极早产儿围产期管理的叙述性综述:证据是什么?

W. Tang, Ting-zhao Gao, Yun Cao, Wenhao Zhou, Dongli Song, Laishuan Wang
{"title":"极早产儿围产期管理的叙述性综述:证据是什么?","authors":"W. Tang, Ting-zhao Gao, Yun Cao, Wenhao Zhou, Dongli Song, Laishuan Wang","doi":"10.21037/pm-21-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To review the current evidence for management strategies applied during perinatal period to improve the short- and long- term outcomes in extremely preterm infants (EPIs). Background: EPIs are defined as infants born before 28 completed weeks of gestation. Due to extreme prematurity, a large number of EPIs are at increased risk for both mortality and morbidity. Although significant advances have been made in neonatal and perinatal medicine, the management of EPIs remains a great challenge to families, physicians, and the entire health care system. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies regarding perinatal management of EPIs from 2000 to 2021. Observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. The title and abstract of each article were screened for the selection of relevant articles. Conclusions: Numerous proactive interventions need to be implemented during this critical perinatal period so that the mortality and impairment rates of these vulnerable infants can be minimized. The effectiveness and safety of some interventions have been widely studied in large meta-analyses or RCTs. Meanwhile, a lot of novel management strategies are under investigation and many already have promising early results. However, the long-term effects of some intervention efforts remain limited. The answers of some important questions in the care practice of EPIs remain unsatisfying. 21","PeriodicalId":74411,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":"1 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narrative review of perinatal management of extremely preterm infants: what’s the evidence?\",\"authors\":\"W. Tang, Ting-zhao Gao, Yun Cao, Wenhao Zhou, Dongli Song, Laishuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/pm-21-51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To review the current evidence for management strategies applied during perinatal period to improve the short- and long- term outcomes in extremely preterm infants (EPIs). Background: EPIs are defined as infants born before 28 completed weeks of gestation. Due to extreme prematurity, a large number of EPIs are at increased risk for both mortality and morbidity. Although significant advances have been made in neonatal and perinatal medicine, the management of EPIs remains a great challenge to families, physicians, and the entire health care system. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies regarding perinatal management of EPIs from 2000 to 2021. Observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. The title and abstract of each article were screened for the selection of relevant articles. Conclusions: Numerous proactive interventions need to be implemented during this critical perinatal period so that the mortality and impairment rates of these vulnerable infants can be minimized. The effectiveness and safety of some interventions have been widely studied in large meta-analyses or RCTs. Meanwhile, a lot of novel management strategies are under investigation and many already have promising early results. However, the long-term effects of some intervention efforts remain limited. The answers of some important questions in the care practice of EPIs remain unsatisfying. 21\",\"PeriodicalId\":74411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"volume\":\"1 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:回顾目前的证据,围生期管理策略的应用,以改善极早产儿(EPIs)的短期和长期结局。背景:EPIs被定义为妊娠28周前出生的婴儿。由于极度早产,大量计划生育儿童的死亡率和发病率都有增加的风险。尽管在新生儿和围产期医学方面取得了重大进展,但EPIs的管理仍然是家庭、医生和整个卫生保健系统面临的巨大挑战。方法:在PubMed、Cochrane Library、OVID、Embase和Web of Science中检索2000 - 2021年EPIs围产期管理的相关文献。包括观察性研究、随机对照试验(rct)、系统评价和荟萃分析。筛选每篇文章的标题和摘要,选择相关文章。结论:在这个关键的围产期,需要实施许多积极的干预措施,以尽量减少这些易感婴儿的死亡率和损伤率。一些干预措施的有效性和安全性已在大型荟萃分析或随机对照试验中得到广泛研究。与此同时,许多新的管理策略正在研究中,其中许多已经取得了可喜的初步成果。然而,一些干预措施的长期效果仍然有限。在EPIs的护理实践中,一些重要问题的答案仍不令人满意。21
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Narrative review of perinatal management of extremely preterm infants: what’s the evidence?
Objective: To review the current evidence for management strategies applied during perinatal period to improve the short- and long- term outcomes in extremely preterm infants (EPIs). Background: EPIs are defined as infants born before 28 completed weeks of gestation. Due to extreme prematurity, a large number of EPIs are at increased risk for both mortality and morbidity. Although significant advances have been made in neonatal and perinatal medicine, the management of EPIs remains a great challenge to families, physicians, and the entire health care system. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies regarding perinatal management of EPIs from 2000 to 2021. Observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. The title and abstract of each article were screened for the selection of relevant articles. Conclusions: Numerous proactive interventions need to be implemented during this critical perinatal period so that the mortality and impairment rates of these vulnerable infants can be minimized. The effectiveness and safety of some interventions have been widely studied in large meta-analyses or RCTs. Meanwhile, a lot of novel management strategies are under investigation and many already have promising early results. However, the long-term effects of some intervention efforts remain limited. The answers of some important questions in the care practice of EPIs remain unsatisfying. 21
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信