有争议的概念:日本的国际化和多元文化共存——特别关注民族教室

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Bettina Gildenhard
{"title":"有争议的概念:日本的国际化和多元文化共存——特别关注民族教室","authors":"Bettina Gildenhard","doi":"10.1080/09555803.2021.1899267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The terms internationalisation and multicultural coexistence are used by a variety of actors. Depending on their respective position in society, they endow these terms with different meanings. The article aims to show how these meanings are contested and negotiated. The examination combines discourse analysis with insights into practice gained through participant observation and in-depth interviews. By focusing on the micro level and the issue of ethnic classrooms in Osaka it will become clear that multicultural coexistence, though often criticised as an anodyne catchphrase, has the potential to promote the right to ethnic education.","PeriodicalId":44495,"journal":{"name":"Japan Forum","volume":"31 9‐10","pages":"200 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09555803.2021.1899267","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contested concepts: internationalisation and multicultural coexistence in Japan – with special focus on ethnic classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Bettina Gildenhard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09555803.2021.1899267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The terms internationalisation and multicultural coexistence are used by a variety of actors. Depending on their respective position in society, they endow these terms with different meanings. The article aims to show how these meanings are contested and negotiated. The examination combines discourse analysis with insights into practice gained through participant observation and in-depth interviews. By focusing on the micro level and the issue of ethnic classrooms in Osaka it will become clear that multicultural coexistence, though often criticised as an anodyne catchphrase, has the potential to promote the right to ethnic education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan Forum\",\"volume\":\"31 9‐10\",\"pages\":\"200 - 220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09555803.2021.1899267\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2021.1899267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2021.1899267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际化和多元文化共存这两个术语被各种行动者所使用。根据他们各自的社会地位,他们赋予这些术语不同的含义。本文旨在展示这些含义是如何被争论和协商的。考试将话语分析与通过参与观察和深度访谈获得的实践见解相结合。通过关注微观层面和大阪的民族课堂问题,我们将清楚地认识到,尽管多元文化共存经常被批评为一种止痛的口号,但它有可能促进民族教育权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contested concepts: internationalisation and multicultural coexistence in Japan – with special focus on ethnic classrooms
Abstract The terms internationalisation and multicultural coexistence are used by a variety of actors. Depending on their respective position in society, they endow these terms with different meanings. The article aims to show how these meanings are contested and negotiated. The examination combines discourse analysis with insights into practice gained through participant observation and in-depth interviews. By focusing on the micro level and the issue of ethnic classrooms in Osaka it will become clear that multicultural coexistence, though often criticised as an anodyne catchphrase, has the potential to promote the right to ethnic education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japan Forum
Japan Forum AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信