迹,可以支持或为获得LLH产品相对有限的国家的医疗专业人员提供学习机会。此外,制药行业经常与学术研究人员一起处于临床研究的前沿,并支持将科学进步转化为临床实践。由于整个制药行业的LLH方法并不完全一致,为了确保行业资助或领导的LLH活动的质量和行为是适当的,发布了《EFPIA准则》第16条,以确保LLH活动与促销活动不同[3]。此外,EFPIA成立了一个由行业专家和国家协会代表组成的工作组,他们为成员公司制定了质量标准一致的指导方针[4]。此外,为了确保LLH质量指南得到广泛的输入,代表医学会、学术界、医疗保健专业人员和患者组织的外部利益相关者被邀请在2020年的咨询圆桌会议上就行业LLH指南提供反馈。准则中包含的道德、透明和负责任的参与、高质量的内容和稳健的流程原则也被其他组织所接受[5],并被视为与所有学习活动相关。通过确保促销活动与LLH分开,并为EFPIA成员资助或领导的LLH活动引入质量指南,预计行业LLH活动的更大透明度将确保一致的质量方法。本最近发布的文件旨在为行业实施《EFPIA准则》第16条提供进一步指导。阅读指南时必须牢记《准则》的要求和精神,并根据适用的国家法律法规进行应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFPIA Guideline on a Quality Framework of Principles in Lifelong Learning in Healthcare
To the Editor, Lifelong Learning (LL) is defined by the European Commission as all learning activity undertaken throughout life, with the aim of improving knowledge, skills and competences[1]. For healthcare professionals LL is essential for the provision of an optimal standard of patient care. Lifelong Learning in Healthcare (LLH) in Europe includes a variety of educational forms, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) including Independent Medical Education (IME), with or without formal accreditation, as well as non-accredited medical education activities offered by a variety of education providers and according to different national regulations. Some activities are either lead or funded by the pharmaceutical industry. This involvement of industry in medical education has been described in a detailed analysis[2]. The pharmaceutical industry has a longstanding commitment to engaging and innovating in LLH, partly to provide evidence to ensure its innovations are used safely and in the appropriate patient populations, but also due to its large geographical footprint to support or provide learning opportunities for healthcare professionals (HCPs) in countries with relatively limited access to LLH offerings. In addition, the pharmaceutical industry is frequently at the forefront of clinical research in association with academic investigators and supports the translation of scientific advancements into clinical practice. As the approach to LLH was not fully aligned across the pharmaceutical industry, and to ensure that the quality and conduct of industry funded or led LLH activities are appropriate, Article 16 of the EFPIA Code was published to ensure that LLH activities are distinct from promotional activities [3]. In addition EFPIA created a working group of industry specialists, and representatives from national associations who have produced a guideline for member companies to align on quality criteria[4]. Furthermore, to ensure a broadly-based input into the LLH quality guideline, external stakeholders, representing medical societies, academia, healthcare professionals, and patient organisations were invited to provide feedback on the industry LLH guideline during an Advisory Round Table meeting in 2020. The principles of ethical, transparent and responsible engagement, quality content and robust processes incorporated in the guideline have been well accepted also by other organisations[5] and are regarded as having relevance to all learning activities. By ensuring promotional activities are separate from LLH and introducing the quality guideline for EFPIA member funded or led LLH activities, it is expected that the greater transparency of industry LLH activities will ensure an aligned quality approach. The purpose of this recently published document is to provide further guidance for industry for the implementation of Article 16 of the EFPIA Code. The guideline must be read with the requirements and spirit of the Code in mind and applied in accordance with applicable country laws and regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信