Neology vs.激进启蒙：Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart、Jakob Mauvillon和Frederick关于自爱作为道德原则的伟大文章（1770）

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN

Publications of the English Goethe Society Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063

Kevin Hilliard

{"title":"Neology vs.激进启蒙：Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart、Jakob Mauvillon和Frederick关于自爱作为道德原则的伟大文章（1770）","authors":"Kevin Hilliard","doi":"10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article discusses a pirated translation and edition of a work by the German theologian Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart (1738–1809) and shows that it can be attributed to Jakob Mauvillon (1743–1794), an important figure of the late Radical Enlightenment in Germany. In this Examen des motifs à la vertu (1774) Mauvillon submerges the primary text in a flood of commentary, with the aim of discrediting Steinbart’s claims. Steinbart’s work was itself a response to a treatise by Frederick II of Prussia (1712–1786). Mauvillon’s intervention was intended to warn against the alliance between church and state that he saw emerging in Frederick’s treatise and Steinbart’s response","PeriodicalId":40789,"journal":{"name":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neology vs. Radical Enlightenment: Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart, Jakob Mauvillon, and Frederick the Great’s Essai sur l’Amour-propre envisagé comme Principe de Morale (1770)\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Hilliard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article discusses a pirated translation and edition of a work by the German theologian Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart (1738–1809) and shows that it can be attributed to Jakob Mauvillon (1743–1794), an important figure of the late Radical Enlightenment in Germany. In this Examen des motifs à la vertu (1774) Mauvillon submerges the primary text in a flood of commentary, with the aim of discrediting Steinbart’s claims. Steinbart’s work was itself a response to a treatise by Frederick II of Prussia (1712–1786). Mauvillon’s intervention was intended to warn against the alliance between church and state that he saw emerging in Frederick’s treatise and Steinbart’s response\",\"PeriodicalId\":40789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了德国神学家施泰因巴特(1738-1809)的一部作品的盗版翻译，并指出该作品的作者是德国激进启蒙运动后期的重要人物雅各布·莫维隆(1743-1794)。在这本《动机的检验》(Examen des motifs la vertu, 1774)中，莫维龙将主要文本淹没在大量评论中，目的是质疑斯坦巴特的主张。施泰因巴特的工作本身就是对普鲁士的腓特烈二世(1712-1786)的一篇论文的回应。莫维隆的干预是为了警告教会和国家之间的联盟，他在腓特烈的论文和斯坦巴特的回应中看到了这一点

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Neology vs. Radical Enlightenment: Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart, Jakob Mauvillon, and Frederick the Great’s Essai sur l’Amour-propre envisagé comme Principe de Morale (1770)

ABSTRACT This article discusses a pirated translation and edition of a work by the German theologian Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart (1738–1809) and shows that it can be attributed to Jakob Mauvillon (1743–1794), an important figure of the late Radical Enlightenment in Germany. In this Examen des motifs à la vertu (1774) Mauvillon submerges the primary text in a flood of commentary, with the aim of discrediting Steinbart’s claims. Steinbart’s work was itself a response to a treatise by Frederick II of Prussia (1712–1786). Mauvillon’s intervention was intended to warn against the alliance between church and state that he saw emerging in Frederick’s treatise and Steinbart’s response

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Publications of the English Goethe Society LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量