PageRank模型在奥运女子跆拳道排名中的应用:PageRank与积分指标体系的比较

IF 0.8 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Annals of Applied Sport Science Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.52547/aassjournal.971

Heyri Oh, minsoo Jeon, Seungtae Chin, Hyosung Lim

{"title":"PageRank模型在奥运女子跆拳道排名中的应用:PageRank与积分指标体系的比较","authors":"Heyri Oh, minsoo Jeon, Seungtae Chin, Hyosung Lim","doi":"10.52547/aassjournal.971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Although the World Taekwondo federation currently applies the APIS ranking method to calculate the Olympic rankings, some limitations exist. Objectives. This study applies the PageRank model to Olympics Taekwondo rankings. Methods. The 2015-2018 World Taekwondo Grand Prix competition results for women’s four weight classes (-49kg, -57kg, -67kg, +67kg) were used as research data, totaling 624 games. Excel and NetMiner programs were used to calculate the PageRank value, and the damping factor d was set to 0.15. Results. Player of People’s Republic of China (CHN), WU, and JINGYU, was ranked as No. 1 in the case of -46kg Olympic women’s weight class, and KIM, SO-HUI, player of Korea(KOR), and WONGPATTANKAKIT, PANIPAK, player of Thailand (THA), were ranked second. At -57kg, Great Britain (GBR) ’s JONES, and JADE was ranked 1st, Turkey (TUR) ’s TARTAR, Nauru (NRU) (2nd and Latvia (LAT) ’s TARVIDA, INESE the 3rd. At -67kg, Lvory Coast (CIV) ’s GBAGBI, RUTH was ranked 1st, KOR’s OH, HYERI player, and TUR’s TATAR, NUR. In the +67kg, CHN’s ZHENG, SHUYIN ranked number 1, GBR’s WALKDEN, BIANKA ranked second, and Poland (POL) ’s KOWALCZUK, AKEKSANDRA ranked third. Second, as a result of comparing the validity of the PageRank model and the APIS model, the validity of the PageRank model was relatively higher in all four weight classes. Conclusion. The page ranking method was found to be more valid for measuring the ranking in Taekwondo competitions than the current APIS system, which we believe the page ranking method is suitable for measuring rankings in various sports events other than Taekwondo.","PeriodicalId":43187,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Sport Science","volume":"59 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of PageRank Model for Olympic Women�s Taekwondo Rankings: Comparison of PageRank and Accumulated Point Index System\",\"authors\":\"Heyri Oh, minsoo Jeon, Seungtae Chin, Hyosung Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/aassjournal.971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Although the World Taekwondo federation currently applies the APIS ranking method to calculate the Olympic rankings, some limitations exist. Objectives. This study applies the PageRank model to Olympics Taekwondo rankings. Methods. The 2015-2018 World Taekwondo Grand Prix competition results for women’s four weight classes (-49kg, -57kg, -67kg, +67kg) were used as research data, totaling 624 games. Excel and NetMiner programs were used to calculate the PageRank value, and the damping factor d was set to 0.15. Results. Player of People’s Republic of China (CHN), WU, and JINGYU, was ranked as No. 1 in the case of -46kg Olympic women’s weight class, and KIM, SO-HUI, player of Korea(KOR), and WONGPATTANKAKIT, PANIPAK, player of Thailand (THA), were ranked second. At -57kg, Great Britain (GBR) ’s JONES, and JADE was ranked 1st, Turkey (TUR) ’s TARTAR, Nauru (NRU) (2nd and Latvia (LAT) ’s TARVIDA, INESE the 3rd. At -67kg, Lvory Coast (CIV) ’s GBAGBI, RUTH was ranked 1st, KOR’s OH, HYERI player, and TUR’s TATAR, NUR. In the +67kg, CHN’s ZHENG, SHUYIN ranked number 1, GBR’s WALKDEN, BIANKA ranked second, and Poland (POL) ’s KOWALCZUK, AKEKSANDRA ranked third. Second, as a result of comparing the validity of the PageRank model and the APIS model, the validity of the PageRank model was relatively higher in all four weight classes. Conclusion. The page ranking method was found to be more valid for measuring the ranking in Taekwondo competitions than the current APIS system, which we believe the page ranking method is suitable for measuring rankings in various sports events other than Taekwondo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Applied Sport Science\",\"volume\":\"59 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Applied Sport Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/aassjournal.971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/aassjournal.971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。虽然目前世界跆拳道联合会采用APIS排名法来计算奥运会排名，但仍存在一些局限性。目标。本研究将PageRank模型应用于奥运会跆拳道排名。方法。以2015-2018年世界跆拳道大奖赛女子4个级别(-49公斤级、-57公斤级、-67公斤级、+67公斤级)比赛成绩为研究数据，共计624场比赛。使用Excel和NetMiner程序计算PageRank值，将阻尼因子d设置为0.15。结果。在奥运会女子体重-46公斤级项目中，中华人民共和国选手吴敬宇和JINGYU名列第一，韩国选手金素慧和泰国选手WONGPATTANKAKIT名列第二。在-57公斤级，英国(GBR)的琼斯和杰德排名第一，土耳其(TUR)的塔塔尔，瑙鲁(NRU)(第二)和拉脱维亚(LAT)的塔维达，内斯(第三)。在-67公斤级，象牙海岸(文明)的GBAGBI, RUTH排名第一，KOR的OH, HYERI选手，turr的鞑靼，NUR。在+67公斤级比赛中，中国选手郑淑音排名第一，德国选手沃克登、比安卡排名第二，波兰选手科瓦尔丘克、阿克桑德拉排名第三。其次，通过比较PageRank模型和api模型的有效性，PageRank模型在四个权重类别中的有效性都相对较高。结论。我们发现页面排名法在衡量跆拳道比赛排名方面比现有的api系统更有效，我们认为页面排名法适用于衡量除跆拳道以外的各种体育项目的排名。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Application of PageRank Model for Olympic Women�s Taekwondo Rankings: Comparison of PageRank and Accumulated Point Index System

Background. Although the World Taekwondo federation currently applies the APIS ranking method to calculate the Olympic rankings, some limitations exist. Objectives. This study applies the PageRank model to Olympics Taekwondo rankings. Methods. The 2015-2018 World Taekwondo Grand Prix competition results for women’s four weight classes (-49kg, -57kg, -67kg, +67kg) were used as research data, totaling 624 games. Excel and NetMiner programs were used to calculate the PageRank value, and the damping factor d was set to 0.15. Results. Player of People’s Republic of China (CHN), WU, and JINGYU, was ranked as No. 1 in the case of -46kg Olympic women’s weight class, and KIM, SO-HUI, player of Korea(KOR), and WONGPATTANKAKIT, PANIPAK, player of Thailand (THA), were ranked second. At -57kg, Great Britain (GBR) ’s JONES, and JADE was ranked 1st, Turkey (TUR) ’s TARTAR, Nauru (NRU) (2nd and Latvia (LAT) ’s TARVIDA, INESE the 3rd. At -67kg, Lvory Coast (CIV) ’s GBAGBI, RUTH was ranked 1st, KOR’s OH, HYERI player, and TUR’s TATAR, NUR. In the +67kg, CHN’s ZHENG, SHUYIN ranked number 1, GBR’s WALKDEN, BIANKA ranked second, and Poland (POL) ’s KOWALCZUK, AKEKSANDRA ranked third. Second, as a result of comparing the validity of the PageRank model and the APIS model, the validity of the PageRank model was relatively higher in all four weight classes. Conclusion. The page ranking method was found to be more valid for measuring the ranking in Taekwondo competitions than the current APIS system, which we believe the page ranking method is suitable for measuring rankings in various sports events other than Taekwondo.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annals of Applied Sport Science HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： The editorial policy of The Annals of Applied Sport Science (Ann. Appl. Sport Sci.) follows the multi-disciplinary purposes of the sports science to promote the highest standards of scientific study referring to the following fields: • Sport Physiology and its related branches, • Sport Management and its related branches, • Kinesiology and Sport medicine and its related branches, • Sport Psychology and its related branches, • Motor Control and its related branches, • Sport Biomechanics and its related branches, • Sociology of Sport and its related branches, • History of Sport and its related branches, • Exercise, Training, Physical Activity and Health, • Physical Education and Learning. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, and applied to sport and exercise that is defined inclusively to refer to all forms of human movement that aim to maintain or improve physical and mental well-being, create or improve social relationships, or obtain results in competition at all levels. The animal projects also can be evaluated with the decision of Editorial Boards.